Metacognition instruction enhances equity in effective study strategies across demographic groups in the general chemistry I course†

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1039/D3RP00103B
Caroline Z. Muteti, Brooke I. Jacob and Jacinta M. Mutambuki
{"title":"Metacognition instruction enhances equity in effective study strategies across demographic groups in the general chemistry I course†","authors":"Caroline Z. Muteti, Brooke I. Jacob and Jacinta M. Mutambuki","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00103B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Explicit teaching of metacognition, ‘thinking about one's thinking,’ has been shown to improve achievement scores in the general chemistry tests and facilitate the awareness and adoption of metacognitive strategies. However, very few studies have investigated variations in the reported metacognitive strategies employed by college science majors by gender, race/ethnicity, and first-generation status. Additionally, little is known as to whether metacognition instruction makes any difference in closing the reported existing equity gap in the use of effective study strategies across demographic groups. Using a qualitative approach and open-ended questionnaires completed by 259 general chemistry 1 students, we investigated variations in reported (1) study strategies including metacognitive strategies between demographic groups in the general chemistry I course prior to and immediately after a 50 minute metacognition lesson retrospectively, (2) long-term gains in the study strategies and the adoption across the demographic groups over a semester after the metacognition instruction, and (3) transfer of the reported acquired study strategies to other science courses beyond the general chemistry lecture course. The findings showed evidence of equity gaps in the reported use, gains, or adoption of specific study strategies related to lower-order study strategies (LOSSs) and higher-order study strategies (HOSSs) based on gender, race/ethnicity, and first-generation status prior to and after the metacognition instruction. However, the identified equity gaps in LOSSs and HOSSs prior to the metacognition instruction were narrowed or closed with students’ exposure to the study strategies. Additionally, the findings indicated that over half of the study participants from all the demographic groups, except males and first-generation participants reported transfer of the acquired study strategies from the metacognition instruction to other courses. These findings imply the existence of equity gaps in study strategies across demographic groups in general chemistry I. Additionally, explicit teaching of study strategies, including metacognition, can relinquish the existing equity gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 1204-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/rp/d3rp00103b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Explicit teaching of metacognition, ‘thinking about one's thinking,’ has been shown to improve achievement scores in the general chemistry tests and facilitate the awareness and adoption of metacognitive strategies. However, very few studies have investigated variations in the reported metacognitive strategies employed by college science majors by gender, race/ethnicity, and first-generation status. Additionally, little is known as to whether metacognition instruction makes any difference in closing the reported existing equity gap in the use of effective study strategies across demographic groups. Using a qualitative approach and open-ended questionnaires completed by 259 general chemistry 1 students, we investigated variations in reported (1) study strategies including metacognitive strategies between demographic groups in the general chemistry I course prior to and immediately after a 50 minute metacognition lesson retrospectively, (2) long-term gains in the study strategies and the adoption across the demographic groups over a semester after the metacognition instruction, and (3) transfer of the reported acquired study strategies to other science courses beyond the general chemistry lecture course. The findings showed evidence of equity gaps in the reported use, gains, or adoption of specific study strategies related to lower-order study strategies (LOSSs) and higher-order study strategies (HOSSs) based on gender, race/ethnicity, and first-generation status prior to and after the metacognition instruction. However, the identified equity gaps in LOSSs and HOSSs prior to the metacognition instruction were narrowed or closed with students’ exposure to the study strategies. Additionally, the findings indicated that over half of the study participants from all the demographic groups, except males and first-generation participants reported transfer of the acquired study strategies from the metacognition instruction to other courses. These findings imply the existence of equity gaps in study strategies across demographic groups in general chemistry I. Additionally, explicit teaching of study strategies, including metacognition, can relinquish the existing equity gaps.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知教学提高了普通化学I课程中不同人口群体有效学习策略的公平性†
元认知的显性教学“思考自己的思维”已被证明可以提高普通化学测试的成绩,并促进元认知策略的意识和采用。然而,很少有研究调查大学科学专业学生采用的元认知策略因性别、种族/民族和第一代身份而异。此外,对于元认知教学是否对缩小据报道的不同人口群体在使用有效学习策略方面存在的公平差距有任何影响,我们知之甚少。采用定性方法和由259名普通化学一年级学生完成的开放式问卷,我们回顾性地调查了所报告的(1)在50分钟元认知课前后,普通化学一课程中人口统计学组之间的学习策略(包括元认知策略)的变化,(2)在元认知教学后的一个学期内,学习策略的长期收益和人口统计学群体的采用,以及(3)将所报告的习得学习策略转移到普通化学讲座课程之外的其他科学课程中。研究结果显示,在元认知教学前后,基于性别、种族/民族和第一代地位,与低阶学习策略(LOSS)和高阶学习策略相关的特定学习策略的使用、获得或采用存在公平差距。然而,在元认知教学之前,LOSS和HOSS中已确定的公平差距随着学生对学习策略的接触而缩小或缩小。此外,研究结果表明,除男性和第一代参与者外,来自所有人口统计学群体的研究参与者中,超过一半的人报告称,习得学习策略从元认知教学转移到了其他课程。这些发现表明,在普通化学I中,不同人口群体的学习策略存在公平差距。此外,包括元认知在内的学习策略的显性教学可以消除现有的公平差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Guidance on the data availability statement requirement in CERP The use of mobile technology in abductive inquiry-based teaching and learning of chemical bonding Improving the teaching of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics: a systematic review with meta-analysis “I’m still here and I want them to know that”: experiences of chemists with concealable identities in undergraduate research A lack of impact of pedagogy (peer-led team learning compared with didactic instruction) on long-term student knowledge of chemical equilibrium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1