A clinical investigation to assess the regenerative potential of Biostite® (hydroxyapatite, type-I collagen and chondroitin-sulphate) with or without Paroguide® type-I collagen and chondroitin sulphate) membrane in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects appraised with surgical re-entry and computer-assisted densitometric image analysis.

Srinivasa Tenkasale Siddeshappa, Gayathri Gunjiganur Vemanaradhya, Nagur Karibasappa Sowmya
{"title":"A clinical investigation to assess the regenerative potential of Biostite<sup>®</sup> (hydroxyapatite, type-I collagen and chondroitin-sulphate) with or without Paroguide<sup>®</sup> type-I collagen and chondroitin sulphate) membrane in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects appraised with surgical re-entry and computer-assisted densitometric image analysis.","authors":"Srinivasa Tenkasale Siddeshappa, Gayathri Gunjiganur Vemanaradhya, Nagur Karibasappa Sowmya","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_450_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional treatment procedures which aimed at treating periodontal disease did not result in true periodontal regeneration. Unpredictability about osseous defect fill after periodontal flap surgery has stemmed in the research of a variety of regenerative materials. This randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare regenerative potential of Biostite<sup>®</sup> bone graft material with and without Paroguide<sup>®</sup> a bioresorbable membrane in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty sites from a total of from ten patients were chosen for the study. Those sites were divided into experimental site A (Biostite<sup>®</sup>) and experimental site B (Biostite<sup>®</sup> with Paroguide<sup>®</sup>) at random. Plaque index and gingival index (GI) were the clinical parameters noted at baseline, 3<sup>rd</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup> months, whereas the probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and gingival recession were noted at baseline, 6<sup>th</sup> and 9<sup>th</sup> months. Radiographic evaluation was made by using computer-assisted densitometric analysis. Intrasurgical measurements were done at baseline and 9 months. Statistical analysis was done using paired <i>t</i>-test and un-paired <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both experimental site A and B showed a significant reduction in plaque and GI. All clinical parameters as well as radiographic image analysis showed highly significant improvement from baseline to 9 months for both sites. Inter-group comparison does not show statistically significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggested that both Biostite<sup>®</sup> bone graft and Paroguide<sup>®</sup> membrane have promised encouraging results in the management of periodontal intrabony defects, however, the groups did differed to each other statistically.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":"27 5","pages":"496-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_450_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The traditional treatment procedures which aimed at treating periodontal disease did not result in true periodontal regeneration. Unpredictability about osseous defect fill after periodontal flap surgery has stemmed in the research of a variety of regenerative materials. This randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare regenerative potential of Biostite® bone graft material with and without Paroguide® a bioresorbable membrane in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects.

Materials and methods: Twenty sites from a total of from ten patients were chosen for the study. Those sites were divided into experimental site A (Biostite®) and experimental site B (Biostite® with Paroguide®) at random. Plaque index and gingival index (GI) were the clinical parameters noted at baseline, 3rd, 6th and 9th months, whereas the probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and gingival recession were noted at baseline, 6th and 9th months. Radiographic evaluation was made by using computer-assisted densitometric analysis. Intrasurgical measurements were done at baseline and 9 months. Statistical analysis was done using paired t-test and un-paired t-test.

Results: Both experimental site A and B showed a significant reduction in plaque and GI. All clinical parameters as well as radiographic image analysis showed highly significant improvement from baseline to 9 months for both sites. Inter-group comparison does not show statistically significant improvement.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that both Biostite® bone graft and Paroguide® membrane have promised encouraging results in the management of periodontal intrabony defects, however, the groups did differed to each other statistically.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估Biosite®(羟基磷灰石、I型胶原和硫酸软骨素)在治疗牙周骨内缺陷方面的再生潜力的临床研究,通过手术复位和计算机辅助密度计图像分析进行评估。
背景:旨在治疗牙周病的传统治疗程序并没有导致真正的牙周再生。牙周皮瓣术后骨缺损填充的不可预测性源于对各种再生材料的研究。进行这项随机临床试验是为了比较Biosite®骨移植材料与Paroguide®(一种生物可吸收膜)在治疗牙周骨缺损方面的再生潜力。材料和方法:从10名患者中选择20个部位进行研究。这些位点被随机分为实验位点A(Biostite®)和实验位点B(Biostie®与Paroguide®)。牙菌斑指数和牙龈指数(GI)是在基线、第3、第6和第9个月记录的临床参数,而探测袋深度、临床附着水平和牙龈退缩则在基线、第一、第六和第九个月记录。使用计算机辅助密度计分析进行射线照相评估。术中测量在基线和9个月时进行。使用配对t检验和非配对t检验进行统计分析。结果:实验部位A和B均显示斑块和GI显著减少。所有临床参数和放射学图像分析均显示,从基线到9个月,两个部位的斑块和GI均有非常显著的改善。组间比较没有显示出统计学上的显著改善。结论:这项研究的结果表明,Biosite®骨移植物和Paroguide®膜在牙周骨内缺陷的治疗方面都取得了令人鼓舞的结果,然而,这两组在统计学上确实存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
期刊最新文献
Applications of a minimally invasive roll flap technique in peri-implant soft-tissue augmentation - A case series. Impact of periodontal phenotype on the outcome of subgingival instrumentation in Stage II and III, Grade A and B periodontitis. Indian Society of Periodontology Scientific Events. Is the oral hygiene complete without the tongue cleaning? Longterm success of implants: Supportive peri-implant care is the "MANTRA"??
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1