{"title":"Usefulness and difficulties with the thiopurine pharmacogenomic NUDT15 genotyping test: Analysis of real-world data in Japan","authors":"Yoichi Kakuta , Motohiro Kato , Yusuke Shimoyama , Takeo Naito , Rintaro Moroi , Masatake Kuroha , Hisashi Shiga , Yoshitaka Kinouchi , Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.1016/j.jphs.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The usefulness of <em>NUDT15</em> genotyping as a pharmacogenomic test for thiopurine has been established. The first such test developed to date, <em>NUDT15</em> genotyping was approved for reimbursement in Japan in February 2019 for all indicated patients. We retrospectively examined claims data in Japan and confirmed that the proportion of patients who undergo genotyping before initiating a new thiopurine regimen has increased; furthermore, genotyping has improved the rate of treatment continuation and reduced on-treatment hospitalization. However, the genotyping rate before thiopurine induction was >50% for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and <20% for those with other immune-related diseases, indicating significant variation by disease field. Additionally, over 10% of tests were found to have been performed inappropriately, such as multiple genotyping of the same patient or testing more than 2 weeks after starting treatment. Although <em>NUDT15</em> genotyping for patients requiring thiopurine treatment has been shown to improve thiopurine treatment continuation rate, measures are required to address the systematic issues identified in our analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological sciences","volume":"153 3","pages":"Pages 161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347861323000555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The usefulness of NUDT15 genotyping as a pharmacogenomic test for thiopurine has been established. The first such test developed to date, NUDT15 genotyping was approved for reimbursement in Japan in February 2019 for all indicated patients. We retrospectively examined claims data in Japan and confirmed that the proportion of patients who undergo genotyping before initiating a new thiopurine regimen has increased; furthermore, genotyping has improved the rate of treatment continuation and reduced on-treatment hospitalization. However, the genotyping rate before thiopurine induction was >50% for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and <20% for those with other immune-related diseases, indicating significant variation by disease field. Additionally, over 10% of tests were found to have been performed inappropriately, such as multiple genotyping of the same patient or testing more than 2 weeks after starting treatment. Although NUDT15 genotyping for patients requiring thiopurine treatment has been shown to improve thiopurine treatment continuation rate, measures are required to address the systematic issues identified in our analysis.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pharmacological Sciences (JPS) is an international open access journal intended for the advancement of pharmacological sciences in the world. The Journal welcomes submissions in all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology, including neuroscience, and biochemical, cellular, and molecular pharmacology for publication as Reviews, Full Papers or Short Communications. Short Communications are short research article intended to provide novel and exciting pharmacological findings. Manuscripts concerning descriptive case reports, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies without pharmacological mechanism and dose-response determinations are not acceptable and will be rejected without peer review. The ethnopharmacological studies are also out of the scope of this journal. Furthermore, JPS does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unknown chemical composition.