Which Psychological and Psychosocial Constructs Are Important to Measure in Future Tendinopathy Clinical Trials? A Modified International Delphi Study With Expert Clinician/Researchers and People With Tendinopathy.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2519/jospt.2023.11903
Carl Stubbs, Sean McAuliffe, Ruth L Chimenti, Brooke K Coombes, Terry Haines, Luke Heales, Robert Jan de Vos, Greg Lehman, Adrian Mallows, Lori A Michner, Neal L Millar, Seth O'Neill, Kieran O'Sullivan, Melanie Plinsinga, Michael Rathleff, Ebonie Rio, Megan Ross, Jean-Sebastien Roy, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Athol Thomson, Tim Trevail, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Bill Vicenzino, Johan W S Vlaeyen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Peter Malliaras
{"title":"Which Psychological and Psychosocial Constructs Are Important to Measure in Future Tendinopathy Clinical Trials? A Modified International Delphi Study With Expert Clinician/Researchers and People With Tendinopathy.","authors":"Carl Stubbs, Sean McAuliffe, Ruth L Chimenti, Brooke K Coombes, Terry Haines, Luke Heales, Robert Jan de Vos, Greg Lehman, Adrian Mallows, Lori A Michner, Neal L Millar, Seth O'Neill, Kieran O'Sullivan, Melanie Plinsinga, Michael Rathleff, Ebonie Rio, Megan Ross, Jean-Sebastien Roy, Karin Gravare Silbernagel, Athol Thomson, Tim Trevail, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Bill Vicenzino, Johan W S Vlaeyen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Peter Malliaras","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To identify which psychological and psychosocial constructs to include in a core outcome set to guide future clinical trials in the tendinopathy field. <b>DESIGN:</b> Modified International Delphi study. <b>METHODS:</b> In 3 online Delphi rounds, we presented 35 psychological and psychosocial constructs to an international panel of 38 clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy. Using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important to include, 9 = critical to include), consensus for construct inclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating \"<i>extremely critical to include</i>\" (score ≥7) and ≤15% rating \"<i>not important to include</i>\" (score ≤3). Consensus for exclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating \"<i>not important to include\"</i> (score ≤3) and ≤15% of rating \"critical to include\" (score ≥7). <b>RESULTS:</b> Thirty-six participants (95% of 38) completed round 1, 90% (n = 34) completed round 2, and 87% (n = 33) completed round 3. Four constructs were deemed important to include as part of a core outcome set: kinesiophobia (82%, median: 8, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0), pain beliefs (76%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0), pain-related self-efficacy (71%, median: 7, IQR: 2.0), and fear-avoidance beliefs (73%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0). Six constructs were deemed not important to include: perceived injustice (82%), individual attitudes of family members (74%), social isolation and loneliness (73%), job satisfaction (73%), coping (70%), and educational attainment (70%). Clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy reached consensus that kinesiophobia, pain beliefs, pain self-efficacy, and fear-avoidance beliefs were important psychological constructs to measure in tendinopathy clinical trials. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-12. Epub 20 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11903</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"14-25"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11903","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify which psychological and psychosocial constructs to include in a core outcome set to guide future clinical trials in the tendinopathy field. DESIGN: Modified International Delphi study. METHODS: In 3 online Delphi rounds, we presented 35 psychological and psychosocial constructs to an international panel of 38 clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy. Using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important to include, 9 = critical to include), consensus for construct inclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating "extremely critical to include" (score ≥7) and ≤15% rating "not important to include" (score ≤3). Consensus for exclusion required ≥70% of respondents rating "not important to include" (score ≤3) and ≤15% of rating "critical to include" (score ≥7). RESULTS: Thirty-six participants (95% of 38) completed round 1, 90% (n = 34) completed round 2, and 87% (n = 33) completed round 3. Four constructs were deemed important to include as part of a core outcome set: kinesiophobia (82%, median: 8, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0), pain beliefs (76%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0), pain-related self-efficacy (71%, median: 7, IQR: 2.0), and fear-avoidance beliefs (73%, median: -7, IQR: 1.0). Six constructs were deemed not important to include: perceived injustice (82%), individual attitudes of family members (74%), social isolation and loneliness (73%), job satisfaction (73%), coping (70%), and educational attainment (70%). Clinician/researchers and people with tendinopathy reached consensus that kinesiophobia, pain beliefs, pain self-efficacy, and fear-avoidance beliefs were important psychological constructs to measure in tendinopathy clinical trials. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-12. Epub 20 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11903.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在未来的腱病临床试验中,哪些心理和社会心理结构是重要的衡量标准?一项由专业临床医生/研究人员和肌腱病患者参与的改良国际德尔菲研究。
目的:确定哪些心理和社会心理结构应纳入核心结果集,以指导腱病领域未来的临床试验。设计:修改国际德尔菲研究。方法:在三轮德尔菲在线调查中,我们向一个由38名临床医生/研究人员和腱病患者组成的国际小组提出了35个心理和社会心理结构。使用9分Likert量表(1-不重要,9-关键,包括在内),对结构纳入的共识要求≥70%的受访者评分为“非常关键,包括”(得分≥7),≤15%的受访者评分“不重要,包括”。排除的一致性要求≥70%的受访者评分为“不重要,不包括在内”(得分≤3),≤15%的受访者评分“关键,不包括”(得分≥7)。结果:36名参与者(38人中的95%)完成了第一轮,90%(n=34)完成了第二轮,87%(n=33)完成了三轮。四个结构被认为是重要的,可以作为核心结果集的一部分:运动恐惧症(82%,中位数:8,四分位间距(IQR):1.0)、疼痛信念(76%,中位数:-7,IQR:1.0)、疼痛相关自我效能感(71%,中位数:7,IQR:2.0)和恐惧回避信念(73%,中位数:-7IQR:1.0,家庭成员的个人态度(74%)、社会孤立和孤独(73%)、工作满意度(73%),应对能力(70%)和教育程度(70%)。临床医生/研究人员和腱病患者达成共识,运动恐惧症、疼痛信念、疼痛自我效能感和恐惧回避信念是腱病临床试验中需要衡量的重要心理结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
期刊最新文献
Concussion Incidence by Type of Sport: Differences by Sex, Age Groups, Type of Session, and Level of Play An Overview of Systematic Reviews With Meta-analysis. Differential Effects of Quadriceps and Hip Muscle Exercises for Patellofemoral Pain: A Secondary Effect Modifier Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Improvements in Forward Bending Are Related to Improvements in Pain and Disability During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain. The Influence of "Labels" for Neck Pain on Recovery Expectations Following a Motor Vehicle Crash: An Online-Randomized Vignette-Based Experiment. Encouraging New Moms to Move More-Are We Missing the Mark? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Exercise Interventions on Postpartum Physical Activity Levels and Cardiorespiratory Fitness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1