Determination of the Trans-Lamina Cribrosa Pressure Difference in a Community-Based Population and its Association with Open-Angle Glaucoma

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.09.002
Prashant D. Tailor MD , Bryce J. Aul MD , Arthur J. Sit MD , Michael P. Fautsch PhD , John J. Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Determination of the Trans-Lamina Cribrosa Pressure Difference in a Community-Based Population and its Association with Open-Angle Glaucoma","authors":"Prashant D. Tailor MD ,&nbsp;Bryce J. Aul MD ,&nbsp;Arthur J. Sit MD ,&nbsp;Michael P. Fautsch PhD ,&nbsp;John J. Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) in a cohort of normal community-based patients and the relationship to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging is a prospective study evaluating the normal aging population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Mayo Clinic Study of Aging patients who underwent routine lumbar puncture (LP) studies with eye examinations were reviewed. The trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference was calculated in 2 contexts of </span>intraocular pressure<span> (IOP): (1) maximum IOP at eye visit closest in time to the LP (closest-in-time TLCPD); and (2) IOP before IOP-lowering treatment (pretreatment IOP and pretreatment TLCPD) in POAG and NTG patients. Glaucoma patients without POAG or NTG were excluded. Regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship with glaucoma.</span></p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>IOP, intracranial pressure, TLCPD, POAG, normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnosis, glaucoma parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Five hundred forty-eight patients were analyzed. Of these, there were 38 treated glaucoma patients (14 POAG and 24 NTG) and 510 nonglaucomatous patients. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure was 155.0 ± 42.2 mmH</span><sub>2</sub>O in nonglaucomatous patients, 144.0 ± 34.0 mmH<sub>2</sub>O in POAG (<em>P</em> = 0.15 vs. nonglaucomatous patients), and 136.6 ± 29.3 mmH<sub>2</sub>O in NTG (<em>P</em> = 0.017 vs. nonglaucomatous patients). Intraocular pressure was 15.47 ± 2.9 mmHg in nonglaucomatous patients, 26.6 ± 3.7 mmHg in POAG, and 17.4 ± 3.4 mmHg in NTG. The closest-in-time TLCPD in the nonglaucomatous cohort was 4.07 ± 4.22 mmHg, which was lower than both the POAG cohort (7.19 ± 3.6 mmHg) and the NTG cohort (5.79 ± 4.5 mmHg, <em>P</em> = 0.04). Pretreatment TLCPD for the overall glaucoma cohort was 10.57 ± 6.1 mmHg. The POAG cohort had a higher pretreatment TLCPD (16.05 ± 5.2 mmHg) than the NTG cohort (7.37 ± 4.1 mmHg; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Closest-in-time TLCPD for the nonglaucoma cohort (4.07± 4.2 mmHg) was significantly lower than pretreatment TLCPDs for both POAG (16.05 ± 5.2 mmHg; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and NTG (7.37 ± 4.1 mmHg; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study establishes the baseline TLCPD in a large cohort of normal, community-based patients. The differences in regression analysis between TLCPD and IOP suggests NTG pathophysiology is partially driven by TLCPD, but is also likely multifactorial.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 168-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) in a cohort of normal community-based patients and the relationship to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

Design

Retrospective cohort study of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

Participants

The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging is a prospective study evaluating the normal aging population.

Methods

Mayo Clinic Study of Aging patients who underwent routine lumbar puncture (LP) studies with eye examinations were reviewed. The trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference was calculated in 2 contexts of intraocular pressure (IOP): (1) maximum IOP at eye visit closest in time to the LP (closest-in-time TLCPD); and (2) IOP before IOP-lowering treatment (pretreatment IOP and pretreatment TLCPD) in POAG and NTG patients. Glaucoma patients without POAG or NTG were excluded. Regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship with glaucoma.

Main Outcome Measures

IOP, intracranial pressure, TLCPD, POAG, normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnosis, glaucoma parameters.

