Diagnostic Value of CD25, CD69, and CD134 on Tuberculosis-Specific Antigen-Stimulated CD4+ T Cells for Tuberculous Pleurisy.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Immunology Research Pub Date : 2023-09-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/5309816
Hanlu Shi, Liping Yang, Fujie Zhang, Yu Zhou, Yonglie Zhou
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of CD25, CD69, and CD134 on Tuberculosis-Specific Antigen-Stimulated CD4+ T Cells for Tuberculous Pleurisy.","authors":"Hanlu Shi,&nbsp;Liping Yang,&nbsp;Fujie Zhang,&nbsp;Yu Zhou,&nbsp;Yonglie Zhou","doi":"10.1155/2023/5309816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid and accurate methods for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy (TP) are urgently needed. Activation markers of tuberculosis (TB)-reactive T cells are considered promising for the diagnosis of active TB (ATB). Different activation indexes may play different roles in the progression of TB, but there are few reports on T cell activation indicators, except for HLA-DR. Hence, we evaluated the expression of early (CD25 and CD69) and late (CD134) activation markers on TB antigen-stimulated CD4+ T cells in populations with different TB infection status and investigated their diagnostic value for ATB, particularly, for TP. Moreover, we compared the differences in the diagnostic efficacy among the indexes from peripheral blood (PB) and pleural fluid (PF) for TP. The expression of each activation marker was significantly increased in TB-infected populations (patients with ATB and latent TB infection vs. healthy individuals; patients with TP vs. non-TP) and was significantly higher in the PF than in the PB of patients with TP. The diagnostic performance of the coexpressed activation markers was superior to that of single expression markers in the differential diagnosis of ATB and non-TB, with CD25+CD134+ showing the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC: 0.93, 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; sensitivity: 86.7%, 95% CI, 72.5%-94.5%; and specificity: 94.0%, 95% CI, 82.5%-98.4%). Except for TB-IGRA, the activation indexes were more accurate than conventional laboratory methods for ATB diagnosis. In addition, the expression of CD25+CD134+ in PB and PF was the best values for differential diagnosis of TP and NTP, with AUCs of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00), respectively. Our study provides information on the diagnostic value of different activation markers for TB and shows that the expression of CD25+CD134+ on CD4+ T cells in PF can serve as a potential marker for TP diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15952,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5309816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid and accurate methods for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy (TP) are urgently needed. Activation markers of tuberculosis (TB)-reactive T cells are considered promising for the diagnosis of active TB (ATB). Different activation indexes may play different roles in the progression of TB, but there are few reports on T cell activation indicators, except for HLA-DR. Hence, we evaluated the expression of early (CD25 and CD69) and late (CD134) activation markers on TB antigen-stimulated CD4+ T cells in populations with different TB infection status and investigated their diagnostic value for ATB, particularly, for TP. Moreover, we compared the differences in the diagnostic efficacy among the indexes from peripheral blood (PB) and pleural fluid (PF) for TP. The expression of each activation marker was significantly increased in TB-infected populations (patients with ATB and latent TB infection vs. healthy individuals; patients with TP vs. non-TP) and was significantly higher in the PF than in the PB of patients with TP. The diagnostic performance of the coexpressed activation markers was superior to that of single expression markers in the differential diagnosis of ATB and non-TB, with CD25+CD134+ showing the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC: 0.93, 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; sensitivity: 86.7%, 95% CI, 72.5%-94.5%; and specificity: 94.0%, 95% CI, 82.5%-98.4%). Except for TB-IGRA, the activation indexes were more accurate than conventional laboratory methods for ATB diagnosis. In addition, the expression of CD25+CD134+ in PB and PF was the best values for differential diagnosis of TP and NTP, with AUCs of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00), respectively. Our study provides information on the diagnostic value of different activation markers for TB and shows that the expression of CD25+CD134+ on CD4+ T cells in PF can serve as a potential marker for TP diagnosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CD25、CD69和CD134对结核特异性抗原刺激的CD4+T细胞对结核性胸膜炎的诊断价值。
迫切需要快速准确的方法来诊断结核性胸膜炎。结核病(TB)反应性T细胞的激活标记物被认为有希望用于诊断活动性结核病(ATB)。不同的活化指标可能在TB的进展中发挥不同的作用,但除了HLA-DR外,关于T细胞活化指标的报道很少。因此,我们评估了不同结核病感染状态人群中结核病抗原刺激的CD4+T细胞上早期(CD25和CD69)和晚期(CD134)激活标记物的表达,并研究了它们对ATB,特别是TP的诊断价值。此外,我们还比较了外周血(PB)和胸膜液(PF)指标对TP的诊断效果差异。每种激活标志物的表达在结核病感染人群中显著增加(ATB和潜伏性结核病感染患者与健康人相比;TP患者与非TP患者相比),并且在PF中显著高于TP患者的PB。在ATB和非TB的鉴别诊断中,共表达激活标记物的诊断性能优于单表达标记物,CD25+CD134+显示出最佳的诊断效率(AUC:0.93,95%CI,0.87-0.99;敏感性:86.7%,95%CI;72.5%-94.5%;特异性:94.0%,95%CI:82.5%-98.4%),活化指标对ATB的诊断比传统的实验室方法更准确。此外,PB和PF中CD25+CD134+的表达是TP和NTP鉴别诊断的最佳值,AUCs分别为0.87(95%CI,0.77-0.96)和0.95(95%CI:0.90-1.00)。我们的研究提供了不同激活标志物对结核病诊断价值的信息,并表明PF中CD4+T细胞上CD25+CD134+的表达可以作为TP诊断的潜在标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
423
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Immunology Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a platform for scientists and clinicians working in different areas of immunology and therapy. The journal publishes research articles, review articles, as well as clinical studies related to classical immunology, molecular immunology, clinical immunology, cancer immunology, transplantation immunology, immune pathology, immunodeficiency, autoimmune diseases, immune disorders, and immunotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Single-Chain Variable Fragment Antibody: Role in Future Therapeutic and Diagnostic Biologics. Taz/Tead1 Promotes Alternative Macrophage Activation and Kidney Fibrosis via Transcriptional Upregulation of Smad3. Promoting Articular Cartilage Regeneration through Microenvironmental Regulation. Exosome-Derived microRNA: Potential Target for Diagnosis and Treatment of Sepsis. Breastfeeding and Neonatal Age Influence Neutrophil-Driven Ontogeny of Blood Cell Populations in the First Week of Human Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1