Work-family and family-work conflicts amongst African nurses caring for patients with AIDS.

Lehlogonolo Makola, Solomon Mashegoane, Legesse K Debusho
{"title":"Work-family and family-work conflicts amongst African nurses caring for patients with AIDS.","authors":"Lehlogonolo Makola,&nbsp;Solomon Mashegoane,&nbsp;Legesse K Debusho","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South African nursing environments are marked by various incapacitating stressors. This study explores work-family (W-F) and family-work (F-W) conflicts as aspects of stress amongst nurses working with patients who have AIDS.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study sought to determine the value of W-F and F-W conflicts as predictors of work and family satisfaction, as well as turnover intentions and the moderating role of supervisor and significant other support, amongst nurses caring for patients with AIDS in public hospitals within the Capricorn and Mopani districts, Limpopo Province.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a cross-sectional design, with data collected at one point only. Ninety-one nursing staff provided the data for the study by completing structured, self-administered surveys. Analysis involved computing correlations of all study variables. Thereafter, associated variables were used as predictors. In each predictive analysis, the nurses' stress served as a control variable, W-F and F-W conflicts were the independent variables and significant others and supervisor supports were moderators. Interaction terms were derived from independent and moderator variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the findings of the study were not generally supportive of the hypotheses advanced, they nevertheless showed, amongst other findings, that F-W conflict predicted work satisfaction whilst W-F conflict predicted turnover intentions. Moreover, significant other support had a direct effect on family satisfaction whilst supervisor support moderated reports of W-F conflict and experiences of work satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed that inter-role models that appear to be established in the context of developed societies require some further investigations in South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":93959,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1436","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: South African nursing environments are marked by various incapacitating stressors. This study explores work-family (W-F) and family-work (F-W) conflicts as aspects of stress amongst nurses working with patients who have AIDS.

Objectives: The study sought to determine the value of W-F and F-W conflicts as predictors of work and family satisfaction, as well as turnover intentions and the moderating role of supervisor and significant other support, amongst nurses caring for patients with AIDS in public hospitals within the Capricorn and Mopani districts, Limpopo Province.

Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design, with data collected at one point only. Ninety-one nursing staff provided the data for the study by completing structured, self-administered surveys. Analysis involved computing correlations of all study variables. Thereafter, associated variables were used as predictors. In each predictive analysis, the nurses' stress served as a control variable, W-F and F-W conflicts were the independent variables and significant others and supervisor supports were moderators. Interaction terms were derived from independent and moderator variables.

Results: Although the findings of the study were not generally supportive of the hypotheses advanced, they nevertheless showed, amongst other findings, that F-W conflict predicted work satisfaction whilst W-F conflict predicted turnover intentions. Moreover, significant other support had a direct effect on family satisfaction whilst supervisor support moderated reports of W-F conflict and experiences of work satisfaction.

Conclusions: The study showed that inter-role models that appear to be established in the context of developed societies require some further investigations in South Africa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
照顾艾滋病患者的非洲护士之间的工作-家庭和家庭-工作冲突。
背景:南非的护理环境有各种各样的失能压力源。本研究探讨了工作-家庭(W-F)和家庭-工作(F-W)冲突作为艾滋病患者护理人员压力的方面。目的:本研究试图确定W-F和F-W冲突作为工作和家庭满意度的预测因素的价值,以及离职意向、主管和重要其他支持的调节作用,在林波波省Capricorn区和Mopani区公立医院照顾艾滋病患者的护士中。方法:该研究采用横断面设计,仅收集一点数据。91名护理人员通过完成结构化、自我管理的调查为研究提供了数据。分析包括计算所有研究变量的相关性。此后,相关变量被用作预测因素。在每项预测分析中,护士的压力是一个控制变量,W-F和F-W冲突是自变量,重要的其他因素和主管的支持是调节因素。相互作用项由自变量和调节变量导出。结果:尽管研究结果总体上不支持提出的假设,但它们表明,除其他发现外,F-W冲突预测工作满意度,而W-F冲突预测离职意向。此外,重要的其他支持对家庭满意度有直接影响,而主管的支持则调节了W-F冲突和工作满意度的报告。结论:研究表明,似乎在发达社会背景下建立的相互作用模式需要在南非进行一些进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nurse managers on healthy environments for adolescents living with intellectual disabilities. Midwives' experiences regarding recordkeeping during intrapartum care in Limpopo Province healthcare facilities. A conceptual framework for psychiatric nurses to facilitate medication compliance among adults living with depression. Impact of anxiety-related conditions on nursing students' academic excellence. Newly qualified primary care nurses' preparedness to make sound clinical judgements in practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1