The biomechanical behavior of 3D printed human femoral bones based on generic and patient-specific geometries.

IF 3.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING 3D printing in medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s41205-022-00162-8
Katharina Nägl, Andreas Reisinger, Dieter H Pahr
{"title":"The biomechanical behavior of 3D printed human femoral bones based on generic and patient-specific geometries.","authors":"Katharina Nägl, Andreas Reisinger, Dieter H Pahr","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00162-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone is a highly complex composite material which makes it hard to find appropriate artificial surrogates for patient-specific biomechanical testing. Despite various options of commercially available bones with generic geometries, these are either biomechanically not very realistic or rather expensive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this work, additive manufacturing was used for the fabrication of artificial femoral bones. These were based on CT images of four different commercially available femoral bone surrogates and three human bones with varying bone density. The models were 3D printed using a low-budget fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer and PLA filament. The infill density was mechanically calibrated and varying cortical thickness was used. Compression tests of proximal femora simulating stance were performed and the biomechanical behavior concerning ultimate force, spring stiffness, and fracture pattern were evaluated as well as compared to the results of commercial and cadaveric bones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the ultimate forces and spring stiffness, the 3D printed analogs showed mechanical behavior closer to their real counterparts than the commercially available polyurethan-based surrogates. Furthermore, the increase in ultimate force with increasing bone density observed in human femoral bones could be reproduced well. Also, the fracture patterns observed match well with fracture patterns observed in human hip injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consequently, the methods presented here show to be a promising alternative for artificial generic surrogates concerning femoral strength testing. The manufacturing is straightforward, cheap, and patient-specific geometries are possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00162-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone is a highly complex composite material which makes it hard to find appropriate artificial surrogates for patient-specific biomechanical testing. Despite various options of commercially available bones with generic geometries, these are either biomechanically not very realistic or rather expensive.

Methods: In this work, additive manufacturing was used for the fabrication of artificial femoral bones. These were based on CT images of four different commercially available femoral bone surrogates and three human bones with varying bone density. The models were 3D printed using a low-budget fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer and PLA filament. The infill density was mechanically calibrated and varying cortical thickness was used. Compression tests of proximal femora simulating stance were performed and the biomechanical behavior concerning ultimate force, spring stiffness, and fracture pattern were evaluated as well as compared to the results of commercial and cadaveric bones.

Results: Regarding the ultimate forces and spring stiffness, the 3D printed analogs showed mechanical behavior closer to their real counterparts than the commercially available polyurethan-based surrogates. Furthermore, the increase in ultimate force with increasing bone density observed in human femoral bones could be reproduced well. Also, the fracture patterns observed match well with fracture patterns observed in human hip injuries.

Conclusion: Consequently, the methods presented here show to be a promising alternative for artificial generic surrogates concerning femoral strength testing. The manufacturing is straightforward, cheap, and patient-specific geometries are possible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于通用和特定患者几何形状的 3D 打印人体股骨的生物力学行为。
背景:骨骼是一种高度复杂的复合材料,因此很难找到合适的人工替代物用于特定患者的生物力学测试。尽管市场上有多种具有通用几何形状的骨骼可供选择,但这些骨骼要么在生物力学上不太逼真,要么价格昂贵:在这项工作中,采用了快速成型技术制造人工股骨头。这些模型基于四种不同的市售股骨头代用品和三种不同骨密度的人体骨骼的 CT 图像。使用低成本的熔融沉积成型(FDM)三维打印机和聚乳酸(PLA)长丝对模型进行了三维打印。填充密度经过机械校准,并使用了不同的皮质厚度。对模拟站立的股骨近端进行了压缩试验,评估了极限力、弹簧刚度和断裂模式等生物力学行为,并与商用骨骼和尸体骨骼的结果进行了比较:结果:在极限力和弹簧刚度方面,3D 打印模拟物的机械行为比商用聚氨酯代用品更接近真实的同类产品。此外,在人体股骨头中观察到的极限力随骨密度增加而增加的现象也得到了很好的再现。此外,观察到的骨折模式也与人类髋关节损伤中观察到的骨折模式十分吻合:因此,本文介绍的方法显示出是股骨强度测试方面人工通用替代物的一种有前途的选择。制造简单、成本低廉,而且可以根据患者的具体情况设计几何形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and assessment of case-specific physical and augmented reality simulators for intracranial aneurysm clipping. Fast and accurate distal locking of interlocked intramedullary nails using computer-vision and a 3D printed device. Metamaterial design for aortic aneurysm simulation using 3D printing. 3D-printing inherently MRI-visible accessories in aiding MRI-guided biopsies. Effectiveness of a new 3D printed simulator for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in enhancing the confidence and procedural skills of the operator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1