Effects of aerobic and combined training on pain-free walking distance and health-related quality of life in patients with peripheral artery disease: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Pub Date : 2023-08-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1677-5449.202300242
Eduardo Lima Garcia, Adamastor Humberto Pereira, Marcio Garcia Menezes, Alexandre Araújo Pereira, Ricardo Stein, Leandro Tolfo Franzoni, Luiz Claudio Danzmann, Antônio Cardoso Dos Santos
{"title":"Effects of aerobic and combined training on pain-free walking distance and health-related quality of life in patients with peripheral artery disease: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Eduardo Lima Garcia,&nbsp;Adamastor Humberto Pereira,&nbsp;Marcio Garcia Menezes,&nbsp;Alexandre Araújo Pereira,&nbsp;Ricardo Stein,&nbsp;Leandro Tolfo Franzoni,&nbsp;Luiz Claudio Danzmann,&nbsp;Antônio Cardoso Dos Santos","doi":"10.1590/1677-5449.202300242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decreased walking ability in patients with peripheral arterial disease is often a clinical problem and limits the quality of life and daily activities of these subjects. physical exercise is important in this scenario, as it improves both the daily walking distance and the ability to withstand intermittent claudication related to the limitations of the peripheral disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to compare the effects of two types of exercise training (aerobic training and aerobic training combined with resistance exercises) on pain-free walking distance (PFWD) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a sample composed of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with claudication symptoms were randomized to either aerobic control (AC) <b>N= 9,</b> or combined training (CT) N= 8, (24 sixty-minute sessions, twice a week). The total walking distance until onset of pain due to claudication was assessed using the 6-minute walk test and HRQoL was measured using the WHOQOL-bref questionnaire (general and specific domains) at baseline and after training. We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to assess the differences between groups for the PFWD and HRQoL domains, testing the main group and time effects and their respective interaction effects. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients (mean age 63±9 years; 53% male) completed the study. Both groups experienced improvement in claudication, as reflected by a significant increase in PFWD: AC, 149 m to 299 m (P<0.001); CT, 156 m to 253 m (P<0.001). HRQoL domains also improved similarly in both groups (physical capacity, psychological aspects, and self-reported quality of life; P=0.001, P=0.003, and P=0.011 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both aerobic and combined training similarly improved PFWD and HRQoL in PAD patients. There are no advantages in adding strength training to conventional aerobic training. This study does not support the conclusion that combined training is a good strategy for these patients when compared with classic training.</p>","PeriodicalId":14814,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202300242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decreased walking ability in patients with peripheral arterial disease is often a clinical problem and limits the quality of life and daily activities of these subjects. physical exercise is important in this scenario, as it improves both the daily walking distance and the ability to withstand intermittent claudication related to the limitations of the peripheral disease.

Objectives: Our aim was to compare the effects of two types of exercise training (aerobic training and aerobic training combined with resistance exercises) on pain-free walking distance (PFWD) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a sample composed of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods: Twenty patients with claudication symptoms were randomized to either aerobic control (AC) N= 9, or combined training (CT) N= 8, (24 sixty-minute sessions, twice a week). The total walking distance until onset of pain due to claudication was assessed using the 6-minute walk test and HRQoL was measured using the WHOQOL-bref questionnaire (general and specific domains) at baseline and after training. We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to assess the differences between groups for the PFWD and HRQoL domains, testing the main group and time effects and their respective interaction effects. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Seventeen patients (mean age 63±9 years; 53% male) completed the study. Both groups experienced improvement in claudication, as reflected by a significant increase in PFWD: AC, 149 m to 299 m (P<0.001); CT, 156 m to 253 m (P<0.001). HRQoL domains also improved similarly in both groups (physical capacity, psychological aspects, and self-reported quality of life; P=0.001, P=0.003, and P=0.011 respectively).

Conclusions: Both aerobic and combined training similarly improved PFWD and HRQoL in PAD patients. There are no advantages in adding strength training to conventional aerobic training. This study does not support the conclusion that combined training is a good strategy for these patients when compared with classic training.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有氧和联合训练对外周动脉疾病患者无痛步行距离和健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
背景:外周动脉疾病患者的行走能力下降通常是一个临床问题,并限制了这些受试者的生活质量和日常活动。在这种情况下,体育锻炼很重要,因为它既能提高日常步行距离,又能提高抵抗与周围疾病局限性相关的间歇性跛行的能力。目的:我们的目的是在一个由外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者组成的样本中比较两种类型的运动训练(有氧训练和有氧训练结合阻力训练)对无痛步行距离(PFWD)和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响(AC)N=9,或联合训练(CT)N=8,(24次60分钟的训练,每周两次)。在基线和训练后,使用6分钟步行测试评估直到因跛行而疼痛发作的总步行距离,并使用WHOQOL bref问卷(一般和特定领域)测量HRQoL。我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)来评估PFWD和HRQoL领域的组间差异,测试主要的组和时间效应及其各自的相互作用效应。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:17名患者(平均年龄63±9岁;53%为男性)完成了研究。两组的跛行均有改善,PFWD:AC显著增加,149米至299米(P结论:有氧训练和联合训练同样改善了PAD患者的PFWD和HRQoL。在传统有氧训练基础上增加力量训练没有优势。与经典训练相比,联合训练对这些患者来说是一种好的策略,这项研究不支持这一结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Jornal Vascular Brasileiro is editated and published quaterly to select and disseminate high-quality scientific contents concerning original research, novel surgical and diagnostic techniques, and clinical observations in the field of vascular surgery, angiology, and endovascular surgery. Its abbreviated title is J. Vasc. Bras., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sectional, multicenter study comparing sex differences in patients undergoing endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from the São Paulo State University Provincial Hospitals Registry (RHEUNI). Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on peripheral artery disease. Analysis of the efficacy of endovascular treatment with foam sclerotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome with ultrasound assessment. Treatment of penetrating injuries of the retrohepatic vena cava: systematic review protocol. Response to 1064 nm Nd:YAG LASER in treatment of vulvar Fordyce's Angiokeratoma: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1