Dashboard of Short-Term Postoperative Patient Outcomes for Anesthesiologists: Development and Preliminary Evaluation.

Rama Syamala Sreepada, Ai Ching Chang, Nicholas C West, Jonath Sujan, Brendan Lai, Andrew K Poznikoff, Rebecca Munk, Norbert R Froese, James C Chen, Matthias Görges
{"title":"Dashboard of Short-Term Postoperative Patient Outcomes for Anesthesiologists: Development and Preliminary Evaluation.","authors":"Rama Syamala Sreepada,&nbsp;Ai Ching Chang,&nbsp;Nicholas C West,&nbsp;Jonath Sujan,&nbsp;Brendan Lai,&nbsp;Andrew K Poznikoff,&nbsp;Rebecca Munk,&nbsp;Norbert R Froese,&nbsp;James C Chen,&nbsp;Matthias Görges","doi":"10.2196/47398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesiologists require an understanding of their patients' outcomes to evaluate their performance and improve their practice. Traditionally, anesthesiologists had limited information about their surgical outpatients' outcomes due to minimal contact post discharge. Leveraging digital health innovations for analyzing personal and population outcomes may improve perioperative care. BC Children's Hospital's postoperative follow-up registry for outpatient surgeries collects short-term outcomes such as pain, nausea, and vomiting. Yet, these data were previously not available to anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement study aimed to visualize postoperative outcome data to allow anesthesiologists to reflect on their care and compare their performance with their peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The postoperative follow-up registry contains nurse-reported postoperative outcomes, including opioid and antiemetic administration in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), and family-reported outcomes, including pain, nausea, and vomiting, within 24 hours post discharge. Dashboards were iteratively co-designed with 5 anesthesiologists, and a department-wide usability survey gathered anesthesiologists' feedback on the dashboards, allowing further design improvements. A final dashboard version has been deployed, with data updated weekly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dashboard contains three sections: (1) 24-hour outcomes, (2) PACU outcomes, and (3) a practice profile containing individual anesthesiologist's case mix, grouped by age groups, sex, and surgical service. At the time of evaluation, the dashboard included 24-hour data from 7877 cases collected from September 2020 to February 2023 and PACU data from 8716 cases collected from April 2021 to February 2023. The co-design process and usability evaluation indicated that anesthesiologists preferred simpler designs for data summaries but also required the ability to explore details of specific outcomes and cases if needed. Anesthesiologists considered security and confidentiality to be key features of the design and most deemed the dashboard information useful and potentially beneficial for their practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We designed and deployed a dynamic, personalized dashboard for anesthesiologists to review their outpatients' short-term postoperative outcomes. This dashboard facilitates personal reflection on individual practice in the context of peer and departmental performance and, hence, the opportunity to evaluate iterative practice changes. Further work is required to establish their effect on improving individual and department performance and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"e47398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/47398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anesthesiologists require an understanding of their patients' outcomes to evaluate their performance and improve their practice. Traditionally, anesthesiologists had limited information about their surgical outpatients' outcomes due to minimal contact post discharge. Leveraging digital health innovations for analyzing personal and population outcomes may improve perioperative care. BC Children's Hospital's postoperative follow-up registry for outpatient surgeries collects short-term outcomes such as pain, nausea, and vomiting. Yet, these data were previously not available to anesthesiologists.

Objective: This quality improvement study aimed to visualize postoperative outcome data to allow anesthesiologists to reflect on their care and compare their performance with their peers.

Methods: The postoperative follow-up registry contains nurse-reported postoperative outcomes, including opioid and antiemetic administration in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), and family-reported outcomes, including pain, nausea, and vomiting, within 24 hours post discharge. Dashboards were iteratively co-designed with 5 anesthesiologists, and a department-wide usability survey gathered anesthesiologists' feedback on the dashboards, allowing further design improvements. A final dashboard version has been deployed, with data updated weekly.

Results: The dashboard contains three sections: (1) 24-hour outcomes, (2) PACU outcomes, and (3) a practice profile containing individual anesthesiologist's case mix, grouped by age groups, sex, and surgical service. At the time of evaluation, the dashboard included 24-hour data from 7877 cases collected from September 2020 to February 2023 and PACU data from 8716 cases collected from April 2021 to February 2023. The co-design process and usability evaluation indicated that anesthesiologists preferred simpler designs for data summaries but also required the ability to explore details of specific outcomes and cases if needed. Anesthesiologists considered security and confidentiality to be key features of the design and most deemed the dashboard information useful and potentially beneficial for their practice.

Conclusions: We designed and deployed a dynamic, personalized dashboard for anesthesiologists to review their outpatients' short-term postoperative outcomes. This dashboard facilitates personal reflection on individual practice in the context of peer and departmental performance and, hence, the opportunity to evaluate iterative practice changes. Further work is required to establish their effect on improving individual and department performance and patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉师术后短期患者结果仪表板:开发和初步评估。
背景:麻醉师需要了解患者的结果,以评估他们的表现并改进他们的实践。传统上,由于出院后接触最少,麻醉师对门诊手术结果的了解有限。利用数字健康创新来分析个人和人群的结果可能会改善围手术期护理。不列颠哥伦比亚省儿童医院的门诊手术术后随访登记收集了疼痛、恶心和呕吐等短期结果。然而,麻醉师以前无法获得这些数据。目的:这项质量改进研究旨在可视化术后结果数据,让麻醉师反思他们的护理,并将他们的表现与同行进行比较。方法:术后随访登记包括护士报告的术后结果,包括麻醉后护理室(PACU)的阿片类药物和止吐药,以及出院后24小时内家庭报告的结果,包括疼痛、恶心和呕吐。仪表板是与5名麻醉师反复共同设计的,一项全部门的可用性调查收集了麻醉师对仪表板的反馈,从而进一步改进了设计。已经部署了最终的仪表板版本,每周更新数据。结果:仪表板包含三个部分:(1)24小时结果,(2)PACU结果,以及(3)包含麻醉师个人病例组合的实践概况,按年龄组、性别和手术服务分组。在评估时,仪表盘包括2020年9月至2023年2月收集的7877例病例的24小时数据,以及2021年4月至2022月收集到的8716例病例的PACU数据。联合设计过程和可用性评估表明,麻醉师更喜欢更简单的数据摘要设计,但也需要在需要时探索具体结果和病例的细节。麻醉师认为安全性和保密性是设计的关键特征,大多数人认为仪表板信息对他们的实践有用且可能有益。结论:我们为麻醉师设计并部署了一个动态、个性化的仪表盘,用于审查门诊患者的短期术后结果。该仪表板有助于在同行和部门绩效的背景下对个人实践进行个人反思,从而有机会评估迭代实践的变化。需要进一步的工作来确定它们对改善个人和部门绩效以及患者结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Hospital Staff and Patients on Environmental Sustainability in the Operating Room: Quality Improvement Survey Study. Impact of Consumer Wearables Data on Pediatric Surgery Clinicians' Management: Multi-Institutional Scenario-Based Usability Study. Blood Bonds: Transforming Blood Donation Through Innovation, Inclusion, and Engagement. Use of Biofeedback-Based Virtual Reality in Pediatric Perioperative and Postoperative Settings: Observational Study. Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1