Use of Diuretics and Risk of Acute Angle Closure: A Case-Control Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2023.2264387
Grace L Qiao, Frederick S Mikelberg, Mahyar Etminan
{"title":"Use of Diuretics and Risk of Acute Angle Closure: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Grace L Qiao, Frederick S Mikelberg, Mahyar Etminan","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2023.2264387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the possible link between acute angle closure (AAC) with use of diuretics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nested case-control study (NCC) was conducted among a cohort of diuretic users using the PharMetrics Plus database from 2006 to 2020. Cases were identified as the first international classification of diseases 9<sup>th</sup> and 10<sup>th</sup> editions (ICD-9/10) code for ACC. For each case, 4 controls were selected and matched to the cases by age and sex using density-based sampling. A conditional logistic regression model was used to compute rate ratios (RRs) adjusted for the drugs topiramate, bupropion, sulphonamide antibiotics, acetazolamide, and sulfasalazine. The RRs for a negative control drug, amlodipine, was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the initial cohort of 713 574 diuretics users, 1 553 cases and 6 212 controls were identified. No increase in the risk of AAC with current users of diuretics was found (RR = 1.06, (95% CI: 0.81-1.37) for all diuretics; RR = 0.97, (95% CI: 0.71-1.32) for thiazides; RR = 1.24, (95% CI: 0.90-1.73) for loop diuretics; RR = 0.99, (95% CI: 0.73-1.36) for potassium sparing).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no increase in the risk of acute angle closure with use of diuretics. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"321-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2023.2264387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the possible link between acute angle closure (AAC) with use of diuretics.

Methods: A nested case-control study (NCC) was conducted among a cohort of diuretic users using the PharMetrics Plus database from 2006 to 2020. Cases were identified as the first international classification of diseases 9th and 10th editions (ICD-9/10) code for ACC. For each case, 4 controls were selected and matched to the cases by age and sex using density-based sampling. A conditional logistic regression model was used to compute rate ratios (RRs) adjusted for the drugs topiramate, bupropion, sulphonamide antibiotics, acetazolamide, and sulfasalazine. The RRs for a negative control drug, amlodipine, was also assessed.

Results: From the initial cohort of 713 574 diuretics users, 1 553 cases and 6 212 controls were identified. No increase in the risk of AAC with current users of diuretics was found (RR = 1.06, (95% CI: 0.81-1.37) for all diuretics; RR = 0.97, (95% CI: 0.71-1.32) for thiazides; RR = 1.24, (95% CI: 0.90-1.73) for loop diuretics; RR = 0.99, (95% CI: 0.73-1.36) for potassium sparing).

Conclusion: We found no increase in the risk of acute angle closure with use of diuretics. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利尿剂的使用与急性闭角风险:一项病例对照研究。
目的:探讨急性闭角(AAC)与利尿剂使用之间的可能联系。方法:2006年至2020年,使用PharMetrics Plus数据库在利尿剂使用者队列中进行了一项嵌套病例对照研究(NCC)。病例被确定为ACC的第一个国际疾病分类第9版和第10版(ICD-9/10)代码。对于每个病例,选择4名对照,并使用基于密度的抽样按年龄和性别与病例匹配。使用条件logistic回归模型计算托吡酯、安非他酮、磺酰胺类抗生素、乙酰唑胺和柳氮磺吡啶药物的比率(RR)。阴性对照药物氨氯地平的RR也进行了评估。结果:从713 574名利尿剂使用者的初始队列中,确定了1 553例病例和6 212例对照。目前使用利尿剂的患者患AAC的风险没有增加(RR = 1.06(95%可信区间:0.81-1.37);RR = 噻嗪类为0.97(95%可信区间:0.71-1.32);RR = 1.24(95%CI:0.90-1.73);RR = 0.99(95%可信区间:0.73-1.36)。结论:我们发现使用利尿剂不会增加急性闭角的风险。未来的研究需要证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Risk Screening Tool for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in a German Cohort. Feasibility and Patient Experience of a Pilot Artificial Intelligence-Based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program in Northern Ontario. Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Dilated Fundus Examinations by Metropolitan Status from 2017-2021: An Assessment of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Weather Patterns, Patient, and Appointment Characteristics Associated with Cancellations and No-Shows in a Glaucoma Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1