首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Unmasking the Culprit: Reframing Pain in Research and Management of Patellofemoral Pain.
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.12883
Joachim Van Cant

SYNOPSIS: This editorial draws an analogy between the literary genre of the 'whodunit' and the complexities of patellofemoral pain (PFP). Traditionally, PFP management has centered on biomechanical factors such as hip muscle weakness, foot pronation, and patellar tracking issues. However, long-term outcomes often remain unsatisfactory, highlighting the need for alternative strategies. The editorial underscores the significance of addressing the predominant pain pathway rather than relying solely on biomechanical assessments. It calls for future research to integrate pain characteristics into clinical practice to enhance outcomes.Just as a mystery is difficult to solve by focusing on 1 suspect, PFP is a multifaceted condition arising from a variety of contributing factors, including pain pathways that are often overshadowed by biomechanics. By thoroughly examining the dimensions and characteristics of pain, clinicians and researchers can refine clinical strategies and advance patient care, and ensure a tailored approach to managing this challenging condition. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-3. Epub 15 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12883.

{"title":"Unmasking the Culprit: Reframing Pain in Research and Management of Patellofemoral Pain.","authors":"Joachim Van Cant","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12883","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.12883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>SYNOPSIS:</b> This editorial draws an analogy between the literary genre of the 'whodunit' and the complexities of patellofemoral pain (PFP). Traditionally, PFP management has centered on biomechanical factors such as hip muscle weakness, foot pronation, and patellar tracking issues. However, long-term outcomes often remain unsatisfactory, highlighting the need for alternative strategies. The editorial underscores the significance of addressing the predominant pain pathway rather than relying solely on biomechanical assessments. It calls for future research to integrate pain characteristics into clinical practice to enhance outcomes.Just as a mystery is difficult to solve by focusing on 1 suspect, PFP is a multifaceted condition arising from a variety of contributing factors, including pain pathways that are often overshadowed by biomechanics. By thoroughly examining the dimensions and characteristics of pain, clinicians and researchers can refine clinical strategies and advance patient care, and ensure a tailored approach to managing this challenging condition. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(2):1-3. Epub 15 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12883</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"75-77"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143048172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults: An Exploratory Analysis From the Dream Trial". 致编辑关于“早期手术与运动疗法对青年创伤性和非创伤性半月板撕裂的患者教育:来自梦试验的探索性分析”的回复。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.0201-R
Jonas Bloch Thorlund, Per Hölmich, Martin Lind, Søren T Skou

Author response to the JOSPT Letter to the Editor-in-Chief "Letter to the Editor Regarding "Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults-an Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial"" J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):71. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0201-R.

作者回复JOSPT致总编辑的信“关于“早期手术与运动治疗和青少年创伤性和非创伤性半月板撕裂的患者教育-来自DREAM试验的探索性分析”的致编辑的信”[J]骨科运动物理杂志,2025;55(1):71。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.0201-R。
{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding \"Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults: An Exploratory Analysis From the Dream Trial\".","authors":"Jonas Bloch Thorlund, Per Hölmich, Martin Lind, Søren T Skou","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0201-R","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.0201-R","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Author response to the <i>JOSPT</i> Letter to the Editor-in-Chief \"Letter to the Editor Regarding \"Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults-an Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial\"\" <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):71. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0201-R</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor Regarding "Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults: An Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial". 致编辑关于“青年创伤性和非创伤性半月板撕裂的早期手术与运动治疗和患者教育:来自DREAM试验的探索性分析”。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.0201
Tsai-Jung Chiang, Yu-Shan Fu

Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to JOSPT article "Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults-an Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial" by Damsted et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):70. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0201.

