Selma Gaily-Luoma, Jukka Valkonen, Juha Holma, Aarno Laitila
{"title":"Client-reported impact of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program.","authors":"Selma Gaily-Luoma, Jukka Valkonen, Juha Holma, Aarno Laitila","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2023.2259070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A history of attempted suicide is the most significant predictor of suicidal death. Several brief interventions aimed at tertiary suicide prevention have been investigated in clinical trials. However, suicide attempt survivors' experiences of such interventions have rarely been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how suicide attempt survivors perceive the impact of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We interviewed 14 Finnish adults who had received ASSIP as an adjunct to treatment as usual. Semi-structured interviews took place 4-10 weeks after the last ASSIP session. A conventional content analysis of the interview data is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three core categories depicting ASSIP's perceived impact were identified. The core category <i>life-affirming change</i> comprised subcategories of <i>feeling better</i>, <i>thinking differently</i>, <i>acting differently</i>, and <i>having new resources</i>. The core category <i>collateral effects</i> comprised <i>difficult feelings</i> and <i>cognitive overload</i>. The core category <i>incompleteness of change</i> comprised <i>lack of desired change</i>, <i>gains as incomplete</i>, <i>need for sustenance</i>, and <i>unrealized potential</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clients perceived ASSIP as effectively facilitating life-affirming change but agreed that further support was necessary to retain and build on these gains. Identified needs for improvement included more predictable post-ASSIP service paths and more support for involving affected loved ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2259070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A history of attempted suicide is the most significant predictor of suicidal death. Several brief interventions aimed at tertiary suicide prevention have been investigated in clinical trials. However, suicide attempt survivors' experiences of such interventions have rarely been reported.
Objective: To explore how suicide attempt survivors perceive the impact of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP).
Method: We interviewed 14 Finnish adults who had received ASSIP as an adjunct to treatment as usual. Semi-structured interviews took place 4-10 weeks after the last ASSIP session. A conventional content analysis of the interview data is presented.
Results: Three core categories depicting ASSIP's perceived impact were identified. The core category life-affirming change comprised subcategories of feeling better, thinking differently, acting differently, and having new resources. The core category collateral effects comprised difficult feelings and cognitive overload. The core category incompleteness of change comprised lack of desired change, gains as incomplete, need for sustenance, and unrealized potential.
Conclusion: Clients perceived ASSIP as effectively facilitating life-affirming change but agreed that further support was necessary to retain and build on these gains. Identified needs for improvement included more predictable post-ASSIP service paths and more support for involving affected loved ones.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.