{"title":"Einstein’s 1905 Derivation of the Mass-Energy Equivalence: Is It Valid? Is Energy Always Equal to Mass and Vice Versa?","authors":"G. D’Abramo","doi":"10.1134/S1063779623050076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1905, Einstein gave his first derivation of the mass-energy equivalence by studying, in different reference frames, the energy balance of a body emitting electromagnetic radiation and assuming special relativity as a prerequisite. Here, we reassess the logical soundness of Einstein’s approach and the validity of one assumption crucial for his derivation. That assumption has nothing to do with special relativity. If we accept that assumption as valid, the essence of the mass-energy equivalence (but not its exact formula) can be reached without special relativity or any full-fledged physical theory. However, that assumption is unsupported from a physics viewpoint, and with its use, Einstein was begging the question. We also show why a consequence of the widely received interpretation of <span>\\(E = m{{c}^{2}}\\)</span> (i.e., every kind of energy has a mass) can be problematic.</p>","PeriodicalId":729,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Particles and Nuclei","volume":"54 5","pages":"966 - 971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Particles and Nuclei","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063779623050076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 1905, Einstein gave his first derivation of the mass-energy equivalence by studying, in different reference frames, the energy balance of a body emitting electromagnetic radiation and assuming special relativity as a prerequisite. Here, we reassess the logical soundness of Einstein’s approach and the validity of one assumption crucial for his derivation. That assumption has nothing to do with special relativity. If we accept that assumption as valid, the essence of the mass-energy equivalence (but not its exact formula) can be reached without special relativity or any full-fledged physical theory. However, that assumption is unsupported from a physics viewpoint, and with its use, Einstein was begging the question. We also show why a consequence of the widely received interpretation of \(E = m{{c}^{2}}\) (i.e., every kind of energy has a mass) can be problematic.
期刊介绍:
The journal Fizika Elementarnykh Chastits i Atomnogo Yadr of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR, Dubna) was founded by Academician N.N. Bogolyubov in August 1969. The Editors-in-chief of the journal were Academician N.N. Bogolyubov (1970–1992) and Academician A.M. Baldin (1992–2001). Its English translation, Physics of Particles and Nuclei, appears simultaneously with the original Russian-language edition. Published by leading physicists from the JINR member states, as well as by scientists from other countries, review articles in this journal examine problems of elementary particle physics, nuclear physics, condensed matter physics, experimental data processing, accelerators and related instrumentation ecology and radiology.