State of the Art in Radiostereometric Analysis for Tibial Baseplate Migration and Future Research Directions.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4063626
Abigail E Niesen, Maury L Hull
{"title":"State of the Art in Radiostereometric Analysis for Tibial Baseplate Migration and Future Research Directions.","authors":"Abigail E Niesen, Maury L Hull","doi":"10.1115/1.4063626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measures movement (migration) of a baseplate relative to the underlying tibia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and has been used extensively to evaluate safety of new implant designs and/or surgical techniques regarding baseplate loosening. Because RSA is a complex methodology which involves various choices that researchers make, including whether to use marker-based or model-based methods, which migration metric to report, how to relate short-term migrations to long-term risk, and how these choices impact error, the objectives of this review were to: (1) lay out a comprehensive structure illustrating the multiple components/considerations for RSA and their interrelations, (2) review components of the structure using the latest RSA literature, and (3) use the preceding review as a context for identifying future areas of study. The components to be reviewed were structured using the following topics: type of RSA, migration metrics, sources of error, studies/reports of error, stability limits, and studies of error in stability limits. Based on the current RSA literature and knowledge gaps which exist, the following future research directions were identified: (1) revising the ISO standard to require reporting of clinical measurement error (bias) and recommending use of a local baseplate coordinate system, (2) identifying the migration metric and associated threshold most predictive of baseplate loosening for individual patients, (3) creating a method for data sharing to improve individual patient diagnostics, and (4) determining an appropriate stability limit for model-based RSA for group stability and individual patient diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measures movement (migration) of a baseplate relative to the underlying tibia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and has been used extensively to evaluate safety of new implant designs and/or surgical techniques regarding baseplate loosening. Because RSA is a complex methodology which involves various choices that researchers make, including whether to use marker-based or model-based methods, which migration metric to report, how to relate short-term migrations to long-term risk, and how these choices impact error, the objectives of this review were to: (1) lay out a comprehensive structure illustrating the multiple components/considerations for RSA and their interrelations, (2) review components of the structure using the latest RSA literature, and (3) use the preceding review as a context for identifying future areas of study. The components to be reviewed were structured using the following topics: type of RSA, migration metrics, sources of error, studies/reports of error, stability limits, and studies of error in stability limits. Based on the current RSA literature and knowledge gaps which exist, the following future research directions were identified: (1) revising the ISO standard to require reporting of clinical measurement error (bias) and recommending use of a local baseplate coordinate system, (2) identifying the migration metric and associated threshold most predictive of baseplate loosening for individual patients, (3) creating a method for data sharing to improve individual patient diagnostics, and (4) determining an appropriate stability limit for model-based RSA for group stability and individual patient diagnostics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胫骨底板移位放射立体测量分析的现状和未来的研究方向。
放射立体测量分析(RSA)测量全膝关节置换术(TKA)后基板相对于下方胫骨的运动(迁移),并已被广泛用于评估新植入物设计和/或与基板松动有关的手术技术的安全性。因为RSA是一种复杂的方法,它涉及研究人员做出的各种选择,包括是使用基于标记的方法还是基于模型的方法,报告哪种迁移指标,如何将短期迁移与长期风险联系起来,以及这些选择如何影响错误,本综述的目的是:(1)制定一个全面的结构,说明RSA的多个组成部分/考虑因素及其相互关系;(2)使用最新的RSA文献综述该结构的组成部分;(3)将之前的综述作为确定未来研究领域的背景。要审查的组件使用以下主题构建:RSA类型、迁移度量、错误源、错误研究/报告、稳定性极限和稳定性极限中的错误研究。基于目前RSA文献和存在的知识空白,确定了以下未来的研究方向:(1)修订ISO标准,要求报告临床测量误差(偏差),并建议使用局部底板坐标系;(2)确定最能预测个别患者底板松动的迁移度量和相关阈值,(3)创建用于数据共享的方法以改进个体患者诊断,以及(4)确定用于组稳定性和个体患者诊断的基于模型的RSA的适当稳定性极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
期刊最新文献
Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness. Phenomenological Muscle Constitutive Model With Actin-Titin Binding for Simulating Active Stretching. Regulatory Role of Collagen XI in the Establishment of Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments in Mice Is Tissue Dependent. Study of the Mechanism of Perceived Rotational Acceleration of a Bionic Semicircular Canal on the Basis of the "Circular Geometry Hypothesis". Walking Slope and Heavy Backpacks Affect Peak and Impulsive Lumbar Joint Contact Forces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1