The Global Prevalence and Severity of Dental Caries among Racially Minoritized Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Caries Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1159/000533565
Sonia Nath, Sneha Sethi, João L Bastos, Helena M Constante, Gloria Mejia, Dandara Haag, Kostas Kapellas, Lisa Jamieson
{"title":"The Global Prevalence and Severity of Dental Caries among Racially Minoritized Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sonia Nath, Sneha Sethi, João L Bastos, Helena M Constante, Gloria Mejia, Dandara Haag, Kostas Kapellas, Lisa Jamieson","doi":"10.1159/000533565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racially minoritized children often bear a greater burden of dental caries, but the overall magnitude of racial gaps in oral health and their underlying factors are unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to fill these knowledge gaps. We compared racially minoritized (E) children aged 5-11 years (P) with same-age privileged groups (C) to determine the magnitude and correlates of racial inequities in dental caries (O) in observational studies (S). Using the PICOS selection criteria, a targeted search was performed from inception to December 1, 2021, in nine major electronic databases and an online web search for additional grey literature. The primary outcome measures were caries severity, as assessed by mean decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) among children and untreated dental caries prevalence (d &gt; 0%). The meta-analysis used the random-effects model to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Subgroup analysis, tests for heterogeneity (I2, Galbraith plot), leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, cumulative analysis, and publication bias (Egger's test and funnel plots) tests were carried out. The New Castle Ottawa scale was used to assess risk of bias. This review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021282771. A total of 75 publications were included in the descriptive analysis. The SMD of dmft score was higher by 2.30 (95% CI: 0.45, 4.15), and the prevalence of untreated dental caries was 23% (95% CI: 16, 31) higher among racially minoritized children, compared to privileged groups. Cumulative analysis showed worsening caries outcomes for racially marginalized children over time and larger inequities in dmft among high-income countries. Our study highlights the high caries burden among minoritized children globally by estimating overall trends and comparing against factors including time, country, and world income. The large magnitude of these inequities, combined with empirical evidence on the oral health impacts of racism and other forms of oppression, reinforce that oral health equity can only be achieved with social and political changes at a global level.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"485-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racially minoritized children often bear a greater burden of dental caries, but the overall magnitude of racial gaps in oral health and their underlying factors are unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to fill these knowledge gaps. We compared racially minoritized (E) children aged 5-11 years (P) with same-age privileged groups (C) to determine the magnitude and correlates of racial inequities in dental caries (O) in observational studies (S). Using the PICOS selection criteria, a targeted search was performed from inception to December 1, 2021, in nine major electronic databases and an online web search for additional grey literature. The primary outcome measures were caries severity, as assessed by mean decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) among children and untreated dental caries prevalence (d > 0%). The meta-analysis used the random-effects model to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Subgroup analysis, tests for heterogeneity (I2, Galbraith plot), leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, cumulative analysis, and publication bias (Egger's test and funnel plots) tests were carried out. The New Castle Ottawa scale was used to assess risk of bias. This review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021282771. A total of 75 publications were included in the descriptive analysis. The SMD of dmft score was higher by 2.30 (95% CI: 0.45, 4.15), and the prevalence of untreated dental caries was 23% (95% CI: 16, 31) higher among racially minoritized children, compared to privileged groups. Cumulative analysis showed worsening caries outcomes for racially marginalized children over time and larger inequities in dmft among high-income countries. Our study highlights the high caries burden among minoritized children globally by estimating overall trends and comparing against factors including time, country, and world income. The large magnitude of these inequities, combined with empirical evidence on the oral health impacts of racism and other forms of oppression, reinforce that oral health equity can only be achieved with social and political changes at a global level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族未成年儿童龋齿的全球患病率和严重程度:系统综述和荟萃分析。
少数民族儿童通常承受更大的龋齿负担,但口腔健康方面种族差距的总体程度及其潜在因素尚不清楚。为了填补这些知识空白,进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。我们比较了5-11岁的少数种族(E)儿童(P)和同龄特权群体(C),以确定观察性研究(S)中龋齿(O)种族不平等的程度和相关性。使用PICOS选择标准,从开始到2021年12月1日,在九个主要电子数据库中进行了有针对性的搜索,并在网上搜索了其他灰色文献。主要的结果指标是龋齿的严重程度,通过儿童的平均龋齿、缺牙和补牙(dmft)和未经治疗的龋齿患病率(d>;0%)进行评估。荟萃分析使用随机效应模型计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。进行了亚组分析、异质性检验(I2,Galbraith图)、漏一敏感性分析、累积分析和发表偏倚(Egger检验和漏斗图)检验。渥太华新城量表用于评估偏见的风险。该审查已在PROSPERO注册,CRD42021282771。描述性分析共包括75篇出版物。与特权群体相比,dmft的SMD评分高出2.30(95%CI:0.45,4.15),未经治疗的龋齿患病率在少数种族儿童中高出23%(95%CI:16,31)。累积分析显示,随着时间的推移,种族边缘化儿童的龋齿结果不断恶化,高收入国家中dmft的不平等现象更大。我们的研究通过估计总体趋势并与时间、国家和世界收入等因素进行比较,突出了全球少数民族儿童的高龋齿负担。这些不平等现象的严重性,加上种族主义和其他形式压迫对口腔健康影响的经验证据,强化了只有在全球范围内进行社会和政治变革,才能实现口腔健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
期刊最新文献
Selective outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials on dental caries in children and adolescents: A meta-research study. Is poor self-rated health associated with higher caries experience in adults? The HUNT4 Oral Health Study. Concentration and Stability of Fluoride Chemically Available in Charcoal-Containing Toothpastes. Dentists' Treatment Decisions Concerning Restorations in Adult Patients in North Norway: A Cross-Sectional Tromsø 7 Study. Dietary Carbohydrates Modulate Streptococcus mutans Adherence and Bacterial Proteome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1