Comparison of the effectiveness of various parasitological methods in detecting nematode eggs in different types of soil.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-28 Epub Date: 2023-09-27 DOI:10.26444/aaem/172454
Jolanta Małgorzata Zdybel, Jacek Sroka, Jacek Karamon, Ewa Bilska-Zając, Angelina Wójcik-Fatla, Teresa Kłapeć, Piotr Skowron, Grzegorz Siebielec, Tamara Jadczyszyn, Tomasz Cencek
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of various parasitological methods in detecting nematode eggs in different types of soil.","authors":"Jolanta Małgorzata Zdybel,&nbsp;Jacek Sroka,&nbsp;Jacek Karamon,&nbsp;Ewa Bilska-Zając,&nbsp;Angelina Wójcik-Fatla,&nbsp;Teresa Kłapeć,&nbsp;Piotr Skowron,&nbsp;Grzegorz Siebielec,&nbsp;Tamara Jadczyszyn,&nbsp;Tomasz Cencek","doi":"10.26444/aaem/172454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Natural fertilizers, sewage sludge, digestates, as well as organic fertilizers produced on their basis, can become a source of parasitological contamination of cultivated land. High concentration of invasive forms of parasites in the soil may pose a threat to human and animal health. Therefore, it is necessary to control the hygienic condition of fertilizers and fertilized soils with particular emphasis on parasites. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of methods commonly used for parasitological examination of soil with own methods which were used to develop the standards.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was carried out using samples of sandy soil (SS), horticultural mix soil (HS) and peat-based substrate (PS). Each sample was spiked with 100 dyed Ascaris suum eggs and examined with the use of 6 methods: Vasilkova, Dada, Quinn, and 3 methods according to the Polish Standards (PN-19000, PN- 19005, PN-19006). For each variant, 8 repetitions were made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest number of A. suum eggs were found with PN-19006 (mean number of detected eggs was 21.25, 46.50, 23.00 for HS, SS, PS, respectively. Slightly lower results were obtained using PN-19005 - the mean number eggs was 21.25, 36.00, 16.75, respectively. On the other hand, the mean number of A. suum eggs found with the Dada method was about 2-3 times lower than with the PN-19006 - 15.75, 22.50, 6.50 for HS, SS, PS soil, respectively. Other methods were much less effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PN-19006 method turned out to be the most effective in detecting A. suum eggs. This method can be used for parasitological examination of soils and can be the basis for developing a system of methods dedicated to testing different types of soils for the presence of nematode eggs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50970,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/172454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Natural fertilizers, sewage sludge, digestates, as well as organic fertilizers produced on their basis, can become a source of parasitological contamination of cultivated land. High concentration of invasive forms of parasites in the soil may pose a threat to human and animal health. Therefore, it is necessary to control the hygienic condition of fertilizers and fertilized soils with particular emphasis on parasites. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of methods commonly used for parasitological examination of soil with own methods which were used to develop the standards.

Material and methods: The study was carried out using samples of sandy soil (SS), horticultural mix soil (HS) and peat-based substrate (PS). Each sample was spiked with 100 dyed Ascaris suum eggs and examined with the use of 6 methods: Vasilkova, Dada, Quinn, and 3 methods according to the Polish Standards (PN-19000, PN- 19005, PN-19006). For each variant, 8 repetitions were made.

Results: The largest number of A. suum eggs were found with PN-19006 (mean number of detected eggs was 21.25, 46.50, 23.00 for HS, SS, PS, respectively. Slightly lower results were obtained using PN-19005 - the mean number eggs was 21.25, 36.00, 16.75, respectively. On the other hand, the mean number of A. suum eggs found with the Dada method was about 2-3 times lower than with the PN-19006 - 15.75, 22.50, 6.50 for HS, SS, PS soil, respectively. Other methods were much less effective.

Conclusions: PN-19006 method turned out to be the most effective in detecting A. suum eggs. This method can be used for parasitological examination of soils and can be the basis for developing a system of methods dedicated to testing different types of soils for the presence of nematode eggs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同寄生虫学方法在不同类型土壤中检测线虫卵的有效性比较。
引言和目的:天然肥料、污水污泥、消化物以及在此基础上生产的有机肥料可能成为耕地寄生虫学污染的来源。土壤中高浓度的侵入性寄生虫可能对人类和动物健康构成威胁。因此,有必要控制肥料和施肥土壤的卫生条件,特别是寄生虫。本研究的目的是比较土壤寄生虫学检查常用方法与制定标准所用方法的有效性。材料和方法:采用沙质土壤(SS)、园艺混合土(HS)和泥炭基质(PS)样品进行研究。每个样品掺入100个染色的蛔虫卵,并根据波兰标准(PN-19000、PN-19005、PN-19006)使用6种方法进行检查:Vasilkova、Dada、Quinn和3种方法。对于每个变体,进行8次重复。结果:用PN-19006发现的A.suum卵数量最多(HS、SS和PS的平均检测卵数分别为21.25、46.50和23.00。使用PN-19005获得的结果略低,平均卵数分别是21.25、36.00和16.75。另一方面,使用Dada方法发现的A.suum卵数比PN-19006低约2-3倍,HS、SS、PS土壤分别为15.75、22.50和6.50效果要差得多。结论:PN-19006法是最有效的毒鸡蛋检测方法。该方法可用于土壤的寄生虫学检查,并可作为开发一套专门测试不同类型土壤是否存在线虫卵的方法系统的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: All papers within the scope indicated by the following sections of the journal may be submitted: Biological agents posing occupational risk in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry and diseases caused by these agents (zoonoses, allergic and immunotoxic diseases). Health effects of chemical pollutants in agricultural areas , including occupational and non-occupational effects of agricultural chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers) and effects of industrial disposal (heavy metals, sulphur, etc.) contaminating the atmosphere, soil and water. Exposure to physical hazards associated with the use of machinery in agriculture and forestry: noise, vibration, dust. Prevention of occupational diseases in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry. Work-related accidents and injuries in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry: incidence, causes, social aspects and prevention. State of the health of rural communities depending on various factors: social factors, accessibility of medical care, etc.
期刊最新文献
Strategies for coping with stress, emotional control and occupational burnout among surgical nurses Perceived stress and burnout in nurses – the moderating role of age and network analysis perspective How to get rid of ticks – a mini-review on tick control strategies in parks, gardens, and other human-related environments Surface electromyography vs clinical outcome measures after robot-assisted gait training in patients with spinal cord injury after post-acute phase of rehabilitation Association between dietary variety and anthropometric parameters in community-dwelling older adults: results of a population-based PolSenior study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1