Development and validation of a fidelity instrument for Cognitive Adaptation Training

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2022.100272
Michelle van Dam , Jaap van Weeghel , Stynke Castelein , Annemarie Stiekema , Piotr Quee , Sean Kidd , Kelly Allott , Natalie Maples , Dawn Velligan , Marieke Pijnenborg , Lisette van der Meer
{"title":"Development and validation of a fidelity instrument for Cognitive Adaptation Training","authors":"Michelle van Dam ,&nbsp;Jaap van Weeghel ,&nbsp;Stynke Castelein ,&nbsp;Annemarie Stiekema ,&nbsp;Piotr Quee ,&nbsp;Sean Kidd ,&nbsp;Kelly Allott ,&nbsp;Natalie Maples ,&nbsp;Dawn Velligan ,&nbsp;Marieke Pijnenborg ,&nbsp;Lisette van der Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2022.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is a psychosocial intervention with demonstrated effectiveness. However, no validated fidelity instrument is available. In this study, a CAT Fidelity Scale was developed and its psychometric properties, including interrater reliability and internal consistency, were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The fidelity scale was developed in a multidisciplinary collaboration between international research groups using the Delphi method. Four Delphi rounds were organized to reach consensus for the items included in the scale. To examine the psychometric properties of the scale, data from a large cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the implementation of CAT in clinical practice was used. Fidelity assessors conducted 73 fidelity reviews at four mental health institutions in the Netherlands.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on a 44-item CAT Fidelity Scale. After administration of the scale, 24 items were removed in round four resulting in a 20-item fidelity scale. Psychometric properties of the 20-item CAT Fidelity Scale shows a fair interrater reliability and an excellent internal consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CAT fidelity scale in its current form is useful for both research purposes as well as for individual health professionals to monitor their own adherence to the protocol. Future research needs to focus on improvement of items and formulating qualitative anchor point to the items to increase generalizability and psychometric properties of the scale. The described suggestions for improvement provide a good starting point for further development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/6b/main.PMC9634354.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) is a psychosocial intervention with demonstrated effectiveness. However, no validated fidelity instrument is available. In this study, a CAT Fidelity Scale was developed and its psychometric properties, including interrater reliability and internal consistency, were evaluated.

Methods

The fidelity scale was developed in a multidisciplinary collaboration between international research groups using the Delphi method. Four Delphi rounds were organized to reach consensus for the items included in the scale. To examine the psychometric properties of the scale, data from a large cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the implementation of CAT in clinical practice was used. Fidelity assessors conducted 73 fidelity reviews at four mental health institutions in the Netherlands.

Results

After three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on a 44-item CAT Fidelity Scale. After administration of the scale, 24 items were removed in round four resulting in a 20-item fidelity scale. Psychometric properties of the 20-item CAT Fidelity Scale shows a fair interrater reliability and an excellent internal consistency.

Conclusions

The CAT fidelity scale in its current form is useful for both research purposes as well as for individual health professionals to monitor their own adherence to the protocol. Future research needs to focus on improvement of items and formulating qualitative anchor point to the items to increase generalizability and psychometric properties of the scale. The described suggestions for improvement provide a good starting point for further development.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知适应训练保真度仪的研制与验证
目的认知适应训练(CAT)是一种行之有效的心理社会干预措施。然而,没有经过验证的保真度仪器可用。在本研究中,开发了CAT保真度量表,并对其心理测量特性进行了评估,包括测试者间的可靠性和内部一致性。方法保真度量表是在国际研究小组之间的多学科合作中使用德尔菲方法开发的。为就比额表所列项目达成协商一致,组织了四轮德尔菲回合。为了检验量表的心理测量特性,使用了一项评估CAT在临床实践中实施情况的大型集群随机对照试验的数据。忠诚度评估员在荷兰的四家心理健康机构进行了73次忠诚度评估。结果经过三轮德尔菲调查,对44项CAT忠诚度量表达成了共识。在施用量表后,在第四轮中去除24个项目,得到20个项目的保真度量表。20项CAT保真度量表的心理测量特性显示出良好的跨测试者可靠性和良好的内部一致性。结论目前形式的CAT保真度量表既有助于研究目的,也有助于卫生专业人员监测自己对协议的遵守情况。未来的研究需要关注项目的改进,并制定项目的定性锚点,以提高量表的可推广性和心理测量特性。所描述的改进建议为进一步发展提供了一个良好的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Cognitive functioning and functional ability in women with schizophrenia and homelessness Humor processing and its relationship with clinical features in patients with first-episode schizophrenia Through the lens of schizophrenia: Recognizing negative facial expressions and family patterns Transcranial direct current stimulation and its effect on cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: An updated review Advances in the ecological validity of research on social cognition in schizophrenia: A systematic review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1