Socioeconomic disadvantage and engagement with digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in Western Sydney: A secondary analysis of surveillance data

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100087
Benjamin Silberberg , Christian Young , Shopna Bag , Conrad Moreira , Sophie Norton , Jessica Wells , Ramon Z Shaban
{"title":"Socioeconomic disadvantage and engagement with digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in Western Sydney: A secondary analysis of surveillance data","authors":"Benjamin Silberberg ,&nbsp;Christian Young ,&nbsp;Shopna Bag ,&nbsp;Conrad Moreira ,&nbsp;Sophie Norton ,&nbsp;Jessica Wells ,&nbsp;Ramon Z Shaban","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>COVID-19 outcomes were highly inequitably distributed in Australia and worldwide. The digitalisation of public health interventions offers resource-efficiency and increased capacity for pandemic responses, but risks excluding the elderly and disadvantaged, reinforcing existing inequalities. Despite this, there has been little evaluation of the determinants of uptake of digital contact tracing.</p><p>This paper describes the use of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in a population in metropolitan Sydney and the determinants of engagement in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Routinely collected surveillance data for residents of Western Sydney Local Health District, returning a positive SARS-CoV-2 result between 1<sup>st</sup> August 2021 and 12<sup>th</sup> February 2022, were extracted including responses to a digital contact tracing questionnaire. Individual records were linked to area-level socioeconomic indices of disadvantage.</p><p>Descriptive analyses explored characteristics of non-responders and geospatial variation. Logistic regression was undertaken to evaluate the effect of age, sex and socioeconomic disadvantage on the odds of response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 133 055 individuals included, 130 645 (98%) were issued a digital contact tracing questionnaire, and 106 432 (81%) responded. Odds of responding were lower in males <em>(odds ratio: 0.79)</em>, individuals aged 80+ <em>(odds ratio: 0.17)</em> and the most disadvantaged communities <em>(odds ratio: 0.32)</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Digital data collection for contact tracing was a scalable and efficient tool in the context of the Western Sydney Local Health District COVID-19 response. However, older people and individuals in disadvantaged communities were less likely to engage.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><p>Responses to future pandemics should leverage the resource-efficiency of digital interventions but should avoid compounding existing health inequalities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

COVID-19 outcomes were highly inequitably distributed in Australia and worldwide. The digitalisation of public health interventions offers resource-efficiency and increased capacity for pandemic responses, but risks excluding the elderly and disadvantaged, reinforcing existing inequalities. Despite this, there has been little evaluation of the determinants of uptake of digital contact tracing.

This paper describes the use of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in a population in metropolitan Sydney and the determinants of engagement in this population.

Methods

Routinely collected surveillance data for residents of Western Sydney Local Health District, returning a positive SARS-CoV-2 result between 1st August 2021 and 12th February 2022, were extracted including responses to a digital contact tracing questionnaire. Individual records were linked to area-level socioeconomic indices of disadvantage.

Descriptive analyses explored characteristics of non-responders and geospatial variation. Logistic regression was undertaken to evaluate the effect of age, sex and socioeconomic disadvantage on the odds of response.

Results

Of the 133 055 individuals included, 130 645 (98%) were issued a digital contact tracing questionnaire, and 106 432 (81%) responded. Odds of responding were lower in males (odds ratio: 0.79), individuals aged 80+ (odds ratio: 0.17) and the most disadvantaged communities (odds ratio: 0.32).

Conclusions

Digital data collection for contact tracing was a scalable and efficient tool in the context of the Western Sydney Local Health District COVID-19 response. However, older people and individuals in disadvantaged communities were less likely to engage.

Implications for Public Health

Responses to future pandemics should leverage the resource-efficiency of digital interventions but should avoid compounding existing health inequalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西悉尼新冠肺炎数字接触者追踪的社会经济劣势和参与:监测数据的二次分析。
目标:新冠肺炎结果在澳大利亚和世界范围内分布极不公平。公共卫生干预措施的数字化提高了资源效率,提高了应对疫情的能力,但也有可能将老年人和弱势群体排除在外,从而加剧现有的不平等。尽管如此,对采用数字接触者追踪的决定因素几乎没有评估。本文描述了在悉尼大都市人群中使用数字接触者追踪新冠肺炎,以及参与该人群的决定因素。方法:提取2021年8月1日至2022年2月12日期间返回阳性严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的西悉尼地方卫生区居民的常规监测数据,包括对数字接触者追踪问卷的回复。个人记录与地区一级的不利社会经济指数有关。描述性分析探讨了无应答者的特征和地理空间变化。采用Logistic回归评估年龄、性别和社会经济劣势对反应几率的影响。结果:在纳入的133055人中,130645人(98%)获得了数字接触者追踪问卷,106432人(81%)得到了回复。男性(比值比:0.79)、80岁以上个体(比值比为0.17)和最弱势社区(比值比是0.32)的反应几率较低。结论:在西悉尼地方卫生区新冠肺炎应对的背景下,接触者追踪的数字数据收集是一种可扩展且有效的工具。然而,老年人和弱势社区的个人参与的可能性较小。对公共卫生的影响:应对未来流行病应利用数字干预的资源效率,但应避免加剧现有的健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Emergency contraception access in Fijian community pharmacies: A descriptive study Preventive healthcare practice by allied health professionals: Results from a cross-sectional survey in rural and regional Victoria Revising a right to food road map—perspectives of Australian key informants “Freedom to move through the house”: How a healthy housing initiative improves quality of life in Aotearoa New Zealand How do we fund Public Health in Australia? How should we?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1