致JOSPT总编辑的信,回应Damsted等人的文章“青年创伤性和非创伤性半月板撕裂的早期手术与运动疗法和患者教育——来自DREAM试验的探索性分析”。[J] .体育学报,2015;55(1):70。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.0201。
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding \"Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults: An Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial\".","authors":"Tsai-Jung Chiang, Yu-Shan Fu","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.0201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to <i>JOSPT</i> article \"Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults-an Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial\" by Damsted et al. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):70. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0201</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two-Thirds Maintain High Adherence to Digital Education and Exercise Therapy With Comparable Outcomes Across Adherence Clusters: A Registry Study Including Data From Over 14 000 Patients in Sweden 三分之二的人保持对数字教育和运动治疗的高度依从性,在依从性集群中具有可比较的结果:一项包括瑞典14000多名患者数据的注册研究。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12864
Ali Kiadaliri, L Stefan Lohmander, Leif E Dahlberg

OBJECTIVE: To explore trajectories of 12-week adherence to a digital education and exercise therapy for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA), associations with baseline characteristics, and trajectories of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) up to 1-year follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort (registry) study. METHODS: Weekly data on adherence (ie, the percentage of completed activities [exercises, lessons, and quizzes]) were obtained over 12 weeks (n = 14 097). Longitudinal k-means clustering was used to identify adherence trajectory clusters. Associations of baseline characteristics with adherence trajectory clusters were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Trajectories of each PROM (pain, function, and general health) from baseline up to 1-year follow-up (measured at 3-month intervals) across adherence trajectory clusters were explored using generalized estimating equations adjusted for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Four adherence trajectory clusters were identified: "high-persistent" (68.0%), "high-declining" (16.6%), "moderate-increasing" (8.5%), and "moderate-declining" (6.9%). Multinomial logistic regression suggested that female sex, older age, lower body mass index, lower education, living outside metropolitan cities, higher level of physical activity, less anxiety/depression, no fear of movement, having walking difficulties, and higher readiness to do exercise were associated with a higher probability of assignment to "high-persistent" than other clusters. Beliefs/perceptions and sociodemographic factors accounted for most of the explained variation in adherence trajectory clusters. While "high-persistent" cluster generally reported better outcomes than other clusters, these differences were small. CONCLUSION: While there were variations in adherence to the digital treatment, participants reported clinically comparable PROMs regardless of their adherence trajectory cluster. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-12. Epub 22 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12864.

目的:探讨膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎(OA)数字教育和运动疗法 12 周坚持治疗的轨迹、与基线特征的关联以及随访 1 年的患者报告结果指标(PROMs)的轨迹。设计:回顾性队列(登记)研究。方法:在 12 周内获得每周的坚持情况数据(即完成活动 [练习、课程和测验] 的百分比)(n = 14 097)。采用纵向k均值聚类来识别坚持活动的轨迹集群。基线特征与依从性轨迹群的相关性采用多项式逻辑回归进行评估。使用根据基线特征调整的广义估计方程探讨了各坚持轨迹集群中各 PROM(疼痛、功能和一般健康)从基线到随访 1 年(每 3 个月测量一次)的轨迹。结果:确定了四个依从性轨迹群:"高依从性"(68.0%)、"高依从性下降"(16.6%)、"中度依从性增加"(8.5%)和 "中度依从性下降"(6.9%)。多项式逻辑回归结果表明,与其他组群相比,女性性别、年龄较大、体重指数较低、教育程度较低、居住在大都市以外、体育锻炼水平较高、焦虑/抑郁程度较低、不害怕运动、行走困难以及更愿意做运动与被归入 "高度持续 "组群的概率较高有关。信念/观念和社会人口因素占了坚持运动轨迹分组中大部分可解释的差异。虽然 "高坚持率 "群组报告的结果普遍优于其他群组,但这些差异很小。结论:虽然数字化治疗的依从性存在差异,但无论依从性轨迹群组如何,参与者都报告了临床上可比的PROM。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-12.doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12864。
{"title":"Two-Thirds Maintain High Adherence to Digital Education and Exercise Therapy With Comparable Outcomes Across Adherence Clusters: A Registry Study Including Data From Over 14 000 Patients in Sweden","authors":"Ali Kiadaliri, L Stefan Lohmander, Leif E Dahlberg","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12864","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12864","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To explore trajectories of 12-week adherence to a digital education and exercise therapy for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA), associations with baseline characteristics, and trajectories of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) up to 1-year follow-up. <b>DESIGN:</b> Retrospective cohort (registry) study. <b>METHODS:</b> Weekly data on adherence (ie, the percentage of completed activities [exercises, lessons, and quizzes]) were obtained over 12 weeks (n = 14 097). Longitudinal k-means clustering was used to identify adherence trajectory clusters. Associations of baseline characteristics with adherence trajectory clusters were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Trajectories of each PROM (pain, function, and general health) from baseline up to 1-year follow-up (measured at 3-month intervals) across adherence trajectory clusters were explored using generalized estimating equations adjusted for baseline characteristics. <b>RESULTS:</b> Four adherence trajectory clusters were identified: \"high-persistent\" (68.0%), \"high-declining\" (16.6%), \"moderate-increasing\" (8.5%), and \"moderate-declining\" (6.9%). Multinomial logistic regression suggested that female sex, older age, lower body mass index, lower education, living outside metropolitan cities, higher level of physical activity, less anxiety/depression, no fear of movement, having walking difficulties, and higher readiness to do exercise were associated with a higher probability of assignment to \"high-persistent\" than other clusters. Beliefs/perceptions and sociodemographic factors accounted for most of the explained variation in adherence trajectory clusters. While \"high-persistent\" cluster generally reported better outcomes than other clusters, these differences were small. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> While there were variations in adherence to the digital treatment, participants reported clinically comparable PROMs regardless of their adherence trajectory cluster. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-12. Epub 22 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12864</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"56-67"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142840140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nonpharmacological Spine Pain Management in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools 临床实践指南中的非药物脊柱疼痛管理:使用AGREE II和AGREE- rex工具的系统综述。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12729
Ting Ho Lim, Hui Yeung Mak, See Moriah Man Ngai, Yeuk Tsin Man, Ching Ho Tang, Arnold Y L Wong, André Bussières, Fadi M Al Zoubi

