Analysis of brazilian paintings of the 20th century: Suspects and authentics through in situ and Non-Invasive techniques.

N Thaumaturgo, C R F Souza, T J N A Fialho, R S Liarth, A P Oliveira, D Guimarães, V S Felix, A R Pimenta, A L C Oliveira, M B Oliveira, M A Oliveira, D S R Ferreira, R P Freitas
{"title":"Analysis of brazilian paintings of the 20th century: Suspects and authentics through in situ and Non-Invasive techniques.","authors":"N Thaumaturgo,&nbsp;C R F Souza,&nbsp;T J N A Fialho,&nbsp;R S Liarth,&nbsp;A P Oliveira,&nbsp;D Guimarães,&nbsp;V S Felix,&nbsp;A R Pimenta,&nbsp;A L C Oliveira,&nbsp;M B Oliveira,&nbsp;M A Oliveira,&nbsp;D S R Ferreira,&nbsp;R P Freitas","doi":"10.1016/j.saa.2023.123431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work studied suspicious and authentic artworks by Brazilian painters Ivan Serpa, Ismael Nery, and Iberê Camargo by XRF, FTIR, OM, and MA-XRF techniques. The studies made it possible to verify that all suspicious artworks are counterfeit artifacts. The analyses were conducted in situ, and different approaches were applied for data treatment. For example, principal component analysis and spectral deconvolution were performed on the XRF data. From these methods, it was possible to verify that the suspect artworks by Ivan Serpa and Iberê Camargo have different materiality than the authentic paintings. Additionally, MA-XRF images did not reveal the presence of a polychrome preparation layer in the suspicious paintings by Ivan Serpa. The suspect artworks from Ismael Nery exhibited a Ca-K/Ti-K ratio that indicates they were created on a low-quality paper support, which is not suitable for paintings. The differences in materials used in the suspicious and authentic artworks are further supported by the FTIR and OM results. In addition to the physicochemical analysis, the paintings were studies graphotechnical examinations, financial evaluations, and artistic analyses that demonstrated they were counterfeit artifacts. The results of the analysis demonstrate how physicochemical techniques can contribute to the forensic investigation of paintings. However, this work highlights the importance of applying distinct treatments to the XRF data in order to accentuate the differences between the suspect and authentic artworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94213,"journal":{"name":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy","volume":"304 ","pages":"123431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2023.123431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work studied suspicious and authentic artworks by Brazilian painters Ivan Serpa, Ismael Nery, and Iberê Camargo by XRF, FTIR, OM, and MA-XRF techniques. The studies made it possible to verify that all suspicious artworks are counterfeit artifacts. The analyses were conducted in situ, and different approaches were applied for data treatment. For example, principal component analysis and spectral deconvolution were performed on the XRF data. From these methods, it was possible to verify that the suspect artworks by Ivan Serpa and Iberê Camargo have different materiality than the authentic paintings. Additionally, MA-XRF images did not reveal the presence of a polychrome preparation layer in the suspicious paintings by Ivan Serpa. The suspect artworks from Ismael Nery exhibited a Ca-K/Ti-K ratio that indicates they were created on a low-quality paper support, which is not suitable for paintings. The differences in materials used in the suspicious and authentic artworks are further supported by the FTIR and OM results. In addition to the physicochemical analysis, the paintings were studies graphotechnical examinations, financial evaluations, and artistic analyses that demonstrated they were counterfeit artifacts. The results of the analysis demonstrate how physicochemical techniques can contribute to the forensic investigation of paintings. However, this work highlights the importance of applying distinct treatments to the XRF data in order to accentuate the differences between the suspect and authentic artworks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪巴西绘画分析:通过原位和非侵入性技术的怀疑和真实。
这幅作品通过XRF、FTIR、OM和MA-XRF技术研究了巴西画家伊万·塞尔帕、伊斯梅尔·内里和伊贝尔·卡马戈的可疑和真实艺术品。这些研究使得验证所有可疑艺术品都是伪造的文物成为可能。分析是在现场进行的,数据处理采用了不同的方法。例如,对XRF数据进行了主成分分析和光谱反褶积。通过这些方法,可以验证伊凡·塞尔帕和伊伯·卡马尔戈的可疑艺术品与真迹具有不同的物质性。此外,MA-XRF图像没有显示Ivan Serpa的可疑画作中存在多色准备层。Ismael Nery的可疑艺术品显示出Ca-K/Ti-K比例,这表明它们是在低质量的纸支架上创作的,不适合绘画。FTIR和OM结果进一步支持了可疑和真实艺术品中使用的材料的差异。除了物理化学分析外,这些画还进行了研究——笔迹技术检查、财务评估和艺术分析,证明它们是赝品。分析结果表明,物理化学技术可以为绘画的法医调查做出贡献。然而,这项工作强调了对XRF数据进行不同处理的重要性,以强调可疑艺术品和真迹之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Age estimation of Phormia regina pupae based on ATR-FTIR and chemometrics. Exploring the charge transfer enhancement mechanism in selective SERS detection with Mo1-xWxS2@Ag2S nanosheets. Improving monitoring of dissolved organic matter from the wastewater treatment plant to the receiving environment: A new high-frequency in situ fluorescence sensor capable of analyzing 29 pairs of Ex/Em wavelengths. Theoretical study of excited state dynamics of a ratiometric fluorescent probe for detection of SO2 derivatives. A Dicyanoisophorone-based Fluorescent Turn-on Probe for Rapid Detecting Thiophenol in Aqueous Medium and Living Cell Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1