Assessing the performance of the Cell Painting assay across different imaging systems.

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Cytometry Part A Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.24786
Callum Tromans-Coia, Nasim Jamali, Hamdah Shafqat Abbasi, Kenneth A Giuliano, Mai Hagimoto, Kevin Jan, Erika Kaneko, Stefan Letzsch, Alexander Schreiner, Jonathan Z Sexton, Mahomi Suzuki, O Joseph Trask, Mitsunari Yamaguchi, Fumiki Yanagawa, Michael Yang, Anne E Carpenter, Beth A Cimini
{"title":"Assessing the performance of the Cell Painting assay across different imaging systems.","authors":"Callum Tromans-Coia, Nasim Jamali, Hamdah Shafqat Abbasi, Kenneth A Giuliano, Mai Hagimoto, Kevin Jan, Erika Kaneko, Stefan Letzsch, Alexander Schreiner, Jonathan Z Sexton, Mahomi Suzuki, O Joseph Trask, Mitsunari Yamaguchi, Fumiki Yanagawa, Michael Yang, Anne E Carpenter, Beth A Cimini","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative microscopy is a powerful method for performing phenotypic screens from which image-based profiling can extract a wealth of information, termed profiles. These profiles can be used to elucidate the changes in cellular phenotypes across cell populations from different patient samples or following genetic or chemical perturbations. One such image-based profiling method is the Cell Painting assay, which provides morphological insight through the imaging of eight cellular compartments. Here, we examine the performance of the Cell Painting assay across multiple high-throughput microscope systems and find that all are compatible with this assay. Furthermore, we determine independently for each microscope system the best performing settings, providing those who wish to adopt this assay an ideal starting point for their own assays. We also explore the impact of microscopy setting changes in the Cell Painting assay and find that few dramatically reduce the quality of a Cell Painting profile, regardless of the microscope used.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":" ","pages":"915-926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative microscopy is a powerful method for performing phenotypic screens from which image-based profiling can extract a wealth of information, termed profiles. These profiles can be used to elucidate the changes in cellular phenotypes across cell populations from different patient samples or following genetic or chemical perturbations. One such image-based profiling method is the Cell Painting assay, which provides morphological insight through the imaging of eight cellular compartments. Here, we examine the performance of the Cell Painting assay across multiple high-throughput microscope systems and find that all are compatible with this assay. Furthermore, we determine independently for each microscope system the best performing settings, providing those who wish to adopt this assay an ideal starting point for their own assays. We also explore the impact of microscopy setting changes in the Cell Painting assay and find that few dramatically reduce the quality of a Cell Painting profile, regardless of the microscope used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同成像系统中细胞绘画测定的性能。
定量显微镜是进行表型筛选的一种强大方法,基于图像的图谱可以从中提取丰富的信息,称为图谱。这些图谱可用于阐明不同患者样本或遗传或化学扰动后细胞群中细胞表型的变化。一种基于图像的分析方法是细胞绘画分析,它通过对八个细胞区室的成像提供形态学见解。在这里,我们在多个高通量显微镜系统中检查了细胞绘画测定的性能,发现所有这些都与该测定兼容。此外,我们独立确定每个显微镜系统的最佳性能设置,为那些希望采用这种分析的人提供了自己分析的理想起点。我们还探讨了显微镜设置变化对细胞绘画测定的影响,发现无论使用何种显微镜,都很少有人能显著降低细胞绘画剖面的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Volume 105A, Number 12, December 2024 Cover Image Autofluorescence lifetime flow cytometry rapidly flows from strength to strength. Flow cytometry-based method to detect and separate Mycoplasma hyorhinis in cell cultures. The consequence of mismatched buffers in purity checks when spectral cell sorting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1