Predictors of mental health outcomes of three refugee groups in an advocacy-based intervention: A precision medicine perspective.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1037/ccp0000847
Meredith A Blackwell, Jessica R Goodkind, Elizabeth A Yeater, M Lee Van Horn
{"title":"Predictors of mental health outcomes of three refugee groups in an advocacy-based intervention: A precision medicine perspective.","authors":"Meredith A Blackwell, Jessica R Goodkind, Elizabeth A Yeater, M Lee Van Horn","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Precision medicine is an area with great potential for mental health, but has made limited gains prognostically in predicting effective treatments. For refugees exposed to violence, culture may be a crucial factor in predicting treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this study, 290 participants from three regions (Afghanistan, the Great Lakes region of Africa, and Iraq and Syria) participated in a randomized controlled trial of an advocacy-based intervention. Emotional distress symptoms were measured prior to intervention, midintervention (3 months), postintervention (6 months), and follow-up (6 months after the end of intervention). Number of traumatic events, resource access, social support, and English proficiency were tested for potential predictive effects on intervention outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel generalized linear models revealed that Afghans' (<i>B</i> = -0.259, <i>SE</i> = 0.108, <i>p</i> = .013), and Great Lakes Africans' (<i>B</i> = -0.116, <i>SE</i> = 0.057, <i>p</i> = .042) emotional distress symptoms improved as a function of the intervention, while Iraqis and Syrians showed no intervention effects. For Afghans, English proficiency (<i>B</i> = -0.453, <i>SE</i> = 0.157, <i>p</i> < .01) and social support (<i>B</i> = -0.179, <i>SE</i> = 0.086, <i>p</i> = .037) were most strongly correlated to emotional distress, while for Africans, resource access (<i>B</i> = -0.483, <i>SE</i> = 0.082, <i>p</i> < .001) and social support (<i>B</i> = -0.100, <i>SE</i> = 0.048, <i>p</i> = .040) were the strongest predictors of emotional distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Response to advocacy-based interventions and active ingredients may be influenced by culture; findings have implications for refugees and precision medicine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"16-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000847","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Precision medicine is an area with great potential for mental health, but has made limited gains prognostically in predicting effective treatments. For refugees exposed to violence, culture may be a crucial factor in predicting treatment outcomes.

Method: For this study, 290 participants from three regions (Afghanistan, the Great Lakes region of Africa, and Iraq and Syria) participated in a randomized controlled trial of an advocacy-based intervention. Emotional distress symptoms were measured prior to intervention, midintervention (3 months), postintervention (6 months), and follow-up (6 months after the end of intervention). Number of traumatic events, resource access, social support, and English proficiency were tested for potential predictive effects on intervention outcome.

Results: Multilevel generalized linear models revealed that Afghans' (B = -0.259, SE = 0.108, p = .013), and Great Lakes Africans' (B = -0.116, SE = 0.057, p = .042) emotional distress symptoms improved as a function of the intervention, while Iraqis and Syrians showed no intervention effects. For Afghans, English proficiency (B = -0.453, SE = 0.157, p < .01) and social support (B = -0.179, SE = 0.086, p = .037) were most strongly correlated to emotional distress, while for Africans, resource access (B = -0.483, SE = 0.082, p < .001) and social support (B = -0.100, SE = 0.048, p = .040) were the strongest predictors of emotional distress.

Conclusions: Response to advocacy-based interventions and active ingredients may be influenced by culture; findings have implications for refugees and precision medicine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于倡导的干预中三个难民群体心理健康结果的预测因素:精准医学视角。
目的:精准医学是一个在心理健康方面具有巨大潜力的领域,但在预测有效治疗方面取得的进展有限。对于遭受暴力的难民来说,文化可能是预测治疗结果的关键因素。方法:在这项研究中,来自三个地区(阿富汗、非洲大湖区、伊拉克和叙利亚)的290名参与者参加了一项基于倡导的干预的随机对照试验。在干预前、干预中(3个月)、干预后(6个月)和随访(干预结束后6个月后)测量情绪困扰症状。测试了创伤事件的数量、资源获取、社会支持和英语水平对干预结果的潜在预测作用。结果:多水平广义线性模型显示,阿富汗人(B=-0.259,SE=0.108,p=.013)和大湖区非洲人(B=-0.116,SE=0.057,p=.042)的情绪困扰症状随着干预的作用而改善,而伊拉克人和叙利亚人没有表现出干预效果。对于阿富汗人来说,英语水平(B=-0.453,SE=0.157,p<.01)和社会支持(B=-0.179,SE=0.086,p<.037)与情绪困扰的相关性最强,而对于非洲人来说,资源获取(B=-0.483,SE=0.082,p<.001)和社会支持(B=-0.100,SE=0.048,p<.040)是情绪困扰的最强预测因素。结论:对基于宣传的干预措施和有效成分的反应可能受到文化的影响;这一发现对难民和精准医疗有启示。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
期刊最新文献
Telehealth-delivered depression prevention: Short-term outcomes from a school-based randomized controlled trial. Results of a randomized waitlist-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral sex therapy and online mindfulness-based sex therapy for hypoactive sexual desire dysfunction in women. Safety behavior reduction for appearance concerns: A randomized controlled trial of a smartphone-based intervention. Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program (IATP) for alcohol use disorder: Comparison with conventional cognitive-behavioral treatment and examination of coping skills as a mediator of treatment. Disruptive child behavior severity and parenting program session attendance: Individual participant data meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1