Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: a review of the risks and determinants.

Brad Rodu, Christer Jansson
{"title":"Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: a review of the risks and determinants.","authors":"Brad Rodu,&nbsp;Christer Jansson","doi":"10.1177/154411130401500502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smokeless tobacco has been associated with oral cancer for many decades. The purpose of this article is to review research relevant to this association, including epidemiologic studies, studies of putative carcinogens such as tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) and other contaminants, and possible cancer inhibitors. Epidemiologic studies addressing this issue primarily consist of case-control studies. They show that the use of chewing tobacco and moist snuff is associated with very low risks for cancers of the oral cavity and related structures (relative risks [RR] from 0.6 to 1.7). The use of dry snuff is associated with higher RRs, ranging from 4 to 13, while the RRs from smokeless tobacco, unspecified as to type, are intermediate (RR = 1.5 to 2.8). With regard to TSNAs, historical levels in American moist snuff products were higher than those in their Swedish counterparts, but levels in contemporary products are uniformly low. TSNA levels in chewing tobacco have always been low, but levels in dry snuff have been higher, including some very high levels in current products. In general, smokeless tobacco users are not exposed to significant levels of cadmium, lead, benzo(a)pyrene, polonium-210, and formaldehyde, when compared with concentrations of these compounds in foods. Finally, low oral cancer risk from smokeless tobacco use may be influenced by the presence of cancer inhibitors, mainly anti-oxidants, in smokeless tobacco products.</p>","PeriodicalId":77086,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists","volume":"15 5","pages":"252-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/154411130401500502","citationCount":"224","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130401500502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 224

Abstract

Smokeless tobacco has been associated with oral cancer for many decades. The purpose of this article is to review research relevant to this association, including epidemiologic studies, studies of putative carcinogens such as tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) and other contaminants, and possible cancer inhibitors. Epidemiologic studies addressing this issue primarily consist of case-control studies. They show that the use of chewing tobacco and moist snuff is associated with very low risks for cancers of the oral cavity and related structures (relative risks [RR] from 0.6 to 1.7). The use of dry snuff is associated with higher RRs, ranging from 4 to 13, while the RRs from smokeless tobacco, unspecified as to type, are intermediate (RR = 1.5 to 2.8). With regard to TSNAs, historical levels in American moist snuff products were higher than those in their Swedish counterparts, but levels in contemporary products are uniformly low. TSNA levels in chewing tobacco have always been low, but levels in dry snuff have been higher, including some very high levels in current products. In general, smokeless tobacco users are not exposed to significant levels of cadmium, lead, benzo(a)pyrene, polonium-210, and formaldehyde, when compared with concentrations of these compounds in foods. Finally, low oral cancer risk from smokeless tobacco use may be influenced by the presence of cancer inhibitors, mainly anti-oxidants, in smokeless tobacco products.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无烟烟草与口腔癌:风险和决定因素综述。
几十年来,人们一直认为无烟烟草与口腔癌有关。本文的目的是回顾与这种关联相关的研究,包括流行病学研究,假定的致癌物,如烟草特异性亚硝胺(TSNAs)和其他污染物的研究,以及可能的癌症抑制剂。针对这一问题的流行病学研究主要包括病例对照研究。他们表明,使用咀嚼烟草和湿鼻烟与患口腔及相关结构癌症的风险非常低(相对风险[RR]从0.6到1.7)。使用干鼻烟的相对危险度较高,介于4至13之间,而无烟烟草的相对危险度为中等(相对危险度= 1.5至2.8),未指明类型。关于tsna,美国湿鼻烟产品的历史水平高于瑞典同类产品,但当代产品的水平一致较低。咀嚼烟草中的TSNA含量一直很低,但干鼻烟中的TSNA含量较高,包括目前产品中的一些非常高的含量。一般来说,与食品中这些化合物的浓度相比,无烟烟草使用者接触到的镉、铅、苯并(a)芘、钋-210和甲醛的含量并不高。最后,无烟烟草使用导致的口腔癌低风险可能受到无烟烟草制品中存在的癌症抑制剂(主要是抗氧化剂)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It is time to move on..... TGF-beta signal transduction in oro-facial health and non-malignant disease (part I). The role of TGF-beta in epithelial malignancy and its relevance to the pathogenesis of oral cancer (part II). Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: a literature review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1