Efficacy of Three Teriparatide Preparations and Romosozumab, Osteogenesis Promoters, in the Treatment of Fresh Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s40801-023-00385-z
Kouken Hayashi
{"title":"Efficacy of Three Teriparatide Preparations and Romosozumab, Osteogenesis Promoters, in the Treatment of Fresh Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Kouken Hayashi","doi":"10.1007/s40801-023-00385-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, daily, twice weekly, and weekly formulations of teriparatide (TPD) and monthly formulations of romosozumab (ROMO) are available as osteogenesis promoters for the treatment of osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of three TPD preparations and ROMO on fracture healing and low back pain after a fresh vertebral fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study. Patients presenting with fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures were treated subcutaneously with TPD daily (DTPD), twice weekly (2/WTPD), weekly (WTPD), or with ROMO monthly. Bone union, vertebral height changes, and low back pain in the injured vertebra were compared after 6 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone union and pain improvement were more frequent among those who received daily and twice weekly administration of TPD compared with those who received WTPD and ROMO administration. A comparison for multiplicity between the groups using the Steel-Dwass test showed significant differences between the DTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0029) and WTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0490), suggesting superior bone fusion in the DTPD and WTPD groups. Similarly, significant differences were noted between the DTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0001), WTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0341), and 2/WTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0009), indicating a higher degree of pain improvement in the DTPD, WTPD, and 2/WTPD groups compared with that in the ROMO group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Daily, weekly, and twice-weekly administration of TPD may be superior to ROMO for promoting fresh vertebral fracture healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10730485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-023-00385-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Japan, daily, twice weekly, and weekly formulations of teriparatide (TPD) and monthly formulations of romosozumab (ROMO) are available as osteogenesis promoters for the treatment of osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture.

Objective: To compare the effects of three TPD preparations and ROMO on fracture healing and low back pain after a fresh vertebral fracture.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Patients presenting with fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures were treated subcutaneously with TPD daily (DTPD), twice weekly (2/WTPD), weekly (WTPD), or with ROMO monthly. Bone union, vertebral height changes, and low back pain in the injured vertebra were compared after 6 months of treatment.

Results: Bone union and pain improvement were more frequent among those who received daily and twice weekly administration of TPD compared with those who received WTPD and ROMO administration. A comparison for multiplicity between the groups using the Steel-Dwass test showed significant differences between the DTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0029) and WTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0490), suggesting superior bone fusion in the DTPD and WTPD groups. Similarly, significant differences were noted between the DTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0001), WTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0341), and 2/WTPD and ROMO groups (p = 0.0009), indicating a higher degree of pain improvement in the DTPD, WTPD, and 2/WTPD groups compared with that in the ROMO group.

Conclusions: Daily, weekly, and twice-weekly administration of TPD may be superior to ROMO for promoting fresh vertebral fracture healing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种Teriparatide制剂和成骨促进剂Romosozumab治疗新鲜椎体骨折的疗效:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:在日本,特立帕肽(TPD)的每日、每周两次和每周配方以及罗莫索珠单抗(ROMO)的每月配方可作为成骨促进剂,用于治疗骨折风险高的骨质疏松症。目的:比较三种TPD制剂和ROMO对新鲜椎体骨折后骨折愈合和腰痛的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究。对出现新鲜骨质疏松性椎体骨折的患者进行每日(DTPD)、每周两次(2/WTPD)、每周一次(WTPD)或每月ROMO的皮下治疗。治疗6个月后,比较受伤椎骨的骨愈合、椎骨高度变化和腰痛。结果:与接受WTPD和ROMO治疗的患者相比,每天和每周两次接受TPD治疗的患者骨愈合和疼痛改善更频繁。使用Steel Dwass试验对各组之间的多重性进行比较,结果显示,DTPD和ROMO组(p=0.0029)与WTPD和ROMO组(p=0.0490)之间存在显著差异,表明DTPD和WTPD组的骨融合效果较好。类似地,DTPD和ROMO组(p=0.0001)、WTPD和ROMO组(p=0.0341)以及2/WTPD和ROM组(p=0.0009)之间存在显著差异,表明与ROMO组相比,DTPD、WTPD、2/WTPD组的疼痛改善程度更高。结论:在促进新鲜椎体骨折愈合方面,TPD的每日、每周和每周两次给药可能优于ROMO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit. Comparison of the Safety of Aspirin Monotherapy and Aspirin and P2Y12 Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients Post Coil Embolization During Admission: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database. US Clinical Practice Experience with Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Acute Clinical Events and Healthcare Resource Utilization. Clinical Significance of Prior Ramucirumab Use on the Effectiveness of Nivolumab as the Third-Line Regimen in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Early Clinical Outcomes of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparison with First-Line or Later-Line Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1