Research Partnerships with Patients Living with Type 2 Diabetes: Practices and Challenges in Quebec Among People New to Canada.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2022-10-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936221129836
Séraphin Balla, Maman Joyce Dogba, Monika Kastner
{"title":"Research Partnerships with Patients Living with Type 2 Diabetes: Practices and Challenges in Quebec Among People New to Canada.","authors":"Séraphin Balla,&nbsp;Maman Joyce Dogba,&nbsp;Monika Kastner","doi":"10.1177/23333936221129836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients are increasingly encouraged to participate in health research programs as partners, with the aim to ensure that studies address their priorities. In response, the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) has been created in Canada to transform the patient's role in research from a passive beneficiary to a more proactive partner of change within the healthcare system. This research investigates what people new to Canada living with type 2 diabetes think about participating in research partnerships. Using an ethnographic approach, 31 people new to Canada with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were interviewed. Findings indicated that few people new to Canada were represented among the Diabetes Action Canada (DAC) Network's Circles of Patient Partners in Quebec. Barriers to engagement in research were: lack of information; competing priorities; language barrier and privacy concerns; preconceptions about being a patient partner; prejudices on research engagement as something demanding and binding; and the matter of religious and gender differences. Some participants questioned the extent to which involvement in research can really meet their expectations considering institutional control over research, funding requirements that often dictate priorities and the biomedical approach which still, in many respects, dominates health research. Implications for achieving equity, diversity, and inclusion of patient partners in research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/26/10.1177_23333936221129836.PMC9629550.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936221129836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients are increasingly encouraged to participate in health research programs as partners, with the aim to ensure that studies address their priorities. In response, the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) has been created in Canada to transform the patient's role in research from a passive beneficiary to a more proactive partner of change within the healthcare system. This research investigates what people new to Canada living with type 2 diabetes think about participating in research partnerships. Using an ethnographic approach, 31 people new to Canada with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were interviewed. Findings indicated that few people new to Canada were represented among the Diabetes Action Canada (DAC) Network's Circles of Patient Partners in Quebec. Barriers to engagement in research were: lack of information; competing priorities; language barrier and privacy concerns; preconceptions about being a patient partner; prejudices on research engagement as something demanding and binding; and the matter of religious and gender differences. Some participants questioned the extent to which involvement in research can really meet their expectations considering institutional control over research, funding requirements that often dictate priorities and the biomedical approach which still, in many respects, dominates health research. Implications for achieving equity, diversity, and inclusion of patient partners in research are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病患者的研究伙伴关系:魁北克新移民的实践和挑战。
越来越多的患者被鼓励作为合作伙伴参与健康研究项目,目的是确保研究解决他们的优先事项。为此,加拿大制定了面向患者的研究战略(SPOR),将患者在研究中的角色从医疗保健系统中的被动受益者转变为更积极主动的合作伙伴。这项研究调查了新到加拿大的2型糖尿病患者对参与研究伙伴关系的看法。采用人种学方法,对31名刚到加拿大诊断为2型糖尿病的人进行了访谈。研究结果表明,在魁北克的加拿大糖尿病行动(DAC)网络患者合作伙伴圈子中,很少有新到加拿大的人。参与研究的障碍是:缺乏信息;竞争优先权;语言障碍和隐私问题;对成为有耐心的伴侣有先入之见;对参与研究有偏见,认为这是一件要求很高、有约束力的事情;宗教和性别差异的问题。一些与会者质疑,考虑到机构对研究的控制、常常决定优先事项的供资要求以及在许多方面仍主导卫生研究的生物医学方法,参与研究在多大程度上能真正满足他们的期望。讨论了在研究中实现公平、多样性和患者合作伙伴的包容性的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
期刊最新文献
Language Matters: Exploring Preferred Terms for Diverse Populations. Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Dignity in Dementia: A Qualitative Analysis. "The Walls Had Been Built": A Qualitative Study of Canadian Adolescent Perspectives on Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Beyond Burnout: Nurses' Perspectives on Chronic Suffering During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Public Health Nurses in an Internal Negotiation Process When There Is Concern About the Child's Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1