A cost benefit analysis of a virtual overdose monitoring service/mobile overdose response service: the national overdose response service.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1186/s13011-023-00565-8
William Rioux, Benjamin Enns, Jennifer Jackson, Hena Quereshi, Mike Irvine, S Monty Ghosh
{"title":"A cost benefit analysis of a virtual overdose monitoring service/mobile overdose response service: the national overdose response service.","authors":"William Rioux, Benjamin Enns, Jennifer Jackson, Hena Quereshi, Mike Irvine, S Monty Ghosh","doi":"10.1186/s13011-023-00565-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The overdose crisis continues across Canada which calls for novel harm reduction strategies. Previous research indicates that a majority of eHealth solutions are cost-effective however current literature on the cost-benefit of eHealth for harm reduction is sparse. The National Overdose Response Service (NORS) is a Canada-wide telephone-based harm reduction service. Service users can call the phone number and connect to a peer who can virtually monitor the substance use session and dispatch appropriate interventions in the case of overdose.</p><p><strong>Objectives of the research/project: </strong>We aim to assess the cost-benefit of NORS by comparing the estimated cost-savings from prevented overdose mortality to the operating costs of the program, alongside healthcare costs associated with its operation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data around systems costs and operational costs were gathered for our calculations. Our primary outcome was cost-benefit ratios, derived from estimates and models of mortality rates in current literature and value of life lost. We presented our main results across a range of values for costs and the probability of death following an unwitnessed overdose. These values were utilized to calculate cost-benefit ratios and value per dollar spent on service provision by NORS over the length of the program's operation (December 2020-2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the total funded lifespan of the program, and using a Monte Carlo estimate, the benefit-to-cost ratio of the NORS program was 8.59 (1.53-15.28) per dollar spent, depending on estimated mortality rates following unwitnessed overdose and program operation costs. Further, we conservatively estimate that early community-based naloxone intervention results in healthcare system savings of $4470.82 per overdose response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found the NORS program to have a positive benefit-to-cost ratio when the probability of death following an unwitnessed overdose was greater than 5%. NORS and potentially other virtual overdose monitoring services have the potential to be cost-effective solutions for managing the drug poisoning crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22041,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548617/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00565-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The overdose crisis continues across Canada which calls for novel harm reduction strategies. Previous research indicates that a majority of eHealth solutions are cost-effective however current literature on the cost-benefit of eHealth for harm reduction is sparse. The National Overdose Response Service (NORS) is a Canada-wide telephone-based harm reduction service. Service users can call the phone number and connect to a peer who can virtually monitor the substance use session and dispatch appropriate interventions in the case of overdose.

Objectives of the research/project: We aim to assess the cost-benefit of NORS by comparing the estimated cost-savings from prevented overdose mortality to the operating costs of the program, alongside healthcare costs associated with its operation.

Methods: Data around systems costs and operational costs were gathered for our calculations. Our primary outcome was cost-benefit ratios, derived from estimates and models of mortality rates in current literature and value of life lost. We presented our main results across a range of values for costs and the probability of death following an unwitnessed overdose. These values were utilized to calculate cost-benefit ratios and value per dollar spent on service provision by NORS over the length of the program's operation (December 2020-2022).

Results: Over the total funded lifespan of the program, and using a Monte Carlo estimate, the benefit-to-cost ratio of the NORS program was 8.59 (1.53-15.28) per dollar spent, depending on estimated mortality rates following unwitnessed overdose and program operation costs. Further, we conservatively estimate that early community-based naloxone intervention results in healthcare system savings of $4470.82 per overdose response.

Conclusions: We found the NORS program to have a positive benefit-to-cost ratio when the probability of death following an unwitnessed overdose was greater than 5%. NORS and potentially other virtual overdose monitoring services have the potential to be cost-effective solutions for managing the drug poisoning crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟过量监测服务/移动过量反应服务的成本效益分析:国家过量反应服务。
背景:过量用药危机在加拿大各地持续,这需要新的减少伤害策略。先前的研究表明,大多数电子健康解决方案都具有成本效益,但目前关于电子健康减少危害的成本效益的文献很少。国家过量用药反应服务(NORS)是加拿大范围内的一项基于电话的减少伤害服务。服务用户可以拨打电话号码并连接到一位同行,后者可以虚拟监控药物使用会话,并在药物过量的情况下采取适当的干预措施。研究/项目的目标:我们旨在通过将预防过量死亡的估计成本节约与该项目的运营成本以及与其运营相关的医疗成本进行比较,来评估NORS的成本效益。方法:收集有关系统成本和运营成本的数据进行计算。我们的主要结果是成本效益比,来源于当前文献中死亡率和生命损失价值的估计和模型。我们介绍了一系列成本值和未经麻醉的过量用药后死亡概率的主要结果。这些值用于计算成本效益比和NORS在项目运营期间(2020-2022年12月)在服务提供上花费的每美元价值。结果:在项目的总资助寿命内,使用蒙特卡罗估计,NORS项目的效益与成本比为8.59(1.53-15.28)每美元花费,这取决于未用药过量后的估计死亡率和项目操作成本。此外,我们保守估计,早期基于社区的纳洛酮干预可使医疗系统每次服药过量反应节省4470.82美元。结论:我们发现,当未经麻醉的过量用药后死亡的概率大于5%时,NORS计划的效益与成本比为正。NORS和其他潜在的虚拟过量监测服务有可能成为管理药物中毒危机的成本效益高的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses research concerning substance abuse, with a focus on policy issues. The journal aims to provide an environment for the exchange of ideas, new research, consensus papers, and critical reviews, to bridge the established fields that share a mutual goal of reducing the harms from substance use. These fields include: legislation pertaining to substance use; correctional supervision of people with substance use disorder; medical treatment and screening; mental health services; research; and evaluation of substance use disorder programs.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing the drug addiction treatment service by introducing a new residential treatment model in the Philippines: A qualitative study. COVID-19 public health restrictions and opioid overdoes: a summative content analysis of emergency medical services records in three Texas counties. The relationship between insecure attachment and nicotine dependence among users of classic cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products: a moderated mediation model. Access and barriers to safer supply prescribing during a toxic drug emergency: a mixed methods study of implementation in British Columbia, Canada. Initiation and/or re-initiation of drug use among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada from 2021 to 2022: a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1