Bitter taste sensitivity, cruciferous vegetable intake, obesity, and diabetes in American adults: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2013–2014†

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Food & Function Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1039/D3FO02175K
Shirun Ma and Sophia Lu
{"title":"Bitter taste sensitivity, cruciferous vegetable intake, obesity, and diabetes in American adults: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2013–2014†","authors":"Shirun Ma and Sophia Lu","doi":"10.1039/D3FO02175K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >\r\n <em>Objective</em>: To examine the associations between bitter taste sensitivity, cruciferous vegetable consumption, and likelihood of obesity and diabetes among American adults. <em>Research design and method</em>: Cross-section observation of 2129 adults aged 40–80 years of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014. Bitter taste sensitivity was estimated by the generalized labeled magnitude scale (gLMS) rating for bitterness (non-tasters: the lowest 25%, the others were tasters). Consumption of cruciferous vegetables was recorded by the 2 day 24 hours dietary records. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg m<small><sup>−2</sup></small>. Diabetes was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, or who reported taking diabetes medication or individuals with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg dL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> or Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5%. <em>Results</em>: The proportion of participants who ate cruciferous vegetables over the two days was 29.5% among bitter tasters, significantly lower than that (35.7%) among non-tasters (<em>P</em> = 0.04) after adjustment of age, gender, race/ethnicity, dietary energy intake, physical activity, education, smoking and income levels. Among participants who ate cruciferous vegetables, bitter tasters on average consumed 15.5 g (±7.0) grams less cruciferous vegetables per day compared to non-tasters. The multi-variates adjusted odds ratio of obesity was 1.29 (95% confident interval (CI): 0.76–2.17), 1.40 (95% CI: 0.90–2.18) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.05–2.67) among bitter tasters who ate cruciferous vegetables, among non-tasters who did not ate cruciferous vegetables, and among bitter tasters who did not eat cruciferous vegetables, respectively, as compared with non-tasters who ate cruciferous vegetables. The prevalence of diabetes was 17.3% and 13.0% among bitter tasters and non-tasters, respectively, with a multi-adjusted odds ratio of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.02–1.69, <em>P</em> = 0.033) for diabetes comparing bitter tasters with non-tasters, which was attenuated to 1.26 (95% CI: 0.95–1.67, <em>P</em> = 0.108) by further adjustment of cruciferous vegetables consumption and obesity, with a mediation effect of 17.8% (95% CI: 2.9%–60.9%; <em>P</em> = 0.069). <em>Conclusion</em>: Bitter taste sensitivity was associated with less consumption of cruciferous vegetables and a high likelihood of obesity, which may mediate its association with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" 20","pages":" 9243-9252"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/fo/d3fo02175k","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the associations between bitter taste sensitivity, cruciferous vegetable consumption, and likelihood of obesity and diabetes among American adults. Research design and method: Cross-section observation of 2129 adults aged 40–80 years of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014. Bitter taste sensitivity was estimated by the generalized labeled magnitude scale (gLMS) rating for bitterness (non-tasters: the lowest 25%, the others were tasters). Consumption of cruciferous vegetables was recorded by the 2 day 24 hours dietary records. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg m−2. Diabetes was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, or who reported taking diabetes medication or individuals with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg dL−1 or Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5%. Results: The proportion of participants who ate cruciferous vegetables over the two days was 29.5% among bitter tasters, significantly lower than that (35.7%) among non-tasters (P = 0.04) after adjustment of age, gender, race/ethnicity, dietary energy intake, physical activity, education, smoking and income levels. Among participants who ate cruciferous vegetables, bitter tasters on average consumed 15.5 g (±7.0) grams less cruciferous vegetables per day compared to non-tasters. The multi-variates adjusted odds ratio of obesity was 1.29 (95% confident interval (CI): 0.76–2.17), 1.40 (95% CI: 0.90–2.18) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.05–2.67) among bitter tasters who ate cruciferous vegetables, among non-tasters who did not ate cruciferous vegetables, and among bitter tasters who did not eat cruciferous vegetables, respectively, as compared with non-tasters who ate cruciferous vegetables. The prevalence of diabetes was 17.3% and 13.0% among bitter tasters and non-tasters, respectively, with a multi-adjusted odds ratio of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.02–1.69, P = 0.033) for diabetes comparing bitter tasters with non-tasters, which was attenuated to 1.26 (95% CI: 0.95–1.67, P = 0.108) by further adjustment of cruciferous vegetables consumption and obesity, with a mediation effect of 17.8% (95% CI: 2.9%–60.9%; P = 0.069). Conclusion: Bitter taste sensitivity was associated with less consumption of cruciferous vegetables and a high likelihood of obesity, which may mediate its association with diabetes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人的苦味敏感性、十字花科蔬菜摄入、肥胖和糖尿病:2013-2014年NHANES的横断面研究。
目的:研究美国成年人苦味敏感性、十字花科蔬菜消费量与肥胖和糖尿病可能性之间的关系。研究设计和方法:2013-2014年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)对2129名40-80岁成年人的横断面观察。苦味敏感性通过苦味的广义标记量表(gLMS)评分来估计(非品尝者:最低25%,其他都是品尝者)。通过2天24小时的饮食记录记录十字花科蔬菜的消耗量。肥胖定义为体重指数(BMI)≥30kg m-2。糖尿病被定义为自我报告的医生诊断的糖尿病,或报告服用糖尿病药物的人,或空腹血糖(FPG)≥126 mg dL-1或血红蛋白A1c≥6.5%的人,在调整了年龄、性别、种族/民族、饮食能量摄入、体育活动、教育、吸烟和收入水平后,显著低于非品尝者(35.7%)(P=0.04)。在吃十字花科蔬菜的参与者中,与不品尝者相比,苦味品尝者平均每天少吃15.5克(±7.0)十字花科菜。在吃十字花科蔬菜的苦味品尝者、不吃十字花科蔬菜的非品尝者和不吃十字花科蔬菜的苦涩品尝者中,肥胖的多变量调整优势比分别为1.29(95%置信区间(CI):0.76-2.17)、1.40(95%CI:0.90-2.18)和1.68(95%CI:1.05-2.67),与吃十字花科蔬菜的非品尝者相比。苦味品尝者和非苦味品尝者的糖尿病患病率分别为17.3%和13.0%,与苦味品尝者相比,糖尿病的多因素调整比值比为1.32(95%CI:1.02-1.69,P=0.033),通过进一步调整十字花科蔬菜的消费和肥胖,该比值比降至1.26(95%CI:0.95-1.67,P=0.008),其调节作用为17.8%(95%CI:2.9%-60.9%;P=0.069)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food & Function
Food & Function BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
957
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.
期刊最新文献
Cross-domain binding of anti-fibrillation peptide TNGQ to islet amyloid polypeptide provides cytoprotective effects in giant unilamellar vesicles and pancreatic β-cells. Esterified starches enhance short-term satiety in mice via structural and physicochemical alterations. Galacto-oligosaccharides regulate intestinal mucosal sialylation to counteract antibiotic-induced mucin dysbiosis. Investigation of the hypoglycemic bioactive components of Phyllanthi Fructus through biological assessment combined with ultrafiltration affinity mass spectrometry. The potential role of alkaline diets in prevention of calcium oxalate kidney stone formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1