Clinical Study of Dexmedetomidine in Combination with Butorphanol for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Turkish neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.36585-21.2
Xuejian Wang, Zhifeng Wang, Chen Sun, Zhiming Cui
{"title":"Clinical Study of Dexmedetomidine in Combination with Butorphanol for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).","authors":"Xuejian Wang, Zhifeng Wang, Chen Sun, Zhiming Cui","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.36585-21.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore whether the combination of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and butorphanol (But) could benefit patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 208 TBI patients admitted from February 2018 to January 2020 were randomly divided into four groups as follows: control group (A), Dex group (B), But group (C), and combination of dexmedetomidine and butorphanol group (D). Four groups of patients were treated and studied clinically. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the changes in signs of life, oxygen saturation, serum neuroendocrine data, pain, and agitation scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical data of signs of life and blood oxygen saturation of the four groups were compared, and the differences between group A and group D were statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that a combination of sedative and analgesic agents at low doses could improve the signs of life of TBI patients, and the safety was relatively good. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of the group D on the 5th day post-surgery was improved compared with the control group (A group), suggesting that the combination of sedative and analgesic agents could improve patients' consciousness. The neuroendocrine data of the combination group showed little fluctuation, indicating that a combination of sedative and analgesic agents could significantly reduce the stress response. The scores of pain and agitation in the combination group were significantly improved on the 3rd and 5th days, suggesting that the combination group was better compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of Dex and But was more stable for the treatment of vital signs. Compared with the individual treatment groups, the patients in the combination group had a rapid improvement. The time from treatment to stabilization was shortened, and the prognosis was significantly better compared with the control group. A combination of Dex and But at low doses could significantly maintain neuroendocrine stability. Meanwhile, a combination of sedative and analgesic agents had obvious synergistic effects on enhancing sedation and analgesia as well as anti-muscle tension. Collectively, the combination of Dex and But could significantly benefit the prognosis of TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23395,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.36585-21.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore whether the combination of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and butorphanol (But) could benefit patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Material and methods: A total of 208 TBI patients admitted from February 2018 to January 2020 were randomly divided into four groups as follows: control group (A), Dex group (B), But group (C), and combination of dexmedetomidine and butorphanol group (D). Four groups of patients were treated and studied clinically. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the changes in signs of life, oxygen saturation, serum neuroendocrine data, pain, and agitation scores.

Results: The statistical data of signs of life and blood oxygen saturation of the four groups were compared, and the differences between group A and group D were statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that a combination of sedative and analgesic agents at low doses could improve the signs of life of TBI patients, and the safety was relatively good. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of the group D on the 5th day post-surgery was improved compared with the control group (A group), suggesting that the combination of sedative and analgesic agents could improve patients' consciousness. The neuroendocrine data of the combination group showed little fluctuation, indicating that a combination of sedative and analgesic agents could significantly reduce the stress response. The scores of pain and agitation in the combination group were significantly improved on the 3rd and 5th days, suggesting that the combination group was better compared with the control group.

Conclusion: The combination of Dex and But was more stable for the treatment of vital signs. Compared with the individual treatment groups, the patients in the combination group had a rapid improvement. The time from treatment to stabilization was shortened, and the prognosis was significantly better compared with the control group. A combination of Dex and But at low doses could significantly maintain neuroendocrine stability. Meanwhile, a combination of sedative and analgesic agents had obvious synergistic effects on enhancing sedation and analgesia as well as anti-muscle tension. Collectively, the combination of Dex and But could significantly benefit the prognosis of TBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定联合布托啡诺治疗创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 的临床研究。
目的:探讨右美托咪定(Dex)和丁羟吗啡(But)联合应用是否对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者有益:将2018年2月至2020年1月收治的208例创伤性脑损伤患者随机分为以下四组:对照组(A)、右美托咪定组(B)、丁啡诺组(C)、右美托咪定与丁啡诺联合组(D)。对四组患者进行治疗和临床研究。对生命体征、血氧饱和度、血清神经内分泌数据、疼痛和躁动评分的变化进行了统计分析:比较四组生命体征和血氧饱和度的统计数据,A 组和 D 组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),说明小剂量镇静镇痛联合用药可改善创伤性脑损伤患者的生命体征,安全性相对较好。与对照组(A 组)相比,D 组患者术后第 5 天的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分有所改善,表明镇静镇痛联合用药可改善患者的意识。联合用药组的神经内分泌数据波动很小,表明镇静镇痛联合用药可显著减轻应激反应。联合用药组的疼痛和躁动评分在第 3 天和第 5 天有明显改善,表明联合用药组的疗效优于对照组:结论:Dex 和 But 的联合治疗对生命体征的改善更稳定。结论:联合使用地塞米松和布特治疗生命体征更稳定,与单独治疗组相比,联合治疗组患者的病情改善更快。从治疗到病情稳定的时间缩短,预后明显优于对照组。小剂量的 Dex 和 But 联合用药能明显维持神经内分泌的稳定。同时,镇静剂和镇痛剂的联合应用在增强镇静、镇痛和抗肌肉紧张方面具有明显的协同作用。总之,Dex 和 But 的联合用药对创伤性脑损伤的预后大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish neurosurgery
Turkish neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Turkish Neurosurgery is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access and totally free journal directed at an audience of neurosurgery physicians and scientists. The official language of the journal is English. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Turkish Neurosurgery will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) approval and have strictly observed an acceptable follow-up period. With the exception of reference presentation, Turkish Neurosurgery requires that all manuscripts be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
期刊最新文献
Changes in the Lumbosacral Angle after Spinal Cord Untethering in 23 Children with Tethered Cord Syndrome. Multiple Pathway-Dephosphorylated ASK-1 Confers Temozolomide-Resistance to Human Glioma Cells. A Nomogram Model for Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Medulloblastoma. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with the Polymethyl Methacrylate - Gelatin Sponge Complex in the Treatment of Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Accompanied by Superior Endplate Injurie. Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Clinical Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1