An intervention to decrease sedentary behavior in older adults: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2023-06-15 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.687
Nikita Abraham, Kate Lyden, Robert Boucher, Guo Wei, Victoria Gonce, Judy Carle, Katalin Fornadi, Mark A Supiano, Jesse Christensen, Srinivasan Beddhu
{"title":"An intervention to decrease sedentary behavior in older adults: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Nikita Abraham, Kate Lyden, Robert Boucher, Guo Wei, Victoria Gonce, Judy Carle, Katalin Fornadi, Mark A Supiano, Jesse Christensen, Srinivasan Beddhu","doi":"10.1002/osp4.687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedentary behaviors are associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults. The feasibility of behavioral interventions in this population is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Sit Less, Interact, Move More (SLIMM) trial of 106 participants who had obesity, those randomized to the SLIMM intervention (<i>N</i> = 54) were instructed to replace sedentary activities with stepping. An accelerometer was used to measure physical activity. In this secondary analysis, mixed effect models were used to examine the effects of the SLIMM intervention on sedentary and stepping durations and steps/day by age (<70 and ≥ 70 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ages in the <70 years (<i>N</i> = 47) and ≥70 years (<i>N</i> = 59) groups were 58 ± 11 and 78 ± 5. In the older subgroup, compared to standard-of-care (<i>N</i> = 29), the SLIMM intervention (<i>N</i> = 30) significantly increased stepping duration (13, 95%CI 1-24 min/d, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and steps per day (1330, 95% CI 322-2338, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and non-significantly decreased sedentary duration by (28,95% CI -61-5 min/d, <i>p</i> = 0.09). In the age <70 subgroup, there was no separation between the standard of care (<i>N</i> = 23) and SLIMM (<i>N</i> = 24) groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In older adults who had obesity, SLIMM intervention significantly increased stepping duration and steps per day. Interventions targeting sedentary behaviors by promoting low intensity physical activity may be feasible in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"9 5","pages":"529-537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/f9/OSP4-9-529.PMC10551115.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behaviors are associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults. The feasibility of behavioral interventions in this population is unclear.

Methods: In the Sit Less, Interact, Move More (SLIMM) trial of 106 participants who had obesity, those randomized to the SLIMM intervention (N = 54) were instructed to replace sedentary activities with stepping. An accelerometer was used to measure physical activity. In this secondary analysis, mixed effect models were used to examine the effects of the SLIMM intervention on sedentary and stepping durations and steps/day by age (<70 and ≥ 70 years).

Results: Mean ages in the <70 years (N = 47) and ≥70 years (N = 59) groups were 58 ± 11 and 78 ± 5. In the older subgroup, compared to standard-of-care (N = 29), the SLIMM intervention (N = 30) significantly increased stepping duration (13, 95%CI 1-24 min/d, p = 0.038) and steps per day (1330, 95% CI 322-2338, p = 0.01) and non-significantly decreased sedentary duration by (28,95% CI -61-5 min/d, p = 0.09). In the age <70 subgroup, there was no separation between the standard of care (N = 23) and SLIMM (N = 24) groups.

Discussion: In older adults who had obesity, SLIMM intervention significantly increased stepping duration and steps per day. Interventions targeting sedentary behaviors by promoting low intensity physical activity may be feasible in this population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少老年人久坐行为的干预措施:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
背景:久坐行为与老年人的不良健康后果有关。行为干预在这一人群中的可行性尚不清楚。方法:在对106名肥胖参与者进行的“少坐、多互动、多运动”(SLIMM)试验中,随机接受SLIMM干预的参与者(N=54)被指示用踏步代替久坐活动。加速度计被用来测量身体活动。在这项二次分析中,使用混合效应模型来检验SLIMM干预对久坐和步行持续时间以及按年龄划分的步数/天的影响(结果:N=47)和≥70岁(N=59)组的平均年龄分别为58±11和78±5。在老年亚组中,与标准护理(N=29)相比,SLIMM干预(N=30)显著增加了步进持续时间(13,95%CI 1-24 min/d,p=0.038)和每日步数(1330,95%CI 322-2338,p=0.01),而久坐持续时间(28,95%CI-61-5 min/d,p=0.09)无显著减少。在年龄N=23)和SLIMM(N=24)组中。讨论:在患有肥胖症的老年人中,SLIMM干预显著增加了步行时间和每天的步数。通过促进低强度体育活动来针对久坐行为的干预措施在这一人群中可能是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Weight Stigma in Gynecological Care Among Cisgender Women. Centering Weight Management Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care on Patients With Obesity and Practitioners: A Proof-Of-Concept Study. Practical Awareness-Based Strategies for Eating (PASE): A Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Trial. Weight Stigma and Orthopedic Surgeons' Treatment Preferences for Patients With Obesity Who Are Candidates for Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty. Motivational Interviewing (MI) in Obesity Care: Cultivating Person-Centered and Supportive Clinical Conversations to Reduce Stigma: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1