Medication errors in the practice of paediatric anaesthesia - a narrative review.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesiology intensive therapy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ait.2023.130837
Neha Goyal, Sugandhi Nemani, Ankur Sharma, Varuna Vyas, Nikhil Kothari, Shilpa Goyal
{"title":"Medication errors in the practice of paediatric anaesthesia - a narrative review.","authors":"Neha Goyal,&nbsp;Sugandhi Nemani,&nbsp;Ankur Sharma,&nbsp;Varuna Vyas,&nbsp;Nikhil Kothari,&nbsp;Shilpa Goyal","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.130837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication error has emerged as a significant problem in healthcare, especially in the past 2 decades. In anaesthesia, the paediatric age group is particularly at risk of such events because of complex age- and weight-based drug calculation, drug formulations, serial dilutions, and often limited staff experience in handling such patients. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for literature on medication errors in paediatric anaesthesia in children (< 18 years of age). Two authors searched for the articles independently, and a third author sorted any consensus differences. A total of 2979 articles were retrieved. We studied primary outcomes, the results, and conclusions of the various studies. A total of 21 relevant articles were selected finally. Following preventive strategies like colour coding, accurate dose calculations, verification by a second individual, and checking and encouraging self-reporting can improve perioperative safety in the paediatric population to a significant extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"229-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/49/AIT-55-51321.PMC10496092.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.130837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medication error has emerged as a significant problem in healthcare, especially in the past 2 decades. In anaesthesia, the paediatric age group is particularly at risk of such events because of complex age- and weight-based drug calculation, drug formulations, serial dilutions, and often limited staff experience in handling such patients. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for literature on medication errors in paediatric anaesthesia in children (< 18 years of age). Two authors searched for the articles independently, and a third author sorted any consensus differences. A total of 2979 articles were retrieved. We studied primary outcomes, the results, and conclusions of the various studies. A total of 21 relevant articles were selected finally. Following preventive strategies like colour coding, accurate dose calculations, verification by a second individual, and checking and encouraging self-reporting can improve perioperative safety in the paediatric population to a significant extent.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科麻醉实践中的药物错误——叙述性综述。
用药错误已成为医疗保健中的一个重大问题,尤其是在过去20年中。在麻醉中,由于复杂的基于年龄和体重的药物计算、药物配方、连续稀释,以及工作人员处理此类患者的经验往往有限,儿科年龄组尤其容易发生此类事件。我们在PubMed、Cochrane和Google Scholar上搜索了关于儿童(<18岁)儿科麻醉用药错误的文献。两位作者独立搜索文章,第三位作者对任何一致意见的差异进行了分类。共检索到2979篇文章。我们研究了各种研究的主要结果、结果和结论。最终共选出21篇相关文章。遵循颜色编码、准确的剂量计算、第二个人的验证以及检查和鼓励自我报告等预防策略,可以在很大程度上提高儿科人群的围手术期安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial to compare blind intubation success through LMA Blockbuster® and I-Gel® LMA. Can't intubate, can't oxygenate? What is the preferred surgical strategy? A retrospective analysis. Measures of preoperative anxiety: Part two. Navigating through the paradox of choice: prediction of outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nutritional management in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1