Mapping pandemic responses in urban Indigenous Australia: Reflections on systems thinking and pandemic preparedness

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100084
Bronwyn Fredericks , Abraham Bradfield , James Ward , Sue McAvoy , Shea Spierings , Agnes Toth-Peter , Troy Combo
{"title":"Mapping pandemic responses in urban Indigenous Australia: Reflections on systems thinking and pandemic preparedness","authors":"Bronwyn Fredericks ,&nbsp;Abraham Bradfield ,&nbsp;James Ward ,&nbsp;Sue McAvoy ,&nbsp;Shea Spierings ,&nbsp;Agnes Toth-Peter ,&nbsp;Troy Combo","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We investigate some of the strengths and challenges associated with Covid-19 responses in urban Indigenous communities in Brisbane, Australia. Our research reflects on the interconnected dynamics that impact health outcomes and mitigate or exacerbate the risk of Covid-19 spreading within urban Indigenous communities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three systems thinking workshops were held in 2021 with Indigenous and non-Indigenous stakeholders (N15/workshop) from State and Federal services, along with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations. All worked in the urban Indigenous health sector. Stakeholders produced a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) incorporating the critical feedbacks determining the dynamics influencing health outcomes. The aim of the research was to help stakeholders’ build awareness of how the structure of the system influences health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Stakeholders identified 6 key dynamics which have a negative or positive impact on mitigating risks of Covid-19 infection. By mapping these dynamics within a CLD, 7 intervention points were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Systems thinking provides a useful tool in identifying the complexities associated with navigating health challenges, but further research is needed to develop frameworks that work in conjunction with Indigenous Australian methodologies.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>Indigenous voices and communities must lie central to health responses/policies for Indigenous peoples. When systems thinking is done by or in collaboration with stakeholders it provides a visual language that can help design public health policy. What can be ascertained is that their effectiveness is predicated on systems thinking’s integration with Indigenous methodologies that acknowledges Indigenous self-determination and challenges Eurocentric representations of health and Indigeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

We investigate some of the strengths and challenges associated with Covid-19 responses in urban Indigenous communities in Brisbane, Australia. Our research reflects on the interconnected dynamics that impact health outcomes and mitigate or exacerbate the risk of Covid-19 spreading within urban Indigenous communities.

Methods

Three systems thinking workshops were held in 2021 with Indigenous and non-Indigenous stakeholders (N15/workshop) from State and Federal services, along with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations. All worked in the urban Indigenous health sector. Stakeholders produced a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) incorporating the critical feedbacks determining the dynamics influencing health outcomes. The aim of the research was to help stakeholders’ build awareness of how the structure of the system influences health outcomes.

Results

Stakeholders identified 6 key dynamics which have a negative or positive impact on mitigating risks of Covid-19 infection. By mapping these dynamics within a CLD, 7 intervention points were identified.

Conclusions

Systems thinking provides a useful tool in identifying the complexities associated with navigating health challenges, but further research is needed to develop frameworks that work in conjunction with Indigenous Australian methodologies.

Implications for public health

Indigenous voices and communities must lie central to health responses/policies for Indigenous peoples. When systems thinking is done by or in collaboration with stakeholders it provides a visual language that can help design public health policy. What can be ascertained is that their effectiveness is predicated on systems thinking’s integration with Indigenous methodologies that acknowledges Indigenous self-determination and challenges Eurocentric representations of health and Indigeneity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制澳大利亚土著城市的流行病应对措施:对系统思维和流行病准备的思考。
目标:我们调查了澳大利亚布里斯班城市土著社区新冠肺炎应对措施的一些优势和挑战。我们的研究反映了影响健康结果并减轻或加剧新冠肺炎在城市土著社区传播风险的相互关联的动态。方法:2021年,与来自州和联邦服务部门的土著和非土著利益相关者(N15/研讨会)以及土著社区控制的卫生组织一起举办了三次系统思维研讨会。所有人都在城市土著卫生部门工作。利益相关者制作了一个因果循环图(CLD),其中包含了决定影响健康结果的动态的关键反馈。这项研究的目的是帮助利益相关者提高对系统结构如何影响健康结果的认识。结果:利益相关者确定了6个关键动态,这些动态对降低新冠肺炎感染风险具有负面或积极影响。通过在CLD内绘制这些动力学图,确定了7个干预点。结论:系统思维为识别应对健康挑战的复杂性提供了一个有用的工具,但还需要进一步的研究来开发与澳大利亚土著方法论相结合的框架。对公共卫生的影响:土著声音和社区必须成为土著人民卫生对策/政策的核心。当系统思维由利益相关者完成或与利益相关者合作时,它提供了一种视觉语言,可以帮助设计公共卫生政策。可以确定的是,它们的有效性取决于系统思维与土著方法的结合,这种方法承认土著自决,并挑战以欧洲为中心的健康和愤怒的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Emergency contraception access in Fijian community pharmacies: A descriptive study Preventive healthcare practice by allied health professionals: Results from a cross-sectional survey in rural and regional Victoria Revising a right to food road map—perspectives of Australian key informants “Freedom to move through the house”: How a healthy housing initiative improves quality of life in Aotearoa New Zealand How do we fund Public Health in Australia? How should we?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1