Development of a Needs-Based Planning Model to Estimate Required Capacity of a Substance Use Treatment System.

Brian Rush, Joël Tremblay, David Brown
{"title":"Development of a Needs-Based Planning Model to Estimate Required Capacity of a Substance Use Treatment System.","authors":"Brian Rush, Joël Tremblay, David Brown","doi":"10.15288/jsads.2019.s18.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Substance use services and supports have traditionally been funded without the benefit of a comprehensive, quantitative planning model closely aligned with population needs. This article describes the methodology used to develop and refine key features of such a model, gives an overview of the resulting Canadian prototype, and offers examples and lessons learned in pilot work.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The need for treatment was defined according to five categories of problem severity derived from national survey data and anticipated levels of help-seeking estimated from a narrative synthesis of international literature. A pan-Canadian Delphi procedure was used to allocate this help-seeking population across an agreed-upon set of treatment service categories, which included three levels each of withdrawal management, community, and residential treatment services. Projections of need and required service capacity for Canadian health planning regions were derived using synthetic estimation by age and gender. The model and gap analyses were piloted in nine regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>National distribution of need was estimated as Tier 1: 80.7%; Tier 2: 10.4%; Tier 3: 6.1%; Tier 4: 2.6%; and Tier 5: 0.2%. Pilot work of the full estimation protocol, including gap analysis, showed the results triangulated with other indicators of need and were useful for local planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lessons learned from pilot testing were identified, including challenges with the model itself and those associated with its implementation. The process of estimation developed in this Canadian prototype, and the specifics of the model itself, can be adapted to other jurisdictions and contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","volume":"Sup 18 ","pages":"51-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2019.s18.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Substance use services and supports have traditionally been funded without the benefit of a comprehensive, quantitative planning model closely aligned with population needs. This article describes the methodology used to develop and refine key features of such a model, gives an overview of the resulting Canadian prototype, and offers examples and lessons learned in pilot work.

Method: The need for treatment was defined according to five categories of problem severity derived from national survey data and anticipated levels of help-seeking estimated from a narrative synthesis of international literature. A pan-Canadian Delphi procedure was used to allocate this help-seeking population across an agreed-upon set of treatment service categories, which included three levels each of withdrawal management, community, and residential treatment services. Projections of need and required service capacity for Canadian health planning regions were derived using synthetic estimation by age and gender. The model and gap analyses were piloted in nine regions.

Results: National distribution of need was estimated as Tier 1: 80.7%; Tier 2: 10.4%; Tier 3: 6.1%; Tier 4: 2.6%; and Tier 5: 0.2%. Pilot work of the full estimation protocol, including gap analysis, showed the results triangulated with other indicators of need and were useful for local planning.

Conclusions: Lessons learned from pilot testing were identified, including challenges with the model itself and those associated with its implementation. The process of estimation developed in this Canadian prototype, and the specifics of the model itself, can be adapted to other jurisdictions and contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发基于需求的规划模型,以评估物质使用治疗系统的所需能力。
目标:药物使用服务和支持传统上是在没有与人口需求密切相关的全面、定量规划模式的情况下提供资金的。本文描述了用于开发和完善这种模型的关键特征的方法,概述了由此产生的加拿大原型,并提供了试点工作中的例子和经验教训。方法:根据国家调查数据得出的五类问题严重程度和国际文献叙述综合估计的预期求助水平来确定治疗需求。使用泛加拿大德尔菲程序将寻求帮助的人群分配到一组商定的治疗服务类别中,其中包括三个级别,分别是戒断管理、社区和住院治疗服务。加拿大卫生规划区域的需求和所需服务能力预测是根据年龄和性别综合估计得出的。该模型和差距分析在九个区域进行了试点。结果:全国需求分布估计为一级:80.7%;二级:10.4%;第三层:6.1%;第4层:2.6%;第5级:0.2%。包括差距分析在内的全面评估协议的试点工作表明,结果与其他需求指标呈三角关系,对地方规划有用。结论:确定了从试点测试中吸取的经验教训,包括模型本身的挑战以及与实施相关的挑战。这个加拿大原型中开发的估算过程以及模型本身的细节可以适应其他司法管辖区和环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Youth Cognitive Responses to Alcohol Promotional Messaging: A Systematic Review. Alcohol Marketing and Adolescent and Young Adult Alcohol Use Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies. Exposure to Digital Alcohol Marketing and Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review. A Neurobiological Model of Alcohol Marketing Effects on Underage Drinking. Psychological Processes Underlying Effects of Alcohol Marketing on Youth Drinking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1