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the content and critically appraise the quality and applicability of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of CPGs. LITERATURE SEARCH: Six databases and seven guideline clearinghouses. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Included de novo CPGs for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain designed for any primary health care providers, published in English, Arabic, French, or traditional Chinese within the past 12 years. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five reviewers independently appraised the guidelines using AGREE II and AGREE-REX. Interrater agreements were calculated for each domain and the total score of these tools using the intraclass correlation coefficient (2, 1) with absolute agreement. RESULTS: We included 30 CPGs, primarily (90%) developed in Western countries, which contained 404 recommendations. High-quality CPGs consistently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care, encompassing a combination of exercises, mobilization/manipulation, education, alternative medicine, and cognitive-behavioral treatments. Generally, CPGs did not recommend assistive (eg, corsets and orthosis) devices or electro/thermotherapies (eg, therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation). Approximately half of the CPGs demonstrated good methodological quality according to AGREE II, whereas the rest were of poor quality. On the AGREE-REX assessment, one third of the recommendations were of excellent quality. CONCLUSION: Although recent guidelines frequently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care for the management of spine pain, their recommendations often overlooked demographics and comorbidities. Despite methodological improvements, most CPGs lacked simple clinical applicability and considerations of knowledge users' values. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-14. Epub 4 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12729.

