The effect of ocular rinse volume on surface irritation after povidone-iodine preparation for intravitreal injections: a randomized controlled trial.

Farzad Jamshidi, Haoxing D Jin, Andrew Bruce, Michael Kutteh, Kai Ding, Kamran M Riaz, Ronald M Kingsley, Vinay A Shah
{"title":"The effect of ocular rinse volume on surface irritation after povidone-iodine preparation for intravitreal injections: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Farzad Jamshidi, Haoxing D Jin, Andrew Bruce, Michael Kutteh, Kai Ding, Kamran M Riaz, Ronald M Kingsley, Vinay A Shah","doi":"10.1186/s40942-023-00470-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether the volume of wash out rinse after povidone iodine (PI) application for intravitreal injections (IVI) affects patients' ocular surface irritation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-masked, randomized-controlled trial consisting of 142 subjects. A total of 51, 45, and 46 patients received 3-mL, 10-mL, and 15-mL of ocular rinse respectively. Reductions in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness II (SPEED II) surveys, conducted before and at 24-72 h post-injection, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in objective dry eye findings of Schirmer test (p-value = 0.788), tear break-up time (p-value = 0.403), Oxford fluorescein grade (p-value = 0.424) between the study groups prior to injections. Dry eye symptoms as measured by reductions in the OSDI and SPEEDII scores were not different between the study groups (p-value = 0.0690 and 0.6227, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no difference in patients' ocular surface irritation between 3-mL, 10-mL, and 15-mL post injection rinse. Given the large number of IVIs performed, modification of practice patterns based on these findings could lead to significant reduction in global cost burden for IVIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10537205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00470-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether the volume of wash out rinse after povidone iodine (PI) application for intravitreal injections (IVI) affects patients' ocular surface irritation.

Methods: This was a prospective, single-masked, randomized-controlled trial consisting of 142 subjects. A total of 51, 45, and 46 patients received 3-mL, 10-mL, and 15-mL of ocular rinse respectively. Reductions in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness II (SPEED II) surveys, conducted before and at 24-72 h post-injection, were analyzed.

Results: There was no statistical difference in objective dry eye findings of Schirmer test (p-value = 0.788), tear break-up time (p-value = 0.403), Oxford fluorescein grade (p-value = 0.424) between the study groups prior to injections. Dry eye symptoms as measured by reductions in the OSDI and SPEEDII scores were not different between the study groups (p-value = 0.0690 and 0.6227, respectively).

Conclusion: There is no difference in patients' ocular surface irritation between 3-mL, 10-mL, and 15-mL post injection rinse. Given the large number of IVIs performed, modification of practice patterns based on these findings could lead to significant reduction in global cost burden for IVIs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内注射用聚维酮碘制剂后眼部冲洗液量对表面刺激的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评估玻璃体内注射用聚维酮碘(PI)冲洗液的用量是否会影响患者的眼表刺激性。方法:这是一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验,由142名受试者组成。共有51、45和46名患者分别接受了3mL、10mL和15mL的眼部冲洗液。分析了在注射前和注射后24-72小时进行的眼表疾病指数(OSDI)和标准化患者眼干燥评估II(SPEED II)调查的减少情况。结果:Schirmer检验的客观干眼检查结果无统计学差异(p值 = 0.788),撕裂时间(p值 = 0.403),牛津荧光素等级(p值 = 0.424)。通过OSDI和SPEEDII评分的降低测量的干眼症症状在研究组之间没有差异(p值 = 分别为0.0690和0.6227)。结论:注射后3mL、10mL和15mL冲洗液对患者眼表刺激没有差异。鉴于进行了大量的IVI,根据这些发现修改实践模式可能会大大减轻IVI的全球成本负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal faricimab for treatment naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a real-world prospective study. Retinal vascular changes after Silicon Oil removal in the Eye with Rhegmatogenous Retinal detachment. Short pulse grid and subthreshold micropulse laser (the sandwich grid) plus intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. The digital age in retinal practice. Retrolental cohesive ophthalmic viscoelastic injection for severe subluxated cataracts: a prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1