Treatment of severe malaria with artemisinin derivatives. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

H M McIntosh, P Olliaro
{"title":"Treatment of severe malaria with artemisinin derivatives. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"H M McIntosh, P Olliaro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review of randomised or pseudorandomised trials aimed at summarising the effectiveness and safety of artemisinin drugs for treating severe falciparum malaria in adults and children. Survival was better with artemisinin drugs in 1.265 patients compared with 1.183 treated with quinine (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84). However, the difference is barely significant when only studies with adequate concealment of allocation at enrolment are included in the analysis (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.98). In 1784 patients with cerebral malaria, mortality was also lower with artemisinin drugs overall (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.90), but not significantly better than quinine in studies reporting adequate concealment of allocation. No difference in neurological sequelae has been demonstrated. Artemisinin drugs clear parasites from the blood faster than quinine. Adverse effects are similarly common with artemisinin drugs and quinine, although reporting varies between trials. There is no evidence from this review that any one artemisinin derivative is better than the others, but comparative studies are few, small and heterogeneous.</p>","PeriodicalId":94134,"journal":{"name":"Medecine tropicale : revue du Corps de sante colonial","volume":"58 3 Suppl","pages":"61-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine tropicale : revue du Corps de sante colonial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review of randomised or pseudorandomised trials aimed at summarising the effectiveness and safety of artemisinin drugs for treating severe falciparum malaria in adults and children. Survival was better with artemisinin drugs in 1.265 patients compared with 1.183 treated with quinine (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84). However, the difference is barely significant when only studies with adequate concealment of allocation at enrolment are included in the analysis (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.98). In 1784 patients with cerebral malaria, mortality was also lower with artemisinin drugs overall (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.90), but not significantly better than quinine in studies reporting adequate concealment of allocation. No difference in neurological sequelae has been demonstrated. Artemisinin drugs clear parasites from the blood faster than quinine. Adverse effects are similarly common with artemisinin drugs and quinine, although reporting varies between trials. There is no evidence from this review that any one artemisinin derivative is better than the others, but comparative studies are few, small and heterogeneous.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青蒿素衍生物治疗严重疟疾。随机对照试验的系统综述。
这项随机或伪随机试验的系统综述旨在总结青蒿素药物治疗成人和儿童严重恶性疟疾的有效性和安全性。与使用奎宁治疗的1.183名患者相比,使用青蒿素药物治疗的1.265名患者的生存率更好(OR:0.68;95%CI:0.55-0.84)。然而,当分析中仅包括在入组时充分隐瞒分配的研究时,差异几乎不显著(OR:0.77;95%CI:0.61-0.98)。在1784名脑型疟疾患者中,青蒿素类药物的总体死亡率也较低(OR:0.70;95%CI:0.55-0.90),但在报告充分隐瞒分配的研究中并不显著优于奎宁。神经系统后遗症没有差异。青蒿素类药物清除血液中寄生虫的速度比奎宁快。青蒿素类药物和奎宁的不良反应同样常见,尽管不同试验的报告不同。这篇综述没有证据表明任何一种青蒿素衍生物比其他衍生物更好,但比较研究很少,规模小,而且是异质性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of severe malaria with artemisinin derivatives. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1