目的:总结近期脊柱疼痛非药物、非手术治疗临床实践指南 (CPG) 的内容,并对其质量和适用性进行严格评估。设计:对 CPG 进行系统回顾。文献检索:六个数据库和七个指南交换中心。研究筛选标准:纳入过去 12 年内以英语、阿拉伯语、法语或繁体中文出版的、针对任何初级医疗保健提供者的非药物、非手术治疗脊柱疼痛的全新 CPG。数据合成:五位评审员使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 对指南进行独立评审。使用类内相关系数 (2, 1) 计算这些工具的每个领域和总分,并计算绝对一致度。结果:我们纳入了 30 项 CPG,主要(90%)由西方国家制定,其中包含 404 项建议。高质量的 CPG 一致推荐运动疗法和多模式护理,包括运动、活动/手法、教育、替代疗法和认知行为疗法的组合。一般来说,CPG 不推荐辅助性(如紧身衣和矫形器)设备或电疗/热疗(如治疗性超声波和经皮神经电刺激)。根据 AGREE II 评估,约有一半的 CPGs 方法质量良好,而其余的质量较差。在 AGREE-REX 评估中,三分之一的建议质量优异。结论:尽管近期的指南经常推荐运动疗法和多模式护理来治疗脊柱疼痛,但其建议往往忽略了人口统计学和合并症。尽管在方法上有所改进,但大多数 CPGs 缺乏简单的临床适用性和对知识使用者价值观的考虑。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-14.doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12729。
{"title":"Nonpharmacological Spine Pain Management in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools","authors":"Ting Ho Lim, Hui Yeung Mak, See Moriah Man Ngai, Yeuk Tsin Man, Ching Ho Tang, Arnold Y L Wong, André Bussières, Fadi M Al Zoubi","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12729","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12729","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To summarize the content and critically appraise the quality and applicability of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain. <b>DESIGN:</b> Systematic review of CPGs. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> Six databases and seven guideline clearinghouses. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Included de novo CPGs for nonpharmacological, nonsurgical management of spine pain designed for any primary health care providers, published in English, Arabic, French, or traditional Chinese within the past 12 years. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Five reviewers independently appraised the guidelines using AGREE II and AGREE-REX. Interrater agreements were calculated for each domain and the total score of these tools using the intraclass correlation coefficient (2, 1) with absolute agreement. <b>RESULTS:</b> We included 30 CPGs, primarily (90%) developed in Western countries, which contained 404 recommendations. High-quality CPGs consistently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care, encompassing a combination of exercises, mobilization/manipulation, education, alternative medicine, and cognitive-behavioral treatments. Generally, CPGs did not recommend assistive (eg, corsets and orthosis) devices or electro/thermotherapies (eg, therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation). Approximately half of the CPGs demonstrated good methodological quality according to AGREE II, whereas the rest were of poor quality. On the AGREE-REX assessment, one third of the recommendations were of excellent quality. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Although recent guidelines frequently recommended exercise therapy and multimodal care for the management of spine pain, their recommendations often overlooked demographics and comorbidities. Despite methodological improvements, most CPGs lacked simple clinical applicability and considerations of knowledge users' values. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-14. Epub 4 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12729</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"12-25"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142840136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RE: Reinterpreting the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Plantar Heel Pain Through an International Lens. RE:通过国际视角重新解读足底跟痛的临床实践指南。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.0202-R
Thomas A Koc, Christopher G Bise, Christopher Neville, Dominic Carreira, RobRoy L Martin

Author response to the JOSPT Letter to the Editor-in-Chief "Reinterpreting the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Plantar Heel Pain Through an International Lens" J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):73-74. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0202-R.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025; 55(1):73-74. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0202-R.
{"title":"RE: Reinterpreting the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Plantar Heel Pain Through an International Lens.","authors":"Thomas A Koc, Christopher G Bise, Christopher Neville, Dominic Carreira, RobRoy L Martin","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0202-R","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.0202-R","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Author response to the <i>JOSPT</i> Letter to the Editor-in-Chief \"Reinterpreting the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Plantar Heel Pain Through an International Lens\" <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):73-74. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0202-R</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"73-74"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Will Deliver the Best Bang-For-Your-Treatment-Buck? Treatment Effects of Physical Therapy Approaches to Managing Chronic Ankle Instability: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 怎样才能为你的治疗带来最好的回报?治疗慢性踝关节不稳的物理治疗方法的效果:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12601
Yi-Shiuan Yang, Pei-Chun Lai, Zhao-Wei Liu, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chia-Hao Chang, Ming-Tung Huang, Po-Ting Wu, Wei-Ren Su, Chih-Kai Hong, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chih-Wei Chang, Chii-Jeng Lin, Chien-An Shih

