{"title":"Hepatic Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol for Gout Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Christiyanti Dewi, Falerina Puspita, Irma Melyani Puspitasari, Neily Zakiyah","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S424598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to systematically review the hepatic safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in adult gout patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for information using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were to review all randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared allopurinol and febuxostat for adult gout patients that had an assessment of liver function outcomes. Non-English studies on case reports, case series, reviews, and abstracts only were excluded. We extracted information from the studies to answer the research question, ie, study design, publication year, population, sample size, patient characterization, duration, Jadad score, and liver function outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 512 publications from the databases and identified 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Ten out of 11 included studies were double-blind RCTs. In the majority of the included studies, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of hepatic safety data between febuxostat and allopurinol. However, in studies where allopurinol titration was used, it posed a challenge to maintain blinding. Notably, consistent adverse events related to liver function findings were observed across all reviewed RCTs. These abnormal liver function test results sometimes led to study withdrawal based on the investigators' assessment. Nevertheless, the investigators classified most liver function test elevations as mild to moderate in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis concluded that adult gout patients enrolled in the included RCTs exhibited similar hepatic safety profiles for both febuxostat and allopurinol treatment. Liver function abnormalities were identified in all RCTs included in this systematic review. Consequently, it is important for the product labeling information of both allopurinol and febuxostat to present and describe the current safety data to guide healthcare practitioners when prescribing these medications to patients. Pharmacovigilance and post-marketing pharmacoepidemiology data are essential in establishing the comprehensive safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/10/tcrm-19-731.PMC10516211.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S424598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to systematically review the hepatic safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in adult gout patients.
Methods: We searched for information using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were to review all randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared allopurinol and febuxostat for adult gout patients that had an assessment of liver function outcomes. Non-English studies on case reports, case series, reviews, and abstracts only were excluded. We extracted information from the studies to answer the research question, ie, study design, publication year, population, sample size, patient characterization, duration, Jadad score, and liver function outcomes.
Results: We screened 512 publications from the databases and identified 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Ten out of 11 included studies were double-blind RCTs. In the majority of the included studies, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of hepatic safety data between febuxostat and allopurinol. However, in studies where allopurinol titration was used, it posed a challenge to maintain blinding. Notably, consistent adverse events related to liver function findings were observed across all reviewed RCTs. These abnormal liver function test results sometimes led to study withdrawal based on the investigators' assessment. Nevertheless, the investigators classified most liver function test elevations as mild to moderate in severity.
Conclusion: Our analysis concluded that adult gout patients enrolled in the included RCTs exhibited similar hepatic safety profiles for both febuxostat and allopurinol treatment. Liver function abnormalities were identified in all RCTs included in this systematic review. Consequently, it is important for the product labeling information of both allopurinol and febuxostat to present and describe the current safety data to guide healthcare practitioners when prescribing these medications to patients. Pharmacovigilance and post-marketing pharmacoepidemiology data are essential in establishing the comprehensive safety profile.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.