Safety and Efficacy of Elective Switch from Nilotinib to Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Clinical Hematology International Pub Date : 2022-05-12 eCollection Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s44228-022-00001-x
Ali Ibrahim, Nour Moukalled, Rami Mahfouz, Jean El Cheikh, Ali Bazarbachi, Iman Abou Dalle
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Elective Switch from Nilotinib to Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.","authors":"Ali Ibrahim,&nbsp;Nour Moukalled,&nbsp;Rami Mahfouz,&nbsp;Jean El Cheikh,&nbsp;Ali Bazarbachi,&nbsp;Iman Abou Dalle","doi":"10.1007/s44228-022-00001-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with nilotinib has resulted in a higher rate of major molecular (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months compared to imatinib but at a higher cumulative cost and increased risk of serious adverse events. To maintain long-term efficacy and minimize both toxicity and costs, we aimed at evaluating in a prospective single-center trial the efficacy and safety of a response-directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib after 12 months in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase CML. Thirteen adult patients were enrolled. Twelve patients started on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Eleven patients completed one year of nilotinib and were switched to imatinib 400 mg daily as per protocol. At 3 months, all patients achieved a complete hematologic response, with 7 (58%) patients had early molecular response. At 12 months, all patients achieved CCyR, of whom 5 (42%) and 4 (33%) patients achieved MMR and MR4.5, respectively. Three (27%) patients switched back to nilotinib after 18, 24, and 51 months respectively: 1 patient because of loss of CCyR after 18 months, and 2 patients because of imatinib intolerance. At last follow-up, all patients (<i>n</i> = 12) were alive and in MMR, 6 (50%) of them in continuous MR4.5. These findings suggest that response directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib at 12 months is capable of maintaining long-term response, with manageable side effects. This approach warrants further exploration with larger prospective trials. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01316250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT01316250&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=. .</p>","PeriodicalId":10368,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hematology International","volume":"4 1-2","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358791/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hematology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44228-022-00001-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The treatment of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with nilotinib has resulted in a higher rate of major molecular (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months compared to imatinib but at a higher cumulative cost and increased risk of serious adverse events. To maintain long-term efficacy and minimize both toxicity and costs, we aimed at evaluating in a prospective single-center trial the efficacy and safety of a response-directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib after 12 months in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase CML. Thirteen adult patients were enrolled. Twelve patients started on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Eleven patients completed one year of nilotinib and were switched to imatinib 400 mg daily as per protocol. At 3 months, all patients achieved a complete hematologic response, with 7 (58%) patients had early molecular response. At 12 months, all patients achieved CCyR, of whom 5 (42%) and 4 (33%) patients achieved MMR and MR4.5, respectively. Three (27%) patients switched back to nilotinib after 18, 24, and 51 months respectively: 1 patient because of loss of CCyR after 18 months, and 2 patients because of imatinib intolerance. At last follow-up, all patients (n = 12) were alive and in MMR, 6 (50%) of them in continuous MR4.5. These findings suggest that response directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib at 12 months is capable of maintaining long-term response, with manageable side effects. This approach warrants further exploration with larger prospective trials. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01316250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT01316250&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=. .

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼洛替尼选择性切换到伊马替尼治疗新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病的安全性和有效性。
与伊马替尼相比,尼罗替尼治疗新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病(CML)在12个月时的主要分子(MMR)和完全细胞遗传学反应(CCyR)率更高,但累积成本更高,严重不良事件的风险增加。为了保持长期疗效并最小化毒性和成本,我们旨在通过一项前瞻性单中心试验评估新诊断为慢性期CML的患者在12个月后从尼洛替尼转向伊马替尼的疗效和安全性。13名成年患者入组。12名患者开始服用尼罗替尼300毫克,每日两次。11名患者完成了一年的尼罗替尼治疗,并根据治疗方案改为每天400mg伊马替尼。在3个月时,所有患者都获得了完全的血液反应,其中7例(58%)患者有早期分子反应。12个月时,所有患者均达到CCyR,其中5例(42%)和4例(33%)患者分别达到MMR和MR4.5。3例(27%)患者分别在18个月、24个月和51个月后切换回尼罗替尼:1例患者在18个月后CCyR丢失,2例患者因伊马替尼不耐受。最后随访,所有患者(n = 12)存活并处于MMR,其中6例(50%)处于持续MR4.5。这些研究结果表明,在12个月时从尼罗替尼转向伊马替尼能够维持长期反应,副作用可控。这种方法值得进一步探索更大的前瞻性试验。临床试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01316250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT01316250&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Role of Bridging Therapy during CAR-T Therapy How I treat newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia Elranatamab treatment in a multiple myeloma patient undergoing renal dialysis Outcomes of Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with primary refractory Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma who demonstrate chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy Outpatient CAR T-Cell Therapy as Standard of Care: Current Perspectives and Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1