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy of various physical therapy interventions for chronic ankle instability (CAI). DESIGN: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials examining nonsurgical treatments for CAI. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used frequentist network meta-analysis to assess 8 outcomes across 44 trials, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale or Sport scale, Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in 3 directions (anterior [A], posteromedial [PM], and posterolateral [PL]), dorsiflexion range of motion, and pain. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values identified the most effective interventions. RESULTS: Based on SUCRA rankings, a regimen combining balance and strengthening exercises, augmented with either manual therapy or dry needling, was identified as the most effective in enhancing function (SUCRA: FAAM ADL = 95.2% [manual]/83.9% [dry needling]; FAAM Sport = 87.9% [manual]/80.1% [dry needling]), improving dynamic balance (SUCRA [manual]: SEBT-A = 92.1%; SEBT-PM = 98.0%; SEBT-PL = 90.8%), and significantly relieving pain (SUCRA: 99.9%). A multimodal exercise approach combined with manual therapy showed superior efficacy in increasing dorsiflexion (SUCRA: 61.6%). Tai chi emerged as the most promising intervention for improving stability (SUCRA: 99.9%). CONCLUSION: Interventions that emphasized strengthening and balance exercises were the most effective strategy for achieving best function and pain relief for patients with CAI. Multimodal exercises and tai chi might improve ankle range of motion and instability, respectively. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):26-44. Epub 20 December 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12601.

目的:评价各种物理疗法干预治疗慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)的相对疗效。设计:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。文献检索:PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus和CINAHL书目数据库检索至2023年12月。研究选择标准:随机对照试验检查非手术治疗CAI。数据综合:我们使用频率网络meta分析评估了44项试验的8个结果,包括足踝能力测量(FAAM)、日常生活活动(ADL)量表或运动量表、坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)、3个方向(前[A]、后内侧[PM]和后外侧[PL])的星偏移平衡测试(SEBT)、背屈运动范围和疼痛。累积排序曲线(SUCRA)下的曲面值确定了最有效的干预措施。结果:根据SUCRA排名,结合平衡和强化运动,辅以手动治疗或干针治疗的方案被认为是增强功能最有效的方案(SUCRA: FAAM ADL = 95.2%[手动]/83.9%[干针];FAAM Sport = 87.9%[手动]/80.1%[干针]),改善动平衡(SUCRA[手动]:SEBT-A = 92.1%;Sebt-pm = 98.0%;SEBT-PL = 90.8%),显著缓解疼痛(SUCRA: 99.9%)。多模态运动方法结合手工疗法在增加背屈方面表现出优越的疗效(supra: 61.6%)。太极被认为是最有希望改善稳定性的干预措施(supra: 99.9%)。结论:强调强化和平衡运动的干预措施是实现CAI患者最佳功能和疼痛缓解的最有效策略。多模式运动和太极可能分别改善踝关节的活动范围和不稳定性。[J] .体育运动学报,2015;55(1):26-44。2024年12月20日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2024.12601。
{"title":"What Will Deliver the Best Bang-For-Your-Treatment-Buck? Treatment Effects of Physical Therapy Approaches to Managing Chronic Ankle Instability: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Yi-Shiuan Yang, Pei-Chun Lai, Zhao-Wei Liu, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chia-Hao Chang, Ming-Tung Huang, Po-Ting Wu, Wei-Ren Su, Chih-Kai Hong, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chih-Wei Chang, Chii-Jeng Lin, Chien-An Shih","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To evaluate the relative efficacy of various physical therapy interventions for chronic ankle instability (CAI). <b>DESIGN:</b> A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL bibliographic databases were searched up to December 2023. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Randomized controlled trials examining nonsurgical treatments for CAI. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> We used frequentist network meta-analysis to assess 8 outcomes across 44 trials, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale or Sport scale, Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in 3 directions (anterior [A], posteromedial [PM], and posterolateral [PL]), dorsiflexion range of motion, and pain. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values identified the most effective interventions. <b>RESULTS</b>: Based on SUCRA rankings, a regimen combining balance and strengthening exercises, augmented with either manual therapy or dry needling, was identified as the most effective in enhancing function (SUCRA: FAAM ADL = 95.2% [manual]/83.9% [dry needling]; FAAM Sport = 87.9% [manual]/80.1% [dry needling]), improving dynamic balance (SUCRA [manual]: SEBT-A = 92.1%; SEBT-PM = 98.0%; SEBT-PL = 90.8%), and significantly relieving pain (SUCRA: 99.9%). A multimodal exercise approach combined with manual therapy showed superior efficacy in increasing dorsiflexion (SUCRA: 61.6%). Tai chi emerged as the most promising intervention for improving stability (SUCRA: 99.9%). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Interventions that emphasized strengthening and balance exercises were the most effective strategy for achieving best function and pain relief for patients with CAI. Multimodal exercises and tai chi might improve ankle range of motion and instability, respectively. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):26-44. Epub 20 December 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12601</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"26-44"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing Consensus for an Upper and Lower Limb Athlete Pain Assessment Framework - A Real-Time Delphi Study With International Sports Physiotherapists 发展共识的上肢和下肢运动员疼痛评估框架-实时德尔福研究与国际运动物理治疗师。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12807
Ciarán Purcell, Brona M Fullen, Tomás Ward, Brian M Caulfield

