Response-dependent point loss and response force as disrupting operations on behavioral resistance to change in humans

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1002/jeab.885
Carlos Eduardo Costa, André Connor de Méo Luiz, Lucas Franco Carmona, Guilherme Dutra Ponce, Roberto Alves Banaco, Kennon A. Lattal
{"title":"Response-dependent point loss and response force as disrupting operations on behavioral resistance to change in humans","authors":"Carlos Eduardo Costa,&nbsp;André Connor de Méo Luiz,&nbsp;Lucas Franco Carmona,&nbsp;Guilherme Dutra Ponce,&nbsp;Roberto Alves Banaco,&nbsp;Kennon A. Lattal","doi":"10.1002/jeab.885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavioral momentum theory (BMT) provides a theoretical and methodological framework for understanding how differentially maintained operant responding resists disruption. A common way to test operant resistance involves contingencies with suppressive effects, such as extinction or prefeeding. Other contingencies with known suppressive effects, such as response-cost procedures arranged as point-loss or increases in response force, remain untested as disruptive events within the BMT framework. In the present set of three experiments, responding of humans was maintained by point accumulation programmed according to a multiple variable-interval (VI) VI schedule with different reinforcement rates in either of two components. Subsequently, subtracting a point following each response (Experiment 1) or increasing the force required for the response to be registered (Experiments 2 and 3 decreased response rates, but responding was less disrupted in the component associated with the higher reinforcement rate. The point-loss contingency and increased response force similarly affected response rates by suppressing responding and human persistence, replicating previous findings with humans and nonhuman animals when other types of disruptive events (e.g., extinction and prefeeding) were investigated. The present findings moreover extend the generality of the effects of reinforcement rate on persistence, and thus BMT, extending the analysis of resistance to two well-known manipulations used to reduce responding in the experimental analysis of behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral momentum theory (BMT) provides a theoretical and methodological framework for understanding how differentially maintained operant responding resists disruption. A common way to test operant resistance involves contingencies with suppressive effects, such as extinction or prefeeding. Other contingencies with known suppressive effects, such as response-cost procedures arranged as point-loss or increases in response force, remain untested as disruptive events within the BMT framework. In the present set of three experiments, responding of humans was maintained by point accumulation programmed according to a multiple variable-interval (VI) VI schedule with different reinforcement rates in either of two components. Subsequently, subtracting a point following each response (Experiment 1) or increasing the force required for the response to be registered (Experiments 2 and 3 decreased response rates, but responding was less disrupted in the component associated with the higher reinforcement rate. The point-loss contingency and increased response force similarly affected response rates by suppressing responding and human persistence, replicating previous findings with humans and nonhuman animals when other types of disruptive events (e.g., extinction and prefeeding) were investigated. The present findings moreover extend the generality of the effects of reinforcement rate on persistence, and thus BMT, extending the analysis of resistance to two well-known manipulations used to reduce responding in the experimental analysis of behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反应依赖性失分和反应力作为干扰人类行为抵抗力的操作。
行为动量理论(BMT)为理解差异维持的操作性反应如何抵抗干扰提供了一个理论和方法框架。测试操作性抵抗力的一种常见方法涉及具有抑制作用的突发事件,如灭绝或偏好。其他具有已知抑制作用的突发事件,如安排为失分或增加反应力的反应成本程序,在BMT框架内仍未作为破坏性事件进行测试。在本组三个实验中,人类的反应是通过根据多变量区间(VI)VI时间表编程的点累积来维持的,在两个成分中的任何一个成分中具有不同的强化率。随后减去每个响应后的一个点(实验1)或增加要记录的响应所需的力(实验2和3降低了反应率,但在与较高强化率相关的组件中,反应受到的干扰较小。失分事故和反应力的增加同样通过抑制反应和人类的持续性来影响反应率,在其他类型的破坏性事件中,复制了以前对人类和非人类动物的发现(例如灭绝和优先饲养)。此外,本发现扩展了强化率对持久性影响的一般性,从而扩展了BMT,将阻力分析扩展到了行为实验分析中用于减少反应的两种众所周知的操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
期刊最新文献
Experience with reduced-nicotine cigarettes and whether this decreases smoking and substitution for full-nicotine cigarettes. Zoographics in the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: Increasing inclusion of female animals. Ecological momentary assessment of delay discounting, reward valuation, and craving in very light cigarette users. Evaluation of resurgence following differential reinforcement of alternative behavior with and without extinction in a human operant model. Avoidance of hot air blast in Rattus norvegicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1