Optimizing Telehealth Services: A Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment Conducted Among Community Health Center Patients.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001932
Allison P Pack, Paula Rusca, Josephine Llaneza, Guisselle Wismer, Wei Huang, Rodolfo Zuleta, Stacy C Bailey
{"title":"Optimizing Telehealth Services: A Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment Conducted Among Community Health Center Patients.","authors":"Allison P Pack, Paula Rusca, Josephine Llaneza, Guisselle Wismer, Wei Huang, Rodolfo Zuleta, Stacy C Bailey","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic increased telehealth services in federally funded community health centers (CHCs). Yet little is known about common determinants of use among CHC patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the use of telehealth among patient participants at 1 large CHC network providing care to underserved populations at urban and suburban sites in the Midwest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study utilizing a sequential explanatory design. Participants were English and/or Spanish-speaking adults who attended ≥1 visits for themselves or their child over a 12-month period at any practice location. Research staff conducted a structured phone survey of eligible adults. The results subsequently facilitated purposive sampling of telehealth \"users\" and \"nonusers\" for qualitative phone interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey participants included 500 adults. Most had access to the resources needed to utilize telehealth, including a smartphone (90.4%) and home internet (83.0%). About half (50.8%) \"rarely or never\" had problems with internet speed, reliability, or quality. Most (81.1%) were aware of the patient portal and 59.8% had utilized video visits. Participants who were Spanish-speaking and with limited English proficiency faced some of the greatest barriers. Qualitative interview participants included 12 users and 12 nonusers of telehealth. Users found telehealth convenient and efficient, while nonusers lacked awareness about how telehealth services could be beneficial or needed assistance to sign up, join, or use telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants had the resources and awareness necessary to use telehealth services. Those who use them appreciate the convenience and efficiency. Nevertheless, additional support may be needed to prevent telehealth from exacerbating health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10840924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic increased telehealth services in federally funded community health centers (CHCs). Yet little is known about common determinants of use among CHC patients.

Objective: We examined the use of telehealth among patient participants at 1 large CHC network providing care to underserved populations at urban and suburban sites in the Midwest.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study utilizing a sequential explanatory design. Participants were English and/or Spanish-speaking adults who attended ≥1 visits for themselves or their child over a 12-month period at any practice location. Research staff conducted a structured phone survey of eligible adults. The results subsequently facilitated purposive sampling of telehealth "users" and "nonusers" for qualitative phone interviews.

Results: The survey participants included 500 adults. Most had access to the resources needed to utilize telehealth, including a smartphone (90.4%) and home internet (83.0%). About half (50.8%) "rarely or never" had problems with internet speed, reliability, or quality. Most (81.1%) were aware of the patient portal and 59.8% had utilized video visits. Participants who were Spanish-speaking and with limited English proficiency faced some of the greatest barriers. Qualitative interview participants included 12 users and 12 nonusers of telehealth. Users found telehealth convenient and efficient, while nonusers lacked awareness about how telehealth services could be beneficial or needed assistance to sign up, join, or use telehealth.

Conclusions: Most participants had the resources and awareness necessary to use telehealth services. Those who use them appreciate the convenience and efficiency. Nevertheless, additional support may be needed to prevent telehealth from exacerbating health inequities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化远程医疗服务:在社区卫生中心患者中进行的混合方法需求评估。
背景:新冠肺炎大流行增加了联邦资助的社区卫生中心(CHC)的远程医疗服务。然而,人们对CHC患者使用的常见决定因素知之甚少。目的:我们调查了1个大型CHC网络的患者参与者对远程医疗的使用情况,该网络为中西部城市和郊区服务不足的人群提供护理。方法:我们利用顺序解释设计进行了一项混合方法研究。参与者是讲英语和/或西班牙语的成年人,他们在12个月的时间里为自己或孩子在任何练习地点参加了≥1次的访问。研究人员对符合条件的成年人进行了一项结构化的电话调查。该结果随后促进了对远程医疗“用户”和“非用户”进行有针对性的抽样,以进行定性电话采访。结果:调查参与者包括500名成年人。大多数人能够获得利用远程医疗所需的资源,包括智能手机(90.4%)和家庭互联网(83.0%)。大约一半(50.8%)的人“很少或从未”在网速、可靠性或质量方面存在问题。大多数患者(81.1%)知道患者门户,59.8%的患者使用过视频就诊。会说西班牙语且英语水平有限的参与者面临着一些最大的障碍。定性访谈参与者包括12名远程医疗用户和12名非远程医疗用户。用户发现远程医疗既方便又高效,而非用户则缺乏对远程医疗服务如何有益的认识,或者注册、加入或使用远程医疗需要帮助。结论:大多数参与者拥有使用远程医疗服务所需的资源和意识。使用它们的人欣赏它们的便利性和效率。然而,可能需要额外的支持,以防止远程医疗加剧健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Homelessness With Primary Care and Acute Care Utilization Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth. Clinical Outcomes Among High-Risk Primary Care Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Methodological Challenges and Results From the STOP-DKD Study. Children and Youth Are a Critical Part of the American Story of Homelessness. Trajectories and Transitions in Service Use Among Older Veterans at High Risk of Long-Term Institutional Care. Conduct of Large, Multisite, Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Studies: Learnings From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Palliative Care Learning Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1