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop recommendations to inform a framework for comprehensively assessing upper and lower limb pain in athletes including the key assessment items sports physiotherapists should consider. DESIGN: Real-time Delphi. METHODS: We recruited sports physiotherapists who were currently working with athletes through the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapists and Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists. Participants voted on 86 pain assessment items chosen using best available evidence. The real-time Delphi method facilitated independent anonymous voting, commenting, and immediate review of consensus. Participants indicated level of agreement for inclusion in an upper and lower limb athlete pain assessment framework on a 6-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and how often they are/will be required in practice on a 5-point scale from never to always. Criteria for consensus agreement and inclusion were (1) >70% sports physiotherapists voting agree/strongly agree AND (2) median vote selected by physiotherapists was agree or strongly agree. RESULTS: Forty-one sports physiotherapists (female, n = 20; male, n = 21), visited the survey an average of 5.3 times (±5), resulting in a completion rate of 98%. Sixty-four assessment items (neurophysiological, n = 20; biomechanical, n = 15; affective, n = 8; cognitive, n = 3; socioenvironmental, n = 10; general assessment aspects of assessment, n = 8) met the criteria for consensus. Frequency of use in practice was always for 28 items often for 32 items and sometimes for 4 items. CONCLUSION: We have presented stakeholder-generated recommendations and priorities for assessing athletes' pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-11. Epub 22 November 2024. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12807.

目的:我们试图为全面评估运动员上肢和下肢疼痛的框架提供建议,包括运动理疗师应考虑的关键评估项目。设计:实时德尔菲法。方法:我们通过国际运动理疗师联合会和爱尔兰特许理疗师协会招募了目前为运动员提供服务的运动理疗师。参与者对利用现有最佳证据选出的 86 个疼痛评估项目进行投票。实时德尔菲法为独立匿名投票、评论和即时审查共识提供了便利。参与者以从非常不同意到非常同意的 6 级李克特量表来表示是否同意将这些项目纳入上肢和下肢运动员疼痛评估框架,并以从从不到总是的 5 级量表来表示在实践中需要/将需要这些项目的频率。达成共识和纳入的标准是:(1)超过 70% 的运动理疗师投票同意/非常同意;(2)理疗师选择的投票中位数为同意或非常同意。结果:41 名运动理疗师(女性,n = 20;男性,n = 21)平均访问调查表 5.3 次(±5),完成率为 98%。64个评估项目(神经生理学,n = 20;生物力学,n = 15;情感,n = 8;认知,n = 3;社会环境,n = 10;一般评估方面的评估,n = 8)符合共识标准。在实践中经常使用的有 28 项,经常使用的有 32 项,有时使用的有 4 项。结论:我们介绍了由利益相关者提出的评估运动员疼痛的建议和优先事项。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-11.https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12807.
{"title":"Developing Consensus for an Upper and Lower Limb Athlete Pain Assessment Framework - A Real-Time Delphi Study With International Sports Physiotherapists","authors":"Ciarán Purcell, Brona M Fullen, Tomás Ward, Brian M Caulfield","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12807","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> We sought to develop recommendations to inform a framework for comprehensively assessing upper and lower limb pain in athletes including the key assessment items sports physiotherapists should consider. <b>DESIGN:</b> Real-time Delphi. <b>METHODS:</b> We recruited sports physiotherapists who were currently working with athletes through the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapists and Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists. Participants voted on 86 pain assessment items chosen using best available evidence. The real-time Delphi method facilitated independent anonymous voting, commenting, and immediate review of consensus. Participants indicated level of agreement for inclusion in an upper and lower limb athlete pain assessment framework on a 6-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and how often they are/will be required in practice on a 5-point scale from never to always. Criteria for consensus agreement and inclusion were (1) >70% sports physiotherapists voting agree/strongly agree AND (2) median vote selected by physiotherapists was agree or strongly agree. <b>RESULTS:</b> Forty-one sports physiotherapists (female, n = 20; male, n = 21), visited the survey an average of 5.3 times (±5), resulting in a completion rate of 98%. Sixty-four assessment items (neurophysiological, n = 20; biomechanical, n = 15; affective, n = 8; cognitive, n = 3; socioenvironmental, n = 10; general assessment aspects of assessment, n = 8) met the criteria for consensus. Frequency of use in practice was always for 28 items often for 32 items and sometimes for 4 items. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> We have presented stakeholder-generated recommendations and priorities for assessing athletes' pain. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-11. Epub 22 November 2024. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12807</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142840118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physical Function Following Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: A Longitudinal Systematic Review With Meta-analysis 骨关节炎全膝关节置换术后的身体功能:一项纵向系统评价和荟萃分析。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12570
Gemma M Orange, Dana A Hince, Mervyn J Travers, Tasha R Stanton, Matthew Jones, Saurab Sharma, Sumin Kim, Benedict M Wand, Myles C Murphy

