Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray in addition to standard of care in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent: A subgroup analysis of the Asian cohort of ASPIRE I (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study)

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1111/appy.12548
Jin Pyo Hong MD, PhD, Akramul Zikri Abd Malek MBBS, Dr (Psych), Cheng-Ta Li MD, PhD, Jong-Woo Paik MD, PhD, Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman MBBS, MPM, PhD, Gilbert Madriaga DPT, MSc, Jianmin Zhuo PhD, Sarah Siggins PhD, Dong-Jing Fu MD, PhD, Po-Chung Ju PhD
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray in addition to standard of care in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent: A subgroup analysis of the Asian cohort of ASPIRE I (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study)","authors":"Jin Pyo Hong MD, PhD,&nbsp;Akramul Zikri Abd Malek MBBS, Dr (Psych),&nbsp;Cheng-Ta Li MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jong-Woo Paik MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman MBBS, MPM, PhD,&nbsp;Gilbert Madriaga DPT, MSc,&nbsp;Jianmin Zhuo PhD,&nbsp;Sarah Siggins PhD,&nbsp;Dong-Jing Fu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Po-Chung Ju PhD","doi":"10.1111/appy.12548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine in the Asian subgroup from ASPIRE I. Patients with major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation with intent received intranasal esketamine (<i>n</i> = 26) or placebo (<i>n</i> = 27), plus standard of care for 25 days. The primary endpoint was the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to Day 2. The MADRS score improved in favor of esketamine (least squares mean difference: −3.8). No unexpected safety concerns were noted. The Asian subgroup showed a similar efficacy and safety profile as the total ASPIRE I cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":8618,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine in the Asian subgroup from ASPIRE I. Patients with major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation with intent received intranasal esketamine (n = 26) or placebo (n = 27), plus standard of care for 25 days. The primary endpoint was the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to Day 2. The MADRS score improved in favor of esketamine (least squares mean difference: −3.8). No unexpected safety concerns were noted. The Asian subgroup showed a similar efficacy and safety profile as the total ASPIRE I cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除标准护理外,艾司他明鼻喷雾剂对有主动自杀意念的重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性:ASPIRE I亚洲队列的亚组分析(一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究)。
这项事后分析评估了在ASPIRE I的亚洲亚组中鼻内使用冰毒的疗效和安全性。患有严重抑郁障碍和自杀意念的患者接受了鼻内使用的冰毒(n = 26)或安慰剂(n = 27),加上标准护理25 天。主要终点是Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分从基线到第2天的变化。MADRS评分有利于esketamine(最小二乘平均差:-3.8)。没有发现意外的安全问题。亚洲亚组显示出与ASPIRE I总队列相似的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Psychiatry is an international psychiatric journal focused on the Asia and Pacific Rim region, and is the official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrics. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry enables psychiatric and other mental health professionals in the region to share their research, education programs and clinical experience with a larger international readership. The journal offers a venue for high quality research for and from the region in the face of minimal international publication availability for authors concerned with the region. This includes findings highlighting the diversity in psychiatric behaviour, treatment and outcome related to social, ethnic, cultural and economic differences of the region. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and reviews, as well as clinically and educationally focused papers on regional best practices. Images, videos, a young psychiatrist''s corner, meeting reports, a journal club and contextual commentaries differentiate this journal from existing main stream psychiatry journals that are focused on other regions, or nationally focused within countries of Asia and the Pacific Rim.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Differences in the Pathways to Internet Gaming Disorder Issue Information Bipolar disorder and oxidative stress: A bibliometric perspective Issue Information Optimizing esketamine clinic implementation: Insights from Taiwan's mental health framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1