(De)Stigmatizing Depression on Social Media: The Role of Responsibility Frames.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Health Communication Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1080/10810730.2023.2266702
Sophia Schaller, Annemarie Wiedicke, Doreen Reifegerste, Linn Julia Temmann
{"title":"(De)Stigmatizing Depression on Social Media: The Role of Responsibility Frames.","authors":"Sophia Schaller, Annemarie Wiedicke, Doreen Reifegerste, Linn Julia Temmann","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2023.2266702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Responsibility frames on social media could shape recipients' responses toward people with depression, which is crucial for the public (de)stigmatization of the mental disorder. Thus, the present study examines the effects of different responsibility frames (individual, social, combination) in Instagram-posts about depression on respondents' related attributions as well as their emotional and behavioral reactions toward people suffering from the illness. Our online-experiment (<i>N</i> = 1,015) revealed that frames emphasizing the responsibility of one's social network (e.g. family, friends and professionals) for depression, i.e. social frames, strengthened participants' attributions to the social network, i.e. social attributions, most effectively. Individual frames, however, primarily intensified individual attributions to those affected by depression. Contrary to previous findings, a combination frame did not prove to increase recipients' social attributions more than a one-sided social frame. For emotional and behavioral responses, we did not find any effects of responsibility frames compared to the control group-possibly due to buffering effects of the narrative structure of the Instagram posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"757-767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2266702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responsibility frames on social media could shape recipients' responses toward people with depression, which is crucial for the public (de)stigmatization of the mental disorder. Thus, the present study examines the effects of different responsibility frames (individual, social, combination) in Instagram-posts about depression on respondents' related attributions as well as their emotional and behavioral reactions toward people suffering from the illness. Our online-experiment (N = 1,015) revealed that frames emphasizing the responsibility of one's social network (e.g. family, friends and professionals) for depression, i.e. social frames, strengthened participants' attributions to the social network, i.e. social attributions, most effectively. Individual frames, however, primarily intensified individual attributions to those affected by depression. Contrary to previous findings, a combination frame did not prove to increase recipients' social attributions more than a one-sided social frame. For emotional and behavioral responses, we did not find any effects of responsibility frames compared to the control group-possibly due to buffering effects of the narrative structure of the Instagram posts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(德)社交媒体上的污名化抑郁症:责任框架的作用。
社交媒体上的责任框架可能会影响接受者对抑郁症患者的反应,这对公众(去)污名化精神障碍至关重要。因此,本研究考察了Instagram上关于抑郁症的帖子中不同责任框架(个人、社会、组合)对受访者相关归因以及他们对患者的情绪和行为反应的影响。我们的在线实验(N = 1015)揭示,强调一个人的社交网络(如家人、朋友和专业人士)对抑郁症的责任的框架,即社交框架,最有效地加强了参与者对社交网络的归因,即社交归因。然而,个体框架主要强化了对受抑郁影响者的个体归因。与之前的研究结果相反,组合框架并没有比单方面的社会框架更能增加接受者的社会归因。对于情绪和行为反应,与对照组相比,我们没有发现责任框架的任何影响,这可能是由于Instagram帖子叙事结构的缓冲作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Rationality: Information Overload and Biased Perceptions of Lung Cancer Screening Among Middle-Aged Adults. Clinical AI Applications in the Context of Cancer: Explaining Openness to Information and Consent to Use Through Risk Perceptions and Efficacy Beliefs. From Knowledge to Action: Effects of HPV Knowledge, HPV Vaccine Attitude, Gender, and HPV Vaccine Safety Concerns on HPV Vaccination Intent. Does Misinformation Have Spillover Effects on Unrelated Health Behaviors? Promising Null Results from a Longitudinal Study of U.S. Adults. Health Communication at a Crossroads as the Journal of Health Communication Begins Its 4th Decade of Publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1