OBJECTIVES: To explore the extent of functional improvement following primary total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis and to compare the trajectories of self-reported and performance-based measures of physical function. DESIGN: Longitudinal systematic review with meta-analysis METHODS: We searched 3 electronic databases from January 2005 to February 2023 for longitudinal cohort studies involving adults with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Estimates of self-reported and performance-based physical function were extracted presurgery and up to 5 years postsurgery. Risk of bias was assessed using a 6-item checklist. Self-reported function scores were converted to a 0-100 scale (higher scores indicate worse function). Mixed models provided pooled estimates after excluding low-quality studies. RESULTS: Out of 230 relevant studies, 72 (n = 19 063) of high quality were included in meta-analyses. Self-reported function significantly improved from presurgery (55.6/100; 95% confidence interval [CI], 53.1 to 58.1) to 3-6 months postsurgery (21.1; 95% CI, 17.9 to 24.3; P<.001). A small decline in self-reported function occurred at 6-12 months (31.0; 95% CI, 25.8 to 36.2; P<.001), with no further change at 12-24 months (30.9; 95% CI, 23.2 to 38.6; P = .919). Performance-based measures exhibited variable trajectories, with most estimates indicating no clinically meaningful improvement following total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Total knee arthroplasty resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in self-reported function at 3-6 months postoperatively. There was some deterioration in function after 6 months, and at no other time point did the estimate reach a clinically important change. There was limited evidence of clinically meaningful improvements in performance-based measures of physical function at any time point. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-11. Epub 26 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12570.

