Continuity of physician care over the last year of life for different cause-of-death categories: a retrospective population-based study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-11-08 Print Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210294
Michelle Howard, Abe Hafid, Colleen Webber, Sarina R Isenberg, Ana Gayowsky, Aaron Jones, Mary Scott, Amy T Hsu, Katrin Conen, James Downar, Doug Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro
{"title":"Continuity of physician care over the last year of life for different cause-of-death categories: a retrospective population-based study.","authors":"Michelle Howard, Abe Hafid, Colleen Webber, Sarina R Isenberg, Ana Gayowsky, Aaron Jones, Mary Scott, Amy T Hsu, Katrin Conen, James Downar, Doug Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mix of care provided by family physicians, specialists and palliative care physicians can vary by the illnesses leading to death, which may result in disruptions of continuity of care at the end of life. We measured continuity of outpatient physician care in the last year of life across differing causes of death and assessed factors associated with higher continuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of adults who died in Ontario between 2013 and 2018, using linked provincial health administrative data. We calculated 3 measures of continuity (usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity), which range from 0 to 1, from outpatient physician visits over the last year of life for terminal illness, organ failure, frailty, sudden death and other causes of death. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between characteristics and a continuity score of 0.5 or greater.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 417 628 decedents, we found that mean usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity indices were 0.37, 0.30 and 0.37, respectively, with continuity being the lowest for those with terminal illness (0.27, 0.23 and 0.33, respectively). Higher number of comorbidities, higher neighbourhood income quintile and all non-sudden death categories were associated with lower continuity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We found that continuity of physician care in the last year of life was low, especially in those with cancer. Further research is needed to validate measures of continuity against end-of-life health care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E971-E980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/1f/cmajo.20210294.PMC9648626.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The mix of care provided by family physicians, specialists and palliative care physicians can vary by the illnesses leading to death, which may result in disruptions of continuity of care at the end of life. We measured continuity of outpatient physician care in the last year of life across differing causes of death and assessed factors associated with higher continuity.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of adults who died in Ontario between 2013 and 2018, using linked provincial health administrative data. We calculated 3 measures of continuity (usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity), which range from 0 to 1, from outpatient physician visits over the last year of life for terminal illness, organ failure, frailty, sudden death and other causes of death. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between characteristics and a continuity score of 0.5 or greater.

Results: Among the 417 628 decedents, we found that mean usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity indices were 0.37, 0.30 and 0.37, respectively, with continuity being the lowest for those with terminal illness (0.27, 0.23 and 0.33, respectively). Higher number of comorbidities, higher neighbourhood income quintile and all non-sudden death categories were associated with lower continuity.

Interpretation: We found that continuity of physician care in the last year of life was low, especially in those with cancer. Further research is needed to validate measures of continuity against end-of-life health care outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同死因类别患者生命最后一年的连续性医生护理:一项基于人口的回顾性研究。
背景:家庭医生、专科医生和姑息治疗医生提供的医疗服务组合会因导致死亡的疾病而不同,这可能会导致生命末期医疗服务连续性的中断。我们测量了不同死因患者生命最后一年的门诊医生护理的连续性,并评估了与较高连续性相关的因素:我们利用关联的省级卫生行政数据,对 2013 年至 2018 年期间安大略省死亡的成年人进行了一项回顾性描述性研究。我们计算了生命最后一年中因绝症、器官衰竭、虚弱、猝死和其他死因而就诊的门诊医生的 3 个连续性衡量指标(惯常提供者、Bice-Boxerman 和顺序连续性),范围从 0 到 1。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估特征与连续性得分 0.5 或更高之间的关联:在 417 628 位死者中,我们发现通常提供者、比斯-伯克曼和连续连续性指数的平均值分别为 0.37、0.30 和 0.37,其中患绝症者的连续性指数最低(分别为 0.27、0.23 和 0.33)。合并症数量越多、社区收入五分位数越高以及所有非猝死类别都与连续性较低有关:我们发现,生命最后一年的医生护理连续性较低,尤其是癌症患者。我们还需要进一步的研究来验证生命末期医疗保健结果的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. Identifying clusters of coexisting conditions and outcomes among adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study. Is the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in midlife associated with lower risk of cancer? Evidence from 3 European prospective cohorts. Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1