Disparities in cannabis use outcomes, perceived risks and social norms across sexual orientation groups of US young adult women and men.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Health Education Research Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1093/her/cyad038
Katelyn F Romm, Amy M Cohn, Laura A Beebe, Carla J Berg
{"title":"Disparities in cannabis use outcomes, perceived risks and social norms across sexual orientation groups of US young adult women and men.","authors":"Katelyn F Romm, Amy M Cohn, Laura A Beebe, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.1093/her/cyad038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little research has examined mechanisms driving cannabis use disparities among sexual minority (SM; versus heterosexual) young adults (YAs). Participants were US YA women (N = 1345; 24.8% bisexual, 6.1% lesbian) and men (N = 998: 8.9% bisexual, 13.8% gay). Bivariate analyses examined associations between sexual orientation (heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual) and cannabis use outcomes (past 30-day [current] use, use frequency, cannabis-tobacco dual use, use intentions), perceived risks (harm, addictiveness) and social norms (social acceptability, peer use). Regressions examined sexual orientation, perceived risks and social norms as correlates of cannabis outcomes. Bisexual and lesbian (versus heterosexual) women reported lower cannabis-related perceived risks, greater social norms and higher odds of current use. Bisexual (versus heterosexual) women reported more days of use, higher odds of cannabis-tobacco dual use and greater use intentions. Gay (versus heterosexual) men reported lower perceived addictiveness, greater social norms and higher odds of current use. Lower perceived risks and greater social norms predicted greater use outcomes for women and men. Bisexual women displayed higher odds of several cannabis use outcomes, whereas lesbian women and gay men displayed higher odds of current cannabis use only. Cannabis-related perceptions and social norms may be important targets for public health messaging for SMYAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":" ","pages":"513-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyad038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little research has examined mechanisms driving cannabis use disparities among sexual minority (SM; versus heterosexual) young adults (YAs). Participants were US YA women (N = 1345; 24.8% bisexual, 6.1% lesbian) and men (N = 998: 8.9% bisexual, 13.8% gay). Bivariate analyses examined associations between sexual orientation (heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual) and cannabis use outcomes (past 30-day [current] use, use frequency, cannabis-tobacco dual use, use intentions), perceived risks (harm, addictiveness) and social norms (social acceptability, peer use). Regressions examined sexual orientation, perceived risks and social norms as correlates of cannabis outcomes. Bisexual and lesbian (versus heterosexual) women reported lower cannabis-related perceived risks, greater social norms and higher odds of current use. Bisexual (versus heterosexual) women reported more days of use, higher odds of cannabis-tobacco dual use and greater use intentions. Gay (versus heterosexual) men reported lower perceived addictiveness, greater social norms and higher odds of current use. Lower perceived risks and greater social norms predicted greater use outcomes for women and men. Bisexual women displayed higher odds of several cannabis use outcomes, whereas lesbian women and gay men displayed higher odds of current cannabis use only. Cannabis-related perceptions and social norms may be important targets for public health messaging for SMYAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国年轻成年男女性取向群体在大麻使用结果、感知风险和社会规范方面的差异。
很少有研究调查导致性少数群体(SM;与异性恋)年轻人(YA)大麻使用差异的机制。参与者为美国亚裔女性(N = 1345;24.8%为双性恋,6.1%为女同性恋)和男性(N = 998:8.9%为双性恋,13.8%为同性恋)。双变量分析考察了性取向(异性恋、男同性恋、双性恋)与大麻使用结果(过去30天[当前]使用、使用频率、大麻烟草双重使用、使用意图)、感知风险(伤害、成瘾性)和社会规范(社会可接受性、同伴使用)之间的关系。回归调查了性取向、感知风险和社会规范与大麻结果的相关性。双性恋和女同性恋(与异性恋相比)女性报告称,与大麻相关的感知风险较低,社会规范较高,目前使用大麻的几率较高。双性恋(与异性恋)女性报告说,她们使用大麻的天数更多,大麻和烟草双重使用的几率更高,使用意愿更大。同性恋(与异性恋)男性报告称,他们的成瘾感较低,社会规范较高,目前使用的几率较高。较低的感知风险和较高的社会规范预测了女性和男性更大的使用结果。双性恋女性多次使用大麻的几率更高,而女同性恋和男同性恋目前仅使用大麻的可能性更高。与大麻有关的观念和社会规范可能是SMYA公共卫生信息的重要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
期刊最新文献
The outcome of diabetic retinopathy health education program in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a quasi-experimental study. The effect of motivational interview-based breastfeeding education on breastfeeding motivation, success, self-efficacy perceptions, and exclusive breastfeeding duration after cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Correction to: Examining the impact of a leisure time intervention on participation in organized out-of-school activities among adolescents: a quasi-experimental study in Franklin County, KY, USA. Breastfeeding interventions and programs conducted in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a scoping review. Associations between noticing public health education campaigns about cannabis and risk perceptions in the northern Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1