Targeted memory reactivation during slow-wave sleep vs. sleep stage N2: no significant differences in a vocabulary task.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Learning & memory Pub Date : 2023-09-19 Print Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.053683.122
Anna Wick, Björn Rasch
{"title":"Targeted memory reactivation during slow-wave sleep vs. sleep stage N2: no significant differences in a vocabulary task.","authors":"Anna Wick, Björn Rasch","doi":"10.1101/lm.053683.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep supports memory consolidation, and slow-wave sleep (SWS) in particular is assumed to benefit the consolidation of verbal learning material. Re-exposure to previously learned words during SWS with a technique known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR) consistently benefits memory. However, TMR has also been successfully applied during sleep stage N2, though a direct comparison between words selectively reactivated during SWS versus N2 is still missing. Here, we directly compared the effects of N2 TMR and SWS TMR on memory performance in a vocabulary learning task in a within-subject design. Thirty-four healthy young participants (21 in the main sample and 13 in an additional sample) learned 120 Dutch-German word pairs before sleep. Participants in the main sample slept for ∼8 h during the night, while participants in the additional sample slept ∼3 h. We reactivated the Dutch words selectively during N2 and SWS in one single night. Forty words were not cued. Participants in the main sample recalled the German translations of the Dutch words after sleep in the morning, while those in the additional sample did so at 2:00 a.m. As expected, we observed no differences in recall performance between words reactivated during N2 and SWS. However, we failed to find an overall memory benefit of reactivated over nonreactivated words. Detailed time-frequency analyses showed that words played during N2 elicited stronger characteristic oscillatory responses in several frequency bands, including spindle and theta frequencies, compared with SWS. These oscillatory responses did not vary with the memory strengths of individual words. Our results question the robustness and replicability of the TMR benefit on memory using our Dutch vocabulary learning task. We discuss potential boundary conditions for vocabulary reactivation paradigms and, most importantly, see the need for further replication studies, ideally including multiple laboratories and larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18003,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory","volume":"30 9","pages":"192-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053683.122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep supports memory consolidation, and slow-wave sleep (SWS) in particular is assumed to benefit the consolidation of verbal learning material. Re-exposure to previously learned words during SWS with a technique known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR) consistently benefits memory. However, TMR has also been successfully applied during sleep stage N2, though a direct comparison between words selectively reactivated during SWS versus N2 is still missing. Here, we directly compared the effects of N2 TMR and SWS TMR on memory performance in a vocabulary learning task in a within-subject design. Thirty-four healthy young participants (21 in the main sample and 13 in an additional sample) learned 120 Dutch-German word pairs before sleep. Participants in the main sample slept for ∼8 h during the night, while participants in the additional sample slept ∼3 h. We reactivated the Dutch words selectively during N2 and SWS in one single night. Forty words were not cued. Participants in the main sample recalled the German translations of the Dutch words after sleep in the morning, while those in the additional sample did so at 2:00 a.m. As expected, we observed no differences in recall performance between words reactivated during N2 and SWS. However, we failed to find an overall memory benefit of reactivated over nonreactivated words. Detailed time-frequency analyses showed that words played during N2 elicited stronger characteristic oscillatory responses in several frequency bands, including spindle and theta frequencies, compared with SWS. These oscillatory responses did not vary with the memory strengths of individual words. Our results question the robustness and replicability of the TMR benefit on memory using our Dutch vocabulary learning task. We discuss potential boundary conditions for vocabulary reactivation paradigms and, most importantly, see the need for further replication studies, ideally including multiple laboratories and larger sample sizes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢波睡眠与睡眠阶段N2的定向记忆再激活:词汇任务没有显著差异。
睡眠支持记忆巩固,尤其是慢波睡眠(SWS)被认为有利于巩固语言学习材料。在SWS过程中,通过一种称为目标记忆再激活(TMR)的技术,再次接触以前学习过的单词始终有利于记忆。然而,TMR也已在睡眠阶段N2期间成功应用,尽管在SWS期间选择性地重新激活的字与N2之间的直接比较仍然缺失。在这里,我们直接比较了在主题内设计的词汇学习任务中,N2 TMR和SWS TMR对记忆性能的影响。34名健康的年轻参与者(21名在主样本中,13名在附加样本中)在睡觉前学习了120个荷兰语-德语单词对。主样本中的参与者在夜间睡了~8小时,而附加样本中的与会者睡了~3小时。我们在一个晚上的N2和SWS期间选择性地重新激活了荷兰语单词。没有提示40个单词。主样本的参与者在早上睡觉后回忆荷兰语单词的德语翻译,而附加样本的参与者则在凌晨2:00回忆。不出所料,我们观察到N2和SWS期间重新激活的单词之间的回忆表现没有差异。然而,我们没有发现重新激活的单词比未激活的单词有更大的记忆力优势。详细的时频分析表明,与SWS相比,N2期间播放的单词在几个频带(包括纺锤和θ频率)上引发了更强的特征振荡响应。这些振荡反应不随单个单词的记忆强度而变化。使用我们的荷兰语词汇学习任务,我们的结果对TMR在记忆方面的益处的稳健性和可复制性提出了质疑。我们讨论了词汇再激活范式的潜在边界条件,最重要的是,我们看到了进一步复制研究的必要性,理想情况下包括多个实验室和更大的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning & memory
Learning & memory 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The neurobiology of learning and memory is entering a new interdisciplinary era. Advances in neuropsychology have identified regions of brain tissue that are critical for certain types of function. Electrophysiological techniques have revealed behavioral correlates of neuronal activity. Studies of synaptic plasticity suggest that some mechanisms of memory formation may resemble those of neural development. And molecular approaches have identified genes with patterns of expression that influence behavior. It is clear that future progress depends on interdisciplinary investigations. The current literature of learning and memory is large but fragmented. Until now, there has been no single journal devoted to this area of study and no dominant journal that demands attention by serious workers in the area, regardless of specialty. Learning & Memory provides a forum for these investigations in the form of research papers and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Integration of conditioned threat with pre-existing memories. Positive affect amplifies integration within episodic memories in the laboratory and the real world. The influence of exposure to early-life adversity on agency-modulated reinforcement learning. Early life racial/ethnic discrimination effects on behavioral control and health outcomes in young adults. Exploring stress hormone effects on memory specificity and strength in mice using the dual-event inhibitory avoidance task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1