Healthcare-Associated Infections and the Hospital Bed.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000039
Evan Call, Kasey J Call, Craig Oberg, Cassidee Capunay, Daniel N Clark
{"title":"Healthcare-Associated Infections and the Hospital Bed.","authors":"Evan Call,&nbsp;Kasey J Call,&nbsp;Craig Oberg,&nbsp;Cassidee Capunay,&nbsp;Daniel N Clark","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bedframes are a potential source of bacterial contamination, fomites, and healthcare-associated infections for patients with active skin wounds and other underlying conditions. Bedframes also differ in their design, materials, texture, and ease of disassembly for cleaning. In this study, the authors evaluated five hospital bedframes in terms of retained soil and ease of cleaning as rated by volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital mattresses were placed on five different bedframes and soiled with mock bodily fluids containing Geobacillus stearothermophilus endospores as an indicator organism for contamination. In a second set of experiments, volunteers evaluated the bedframes for ease of cleaning; fewer than 30% of the volunteers had experience cleaning in hospitals or had previously received infection-control training. Questionnaires evaluated subjective measures such as ease of cleaning and texture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Researchers observed a strong correlation between the initial amount of soil retained, the most probable number calculations of endospore counts, and the number of washes to reach extinction (no detectable endospores). Although volunteers' rankings for ease of cleaning were independent of the amount of soil retained, their rankings correlated with the actual washes to reach undetectable limits and bedframe materials that were perceived as harder to clean.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the importance of both bedframe design and user cleaning experience in reducing bedframes as a source of healthcare-associated infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"36 10","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Bedframes are a potential source of bacterial contamination, fomites, and healthcare-associated infections for patients with active skin wounds and other underlying conditions. Bedframes also differ in their design, materials, texture, and ease of disassembly for cleaning. In this study, the authors evaluated five hospital bedframes in terms of retained soil and ease of cleaning as rated by volunteers.

Methods: Hospital mattresses were placed on five different bedframes and soiled with mock bodily fluids containing Geobacillus stearothermophilus endospores as an indicator organism for contamination. In a second set of experiments, volunteers evaluated the bedframes for ease of cleaning; fewer than 30% of the volunteers had experience cleaning in hospitals or had previously received infection-control training. Questionnaires evaluated subjective measures such as ease of cleaning and texture.

Results: Researchers observed a strong correlation between the initial amount of soil retained, the most probable number calculations of endospore counts, and the number of washes to reach extinction (no detectable endospores). Although volunteers' rankings for ease of cleaning were independent of the amount of soil retained, their rankings correlated with the actual washes to reach undetectable limits and bedframe materials that were perceived as harder to clean.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of both bedframe design and user cleaning experience in reducing bedframes as a source of healthcare-associated infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗相关感染和病床。
目的:对于有活动性皮肤伤口和其他潜在疾病的患者来说,床架是细菌污染、寄生虫和医疗保健相关感染的潜在来源。床架在设计、材料、质地以及便于拆卸清洁方面也有所不同。在这项研究中,作者根据志愿者的评价,对五个医院床架的残留土壤和易清洁性进行了评估。方法:将医院床垫放置在五种不同的床架上,并用含有嗜热脂肪土芽孢杆菌内孔的模拟体液污染,作为污染的指示生物。在第二组实验中,志愿者评估床架是否易于清洁;只有不到30%的志愿者有过在医院打扫卫生的经历或之前接受过感染控制培训。调查问卷评估了诸如易清洁性和质地等主观指标。结果:研究人员观察到,土壤的初始保留量、内生孢子计数的最可能数量计算和达到灭绝的洗涤次数(没有可检测的内生孢子)之间存在很强的相关性。尽管志愿者的易清洁性排名与保留的土壤量无关,但他们的排名与达到检测不到的极限的实际洗涤次数和被认为更难清洁的床架材料相关。结论:这项研究证明了床架设计和用户清洁体验在减少床架作为医疗保健相关感染源方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Indices of Topical Antiseptics in Wound Care: A Systematic Review. Omega Fatty Acid-Based Therapy for Healing of Recalcitrant Wounds in Patients with Complex Comorbidities. A Catheter Securement Strategy for Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa. Examining the Effect of Oral Health on Nutrition Status and Wound Healing. Healing with Systematic Wound Management after Minimally Invasive Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1