目的:探讨膝关节骨关节炎原发性全膝关节置换术后功能改善的程度,并比较自我报告和基于表现的身体功能测量的轨迹。方法:从2005年1月至2023年2月,我们检索了3个电子数据库,纳入成人膝关节骨关节炎患者行原发性全膝关节置换术的纵向队列研究。在手术前和术后5年提取自我报告和基于表现的身体功能估计。偏倚风险采用6项检查表进行评估。自我报告的功能评分转换为0-100分(分数越高表明功能越差)。混合模型在排除低质量研究后提供了汇总估计。结果:在230项相关研究中,72项(n = 19063)高质量研究被纳入meta分析。手术后自我报告功能显著改善(55.6/100;95%可信区间[CI], 53.1 ~ 58.1)至术后3-6个月(21.1;95% CI, 17.9 ~ 24.3;PPP = 0.919)。基于性能的测量显示出可变的轨迹,大多数估计表明全膝关节置换术后没有临床意义的改善。结论:全膝关节置换术对术后3-6个月患者自我报告的功能有临床意义的改善。6个月后,患者的功能出现了一些恶化,在其他时间点没有出现重要的临床变化。在任何时间点,基于表现的身体功能测量的临床有意义的改善证据有限。[J] .体育学报,2015;33(1):1-11。2024年11月26日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2024.12570。
{"title":"Physical Function Following Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: A Longitudinal Systematic Review With Meta-analysis","authors":"Gemma M Orange, Dana A Hince, Mervyn J Travers, Tasha R Stanton, Matthew Jones, Saurab Sharma, Sumin Kim, Benedict M Wand, Myles C Murphy","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12570","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12570","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To explore the extent of functional improvement following primary total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis and to compare the trajectories of self-reported and performance-based measures of physical function. <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal systematic review with meta-analysis <b>METHODS:</b> We searched 3 electronic databases from January 2005 to February 2023 for longitudinal cohort studies involving adults with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Estimates of self-reported and performance-based physical function were extracted presurgery and up to 5 years postsurgery. Risk of bias was assessed using a 6-item checklist. Self-reported function scores were converted to a 0-100 scale (higher scores indicate worse function). Mixed models provided pooled estimates after excluding low-quality studies. <b>RESULTS:</b> Out of 230 relevant studies, 72 (n = 19 063) of high quality were included in meta-analyses. Self-reported function significantly improved from presurgery (55.6/100; 95% confidence interval [CI], 53.1 to 58.1) to 3-6 months postsurgery (21.1; 95% CI, 17.9 to 24.3; <i>P</i><.001). A small decline in self-reported function occurred at 6-12 months (31.0; 95% CI, 25.8 to 36.2; <i>P</i><.001), with no further change at 12-24 months (30.9; 95% CI, 23.2 to 38.6; <i>P</i> = .919). Performance-based measures exhibited variable trajectories, with most estimates indicating no clinically meaningful improvement following total knee arthroplasty. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Total knee arthroplasty resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in self-reported function at 3-6 months postoperatively. There was some deterioration in function after 6 months, and at no other time point did the estimate reach a clinically important change. There was limited evidence of clinically meaningful improvements in performance-based measures of physical function at any time point. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-11. Epub 26 November 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12570</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Achilles Pain, Stiffness, and Muscle Power Deficits: Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy Revision - 2024. 跟腱疼痛,僵硬和肌肉力量不足:跟腱中段病变修正- 2024。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.0501

Midportion tendinopathy is a common overuse lower extremity injury, with a prevalence of 4% to 7%. Achilles tendinopathy especially affects people who participate in activities that load the Achilles tendon, such as running. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire has been the go-to patient-reported outcome measure of the perceived impact of Achilles tendinopathy. Recently, new instruments have been developed to try and overcome concerns about the validity of the VISA-A. The revised CPG summarized current evidence, and updated recommendations to support evidence-based practice, including tailored clinical decision-making, about managing Achilles tendinopathy. The CPG excluded interventions that were outside the typical scope of physical therapy practice (eg, pharmacological interventions and surgery) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):68-69. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0501.

中段肌腱病变是一种常见的下肢过度使用损伤,患病率为4% ~ 7%。跟腱病尤其影响那些参加对跟腱有负荷的活动的人,比如跑步。维多利亚运动评估-跟腱(VISA-A)调查问卷一直是患者报告跟腱病变感知影响的结果测量方法。最近,已经开发了新的工具,试图克服对VISA-A有效性的担忧。修订后的CPG总结了当前的证据,并更新了支持循证实践的建议,包括针对跟腱病管理的量身定制的临床决策。CPG排除了典型物理治疗实践范围之外的干预措施(例如,药物干预和手术)和体外冲击波治疗。[J] .中华体育杂志,2015;55(1):68-69。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.0501。
{"title":"Achilles Pain, Stiffness, and Muscle Power Deficits: Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy Revision - 2024.","authors":"","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0501","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2025.0501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Midportion tendinopathy is a common overuse lower extremity injury, with a prevalence of 4% to 7%. Achilles tendinopathy especially affects people who participate in activities that load the Achilles tendon, such as running. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire has been the go-to patient-reported outcome measure of the perceived impact of Achilles tendinopathy. Recently, new instruments have been developed to try and overcome concerns about the validity of the VISA-A. The revised CPG summarized current evidence, and updated recommendations to support evidence-based practice, including tailored clinical decision-making, about managing Achilles tendinopathy. The CPG excluded interventions that were outside the typical scope of physical therapy practice (eg, pharmacological interventions and surgery) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):68-69. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.0501</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"68-69"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142916140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1