High Deep Femoral Artery Bifurcation Can Disturb Safe Femoral Venous Access: CT Assessment in Patients Who Underwent Femoral Venous Access Under Doppler Ultrasound Guidance.

Satoru Morita, Takahiro Yamamoto, Kumi Kamoshida, Hiroshi Yamazaki, Midori Yatabe, Atsuhiro Ichihara, Shuji Sakai
{"title":"High Deep Femoral Artery Bifurcation Can Disturb Safe Femoral Venous Access: CT Assessment in Patients Who Underwent Femoral Venous Access Under Doppler Ultrasound Guidance.","authors":"Satoru Morita,&nbsp;Takahiro Yamamoto,&nbsp;Kumi Kamoshida,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yamazaki,&nbsp;Midori Yatabe,&nbsp;Atsuhiro Ichihara,&nbsp;Shuji Sakai","doi":"10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate the variations of deep femoral artery (DFA) bifurcation on computed tomography (CT) and technical success in femoral venous access.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CT images of 353 patients who underwent adrenal venous sampling were evaluated. Height with relation to the inferior border of the femoral head and direction of DFA bifurcations were classified as follows: type L, low bifurcation; type H1, high lateral bifurcation; type H2, high posterior to posterolateral bifurcation; type H3, high posteromedial bifurcation; and type H4, high medial bifurcation crossing in front of the femoral vein. Technical success and complications during femoral venous access were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequencies of types L, H1, H2, H3, and H4 were 82.7%, 9.1%, 6.9%, 0.4%, and 0.9%, respectively. In 92.2% of type H1 and 69.4% of type H2, the superior femoral artery displaced medially by the high DFA partially overlapped the femoral vein. Upon the inclusions of H3 and H4, in 14.4% of cases, the high DFAs could obstruct the access route to the femoral vein. Using Doppler ultrasound guidance, no significant differences were observed in the rates of success for puncture in the first attempt (84.5% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.122) and accidental arterial puncture (1.0% vs. 0%, p = 1.00) between low and high DFA bifurcations, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High DFA bifurcation is observed in 17.3% of patients and could obstruct the access route to the femoral vein. This can be evaluated using Doppler ultrasound guidance to avoid accidental arterial puncture during femoral venous access.</p>","PeriodicalId":73503,"journal":{"name":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","volume":"6 2","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/f7/2432-0935-6-2-0029.PMC9327428.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the variations of deep femoral artery (DFA) bifurcation on computed tomography (CT) and technical success in femoral venous access.

Materials and methods: CT images of 353 patients who underwent adrenal venous sampling were evaluated. Height with relation to the inferior border of the femoral head and direction of DFA bifurcations were classified as follows: type L, low bifurcation; type H1, high lateral bifurcation; type H2, high posterior to posterolateral bifurcation; type H3, high posteromedial bifurcation; and type H4, high medial bifurcation crossing in front of the femoral vein. Technical success and complications during femoral venous access were also evaluated.

Results: The frequencies of types L, H1, H2, H3, and H4 were 82.7%, 9.1%, 6.9%, 0.4%, and 0.9%, respectively. In 92.2% of type H1 and 69.4% of type H2, the superior femoral artery displaced medially by the high DFA partially overlapped the femoral vein. Upon the inclusions of H3 and H4, in 14.4% of cases, the high DFAs could obstruct the access route to the femoral vein. Using Doppler ultrasound guidance, no significant differences were observed in the rates of success for puncture in the first attempt (84.5% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.122) and accidental arterial puncture (1.0% vs. 0%, p = 1.00) between low and high DFA bifurcations, respectively.

Conclusions: High DFA bifurcation is observed in 17.3% of patients and could obstruct the access route to the femoral vein. This can be evaluated using Doppler ultrasound guidance to avoid accidental arterial puncture during femoral venous access.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高股深动脉分叉会干扰安全的股静脉通路:多普勒超声引导下行股静脉通路患者的CT评估。
目的:回顾性评价股深动脉(DFA)分叉在计算机断层扫描(CT)上的变化和股静脉通路的技术成功。材料与方法:对353例肾上腺静脉取样患者的CT图像进行评价。根据相对于股骨头下缘的高度和DFA分岔方向分为:L型,低分岔;H1型,高侧分岔;H2型,高后至后外侧分叉;H3型,后内侧高分叉;H4型,股静脉前方的高内侧分岔。技术成功和并发症在股静脉通路也进行了评估。结果:L型、H1型、H2型、H3型、H4型的检出率分别为82.7%、9.1%、6.9%、0.4%、0.9%。在92.2%的H1型和69.4%的H2型中,股上动脉因高DFA而向内侧移位,部分重叠于股静脉。在H3和H4包涵体中,14.4%的病例中,高dfa可阻塞股静脉通路。在多普勒超声引导下,首次穿刺成功率(84.5% vs. 75.4%, p = 0.122)和意外动脉穿刺成功率(1.0% vs. 0%, p = 1.00)在低、高DFA分叉之间分别无显著差异。结论:17.3%的患者存在高DFA分叉,并可能阻塞股静脉通路。这可以通过多普勒超声引导来评估,以避免在股静脉通路中意外的动脉穿刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface to the Featured Topic "Image-guided Puncture". Basic Techniques and Technical Tips for Ultrasound-guided Needle Puncture. Embolotherapy of Head and Neck Lesions: Basics and Clinical Tips. Innovative Techniques for Image-guided Percutaneous Puncture: Navigating Complex Cases for Successful Outcomes. Adrenal Hemorrhage as a Complication of Plug-assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastrorenal Shunt Managed by Adrenal Artery Embolization: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1