Results

Five hundred forty-eight patients were analyzed. Of these, there were 38 treated glaucoma patients (14 POAG and 24 NTG) and 510 nonglaucomatous patients. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure was 155.0 ± 42.2 mmH2O in nonglaucomatous patients, 144.0 ± 34.0 mmH2O in POAG (P = 0.15 vs. nonglaucomatous patients), and 136.6 ± 29.3 mmH2O in NTG (P = 0.017 vs. nonglaucomatous patients). Intraocular pressure was 15.47 ± 2.9 mmHg in nonglaucomatous patients, 26.6 ± 3.7 mmHg in POAG, and 17.4 ± 3.4 mmHg in NTG. The closest-in-time TLCPD in the nonglaucomatous cohort was 4.07 ± 4.22 mmHg, which was lower than both the POAG cohort (7.19 ± 3.6 mmHg) and the NTG cohort (5.79 ± 4.5 mmHg, P = 0.04). Pretreatment TLCPD for the overall glaucoma cohort was 10.57 ± 6.1 mmHg. The POAG cohort had a higher pretreatment TLCPD (16.05 ± 5.2 mmHg) than the NTG cohort (7.37 ± 4.1 mmHg; P < 0.0001). Closest-in-time TLCPD for the nonglaucoma cohort (4.07± 4.2 mmHg) was significantly lower than pretreatment TLCPDs for both POAG (16.05 ± 5.2 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and NTG (7.37 ± 4.1 mmHg; P < 0.0001) cohorts.

Conclusions

This study establishes the baseline TLCPD in a large cohort of normal, community-based patients. The differences in regression analysis between TLCPD and IOP suggests NTG pathophysiology is partially driven by TLCPD, but is also likely multifactorial.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区人群中跨筛层压差的测定及其与开角型青光眼的关系。
目的:确定一组正常社区患者的跨筛层压差(TLCPD),以及与原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和正常眼压型青光眼(NTG)的关系设计:梅奥老龄化临床研究(MCSA)的回顾性队列研究参与者:MCSA是一项评估正常老龄化人群的前瞻性研究。方法:对MCSA患者进行常规腰椎穿刺检查和眼部检查。TLCPD是在两种眼压(IOP)的情况下计算的:1)最接近LP的访视时的最大IOP(最接近时间的TLCPD)和2)POAG和NTG患者在IOP较低治疗前的IOP(治疗前IOP)(治疗前TLCPD)。没有POAG或NTG的青光眼患者被排除在外。进行回归分析以确定与青光眼的关系。主要转归指标:眼压、颅内压(ICP)、TLCPD、POAG、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)诊断、青光眼参数。结果:对548例患者进行分析。其中,有38名接受治疗的青光眼患者(14名POAG和24名NTG)和510名非青光眼患者。非青光眼患者的脑脊液开放压为155.0±42.2 mmH2O,POAG患者的脑脊液打开压为144.0±34.0 mmH2O(与非青光眼患者相比p=0.15),NTG患者的脑脊液开启压为136.6±29.3 mmH2O(相对于非青光眼患者而言p=0.017)。非青光眼患者的眼压为15.47±2.9毫米汞柱,POAG为26.6±3.7毫米汞柱和NTG为17.4±3.4毫米汞柱。非青光眼队列中最接近的时间TLCPD为4.07±4.22 mmHg,低于POAG队列(7.19±3.6 mmHg)和NTG队列(5.79±4.5 mmHg,p=0.04)。整个青光眼队列的治疗前TLCPD是10.57±6.1 mmHg。POAG队列的治疗前TLCPD(16.05±5.2 mmHg)高于NTG队列(7.37±4.1 mmHg);P结论:本研究在一个大型的正常社区患者队列中建立了基线TLCPD。TLCPD和IOP之间的回归分析差异表明,NTG的病理生理学部分由TLCPD驱动,但也可能是多因素的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Female-Specific Association between the Apolipoprotein E E4 Allele and Age at Diagnosis of Glaucoma in UK Biobank Incidence of Acute Cystoid Macular Edema after Starting a Prostaglandin Analog Compared with Other Classes of Glaucoma Medications Visualizing the Void: 3-Dimensional Insights into Optic Disc Pit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1