Challenges and directions in analytical paleobiology.

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Paleobiology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1017/pab.2023.3
Erin M Dillon, Emma M Dunne, Tom M Womack, Miranta Kouvari, Ekaterina Larina, Jordan Ray Claytor, Angelina Ivkić, Mark Juhn, Pablo S Milla Carmona, Selina Viktor Robson, Anwesha Saha, Jaime A Villafaña, Michelle E Zill
{"title":"Challenges and directions in analytical paleobiology.","authors":"Erin M Dillon,&nbsp;Emma M Dunne,&nbsp;Tom M Womack,&nbsp;Miranta Kouvari,&nbsp;Ekaterina Larina,&nbsp;Jordan Ray Claytor,&nbsp;Angelina Ivkić,&nbsp;Mark Juhn,&nbsp;Pablo S Milla Carmona,&nbsp;Selina Viktor Robson,&nbsp;Anwesha Saha,&nbsp;Jaime A Villafaña,&nbsp;Michelle E Zill","doi":"10.1017/pab.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last 50 years, access to new data and analytical tools has expanded the study of analytical paleobiology, contributing to innovative analyses of biodiversity dynamics over Earth's history. Despite-or even spurred by-this growing availability of resources, analytical paleobiology faces deep-rooted obstacles that stem from the need for more equitable access to data and best practices to guide analyses of the fossil record. Recent progress has been accelerated by a collective push toward more collaborative, interdisciplinary, and open science, especially by early-career researchers. Here, we survey four challenges facing analytical paleobiology from an early-career perspective: (1) accounting for biases when interpreting the fossil record; (2) integrating fossil and modern biodiversity data; (3) building data science skills; and (4) increasing data accessibility and equity. We discuss recent efforts to address each challenge, highlight persisting barriers, and identify tools that have advanced analytical work. Given the inherent linkages between these challenges, we encourage discourse across disciplines to find common solutions. We also affirm the need for systemic changes that reevaluate how we conduct and share paleobiological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54646,"journal":{"name":"Paleobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7615171/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paleobiology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2023.3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, access to new data and analytical tools has expanded the study of analytical paleobiology, contributing to innovative analyses of biodiversity dynamics over Earth's history. Despite-or even spurred by-this growing availability of resources, analytical paleobiology faces deep-rooted obstacles that stem from the need for more equitable access to data and best practices to guide analyses of the fossil record. Recent progress has been accelerated by a collective push toward more collaborative, interdisciplinary, and open science, especially by early-career researchers. Here, we survey four challenges facing analytical paleobiology from an early-career perspective: (1) accounting for biases when interpreting the fossil record; (2) integrating fossil and modern biodiversity data; (3) building data science skills; and (4) increasing data accessibility and equity. We discuss recent efforts to address each challenge, highlight persisting barriers, and identify tools that have advanced analytical work. Given the inherent linkages between these challenges, we encourage discourse across disciplines to find common solutions. We also affirm the need for systemic changes that reevaluate how we conduct and share paleobiological research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析古生物学的挑战和方向。
在过去的50年里,获得新数据和分析工具扩大了分析古生物学的研究,有助于对地球历史上的生物多样性动态进行创新分析。尽管资源不断增加,甚至受到资源不断增加的刺激,但分析古生物学面临着根深蒂固的障碍,这些障碍源于需要更公平地获取数据和最佳实践来指导化石记录的分析。最近的进展因集体推动更具协作性、跨学科和开放性的科学而加速,尤其是早期职业研究人员。在这里,我们从职业生涯早期的角度调查了分析古生物学面临的四个挑战:(1)解释化石记录时的偏见;(2) 整合化石和现代生物多样性数据;(3) 培养数据科学技能;以及(4)提高数据的可访问性和公平性。我们讨论了最近为应对每一项挑战所做的努力,强调了持续存在的障碍,并确定了具有先进分析工作的工具。鉴于这些挑战之间的内在联系,我们鼓励跨学科的讨论,以找到共同的解决方案。我们还确认需要进行系统性变革,重新评估我们如何进行和共享古生物学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Paleobiology
Paleobiology 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Paleobiology publishes original contributions of any length (but normally 10-50 manuscript pages) dealing with any aspect of biological paleontology. Emphasis is placed on biological or paleobiological processes and patterns, including macroevolution, extinction, diversification, speciation, functional morphology, bio-geography, phylogeny, paleoecology, molecular paleontology, taphonomy, natural selection and patterns of variation, abundance, and distribution in space and time, among others. Taxonomic papers are welcome if they have significant and broad applications. Papers concerning research on recent organisms and systems are appropriate if they are of particular interest to paleontologists. Papers should typically interest readers from more than one specialty. Proposals for symposium volumes should be discussed in advance with the editors.
期刊最新文献
The Fezouata Shale Formation biota is typical for the high latitudes of the Early Ordovician—a quantitative approach Aligning paleobiological research with conservation priorities using elasmobranchs as a model Morphometric analysis of the Late Cretaceous Placenticeras of Alabama, USA: sexual dimorphism, allometry, and implications for taxonomy Reflections on punctuated equilibria The evolution of femoral morphology in giant non-avian theropod dinosaurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1