Efficacy of the DoctorVox Voice Therapy Technique for the Management of Vocal Fold Nodules.

IF 0.7 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-18 DOI:10.4274/tao.2023.2021-11-1
İlter Denizoğlu, Mustafa Şahin, Elif Şahin Orhon
{"title":"Efficacy of the DoctorVox Voice Therapy Technique for the Management of Vocal Fold Nodules.","authors":"İlter Denizoğlu,&nbsp;Mustafa Şahin,&nbsp;Elif Şahin Orhon","doi":"10.4274/tao.2023.2021-11-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vocal fold nodules (VFNs) are among the most common causes of dysphonia. Phono-laryngeal microsurgery, pharmacological treatments, and voice therapy (VT) have been used for treating VFNs. VT has been advocated as the primary treatment of choice. This study investigated the efficacy of the DoctorVox Voice therapy technique (DVT) for treating VFNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 38 patients with VFNs and 40 individuals without any voice problem (control group) were included. All patients received the DVT program. Otorhinolaryngology examination, videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS), and acoustic analysis (SPL, mean F0, jitter %, shimmer %, NHR) were performed at pretreatment, one and six months after the end of treatment. The voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) and the GRB scales were used for perceptual voice evaluation. GRB and VLS scorings were done blindly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the pretreatment values, the first- and the sixth-month values after treatment demonstrated a significant decrease in VHI-10 (19.5 vs. 5.1), GRB (2.3 vs 0.68 for G value) and VLS scores, SPL (54.4 vs 66.1 dB), F0 (201 vs. 227 Hz), jitter % (1.46 vs 0.85), shimmer % (3.27 vs 2.51), NHR (1.15 vs. 0.46) values among patients. Most of the voice parameters in the sixth month after the DVT program did not differ significantly from those of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DVT was found to be an effective method in VFN treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/12/tao-61-66.PMC10506522.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2023.2021-11-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vocal fold nodules (VFNs) are among the most common causes of dysphonia. Phono-laryngeal microsurgery, pharmacological treatments, and voice therapy (VT) have been used for treating VFNs. VT has been advocated as the primary treatment of choice. This study investigated the efficacy of the DoctorVox Voice therapy technique (DVT) for treating VFNs.

Methods: A total of 38 patients with VFNs and 40 individuals without any voice problem (control group) were included. All patients received the DVT program. Otorhinolaryngology examination, videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS), and acoustic analysis (SPL, mean F0, jitter %, shimmer %, NHR) were performed at pretreatment, one and six months after the end of treatment. The voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) and the GRB scales were used for perceptual voice evaluation. GRB and VLS scorings were done blindly.

Results: Compared with the pretreatment values, the first- and the sixth-month values after treatment demonstrated a significant decrease in VHI-10 (19.5 vs. 5.1), GRB (2.3 vs 0.68 for G value) and VLS scores, SPL (54.4 vs 66.1 dB), F0 (201 vs. 227 Hz), jitter % (1.46 vs 0.85), shimmer % (3.27 vs 2.51), NHR (1.15 vs. 0.46) values among patients. Most of the voice parameters in the sixth month after the DVT program did not differ significantly from those of the control group.

Conclusion: The DVT was found to be an effective method in VFN treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DoctorVox语音治疗技术治疗声带小结的疗效。
目的:声带小结(VFNs)是发音困难最常见的病因之一。发音喉显微外科手术、药物治疗和语音治疗(VT)已被用于治疗VFN。室性心动过速被认为是首选的主要治疗方法。本研究调查了DoctorVox语音治疗技术(DVT)治疗VFNs的疗效。方法:共纳入38名VFNs患者和40名没有任何语音问题的患者(对照组)。所有患者均接受DVT方案。在治疗前、治疗结束后1个月和6个月进行耳鼻喉科检查、视频喉镜检查(VLS)和声学分析(SPL、平均F0、抖动%、微光%、NHR)。语音障碍指数-10(VHI-10)和GRB量表用于感知语音评估。GRB和VLS烧焦是盲目进行的。结果:与治疗前相比,治疗后第一个月和第六个月的值显示,患者的VHI-10(19.5 vs.5.1)、GRB(2.3 vs.0.68 G值)和VLS评分、SPL(54.4 vs.66.1dB)、F0(201 vs.227 Hz)、抖动%(1.46 vs.0.85)、微光%(3.27 vs.2.51)和NHR(1.15 vs.0.46)值显著降低。DVT程序后第6个月的大多数语音参数与对照组没有显著差异。结论:DVT是治疗VFN的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Angiosarcoma Arising in a Vagal Schwannoma - Report and Literature Review Patulous Eustachian Tube Accompanied by Internal Carotid Artery Anomalies Retrospective Analysis of Laryngeal Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Referral Center Case Series of Endoscopic Transoral Excision of Huge Parapharyngeal Tumors: Pushing the Boundaries The Effect of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Middle and Inner Ear Functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1