Progressing into disaster: The railroad and the spread of cholera in a provincial Ottoman town.

IF 1.1 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE History of Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-10 DOI:10.1177/00732753221113151
Alexander Schweig
{"title":"Progressing into disaster: The railroad and the spread of cholera in a provincial Ottoman town.","authors":"Alexander Schweig","doi":"10.1177/00732753221113151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nineteenth century is often remembered as the age in which steamships and steam locomotives connected the globe with a speed and efficiency previously unseen. Although contemporaries frequently equated the use of these rapid-transportation technologies with the progress of civilization, their expansion also had some negative consequences. Among these was the more rapid and widespread diffusion of many diseases along transportation corridors as nonhuman stowaways on ships and trains. Most infamously, cholera extended its reach globally by appropriating and using modern transportation routes in ways that were unintended and disastrous for their human creators. This article goes beyond the technological optimism of the time, and its now widely accepted pitfalls, and expands the scope of Anatolian provincial modernization to incorporate a complex web of interactions between human and nonhuman agents in the context of technological use and nonuse. It argues for a complex cocreation of modern conditions between these agents, rather than seeing these conditions as solely produced by human actions or environmental limits. Among the different human agents, interaction greatly increased between Ottomans and European states and their citizens. As the Ottoman Empire became increasingly integrated into global transportation and economic networks, it also experienced the spread of cholera. In the Anatolian interior, cholera epidemics spread along the railroad. I examine the 1893 cholera epidemic in Eskişehir, an important junction town on the Ottoman Anatolian Railroad, which had just begun operation the previous year. The railroad was widely celebrated for its intended uses: tremendously increasing the speed and transportable volume of cargo and enabling travel for military and nonmilitary purposes. The cholera epidemic, however, was enabled by the unwitting use of the railroad lines as conveyors of sickness and death. Furthermore, human attempts to stop cholera's spread by interrupting train service undermined the technology's intended uses but also demonstrated the availability and potential effectiveness of nonuse as an option.</p>","PeriodicalId":50404,"journal":{"name":"History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"539-561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00732753221113151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nineteenth century is often remembered as the age in which steamships and steam locomotives connected the globe with a speed and efficiency previously unseen. Although contemporaries frequently equated the use of these rapid-transportation technologies with the progress of civilization, their expansion also had some negative consequences. Among these was the more rapid and widespread diffusion of many diseases along transportation corridors as nonhuman stowaways on ships and trains. Most infamously, cholera extended its reach globally by appropriating and using modern transportation routes in ways that were unintended and disastrous for their human creators. This article goes beyond the technological optimism of the time, and its now widely accepted pitfalls, and expands the scope of Anatolian provincial modernization to incorporate a complex web of interactions between human and nonhuman agents in the context of technological use and nonuse. It argues for a complex cocreation of modern conditions between these agents, rather than seeing these conditions as solely produced by human actions or environmental limits. Among the different human agents, interaction greatly increased between Ottomans and European states and their citizens. As the Ottoman Empire became increasingly integrated into global transportation and economic networks, it also experienced the spread of cholera. In the Anatolian interior, cholera epidemics spread along the railroad. I examine the 1893 cholera epidemic in Eskişehir, an important junction town on the Ottoman Anatolian Railroad, which had just begun operation the previous year. The railroad was widely celebrated for its intended uses: tremendously increasing the speed and transportable volume of cargo and enabling travel for military and nonmilitary purposes. The cholera epidemic, however, was enabled by the unwitting use of the railroad lines as conveyors of sickness and death. Furthermore, human attempts to stop cholera's spread by interrupting train service undermined the technology's intended uses but also demonstrated the availability and potential effectiveness of nonuse as an option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向灾难:铁路与霍乱在奥斯曼帝国一个省城的蔓延。
在人们的记忆中,十九世纪是蒸汽轮船和蒸汽机车以前所未有的速度和效率连接全球的时代。尽管同时代的人们经常将这些快速交通技术的使用与文明进步等同起来,但它们的扩张也带来了一些负面影响。其中包括许多疾病作为非人类偷渡者在轮船和火车上沿着运输通道更迅速、更广泛地传播。最臭名昭著的是霍乱,它通过挪用和利用现代交通路线,将其传播范围扩大到全球,这对人类的创造者来说是始料未及的,也是灾难性的。本文超越了当时的技术乐观主义及其现已被广泛接受的弊端,扩大了安纳托利亚省级现代化的范围,在技术使用和不使用的背景下,纳入了人类和非人类主体之间复杂的互动网络。该书认为,这些主体之间共同创造了复杂的现代条件,而非仅仅将这些条件视为由人类行为或环境限制造成的。在不同的人类主体中,奥斯曼人与欧洲国家及其公民之间的互动大大增加。随着奥斯曼帝国日益融入全球交通和经济网络,它也经历了霍乱的传播。在安纳托利亚内陆,霍乱疫情沿着铁路蔓延。我研究了 1893 年埃斯基谢希尔的霍乱疫情,埃斯基谢希尔是奥斯曼安纳托利亚铁路的一个重要枢纽城镇,该铁路在前一年刚刚开始运营。这条铁路因其预期用途而广受赞誉:极大地提高了货运速度和货运量,实现了军事和非军事目的的旅行。然而,由于铁路线在不知不觉中成为疾病和死亡的传送带,霍乱疫情才得以爆发。此外,人类试图通过中断火车服务来阻止霍乱的传播,这破坏了该技术的预期用途,但同时也证明了不使用该技术的可用性和潜在有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Science
History of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History of Science is peer reviewed journal devoted to the history of science, medicine and technology from earliest times to the present day. Articles discussing methodology, and reviews of the current state of knowledge and possibilities for future research, are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
National climate: Zhu Kezhen and the framing of the atmosphere in modern China. Nafia for the Tigris: The Privy Purse and the infrastructure of development in late Ottoman Iraq, 1882-1914. Progressing into disaster: The railroad and the spread of cholera in a provincial Ottoman town. The politics of electricity use and non-use in late Ottoman Istanbul. From laboratory to mountaintop: Creating an artificial aurora in the late nineteenth century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1