Interventions to Improve Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety in Latin America: a Systematic Review and Metasummary.

Journal of healthy eating and active living Pub Date : 2022-08-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Kathleen Trejo Tello, Sarah M Hughey, Sarah C Porto, Molly Hart, Anna Benson
{"title":"Interventions to Improve Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety in Latin America: a Systematic Review and Metasummary.","authors":"Kathleen Trejo Tello,&nbsp;Sarah M Hughey,&nbsp;Sarah C Porto,&nbsp;Molly Hart,&nbsp;Anna Benson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Road user fatalities account for a leading cause of preventable death in Latin America with pedestrians and bicyclists at higher risk for more extensive injuries as compared to other road users. Despite these vulnerable road user (VRU) risks, encouraging individuals to walk and cycle is an important public health strategy for addressing the region's obesity epidemic through promoting physical activity via active transportation (AT). However, in order to promote AT as a viable source of physical activity, safety of the VRU must be considered. The purpose of this systematic review and metasummary is to describe the effectiveness of interventions that have been implemented in Latin America to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. A systematic search of public health, policy, and engineering databases was completed using terms generated through the PICO method. The PRISMA framework was used for article screening. Eight articles detailing nine interventions across four countries were included for final synthesis and organized according to the Three E's Model of Injury Prevention, including three education-based interventions, two engineering, three enforcements, and one utilizing all Three E's. VRU outcomes assessed ranged from attitudes and behaviors to fatal injuries, with only enforcement-based interventions reporting on the latter. No interventions reported on non-fatal injury outcomes. Interventions rooted in each arm of the Three E's demonstrated limited ability to improve VRU outcomes, with enforcement-based interventions providing the strongest body of evidence. Findings demonstrate the limited research on VRU safety in Latin America, and further efforts should be of urgent public health priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"2 2","pages":"45-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/7e/jheal-2-2-45.PMC10521994.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Road user fatalities account for a leading cause of preventable death in Latin America with pedestrians and bicyclists at higher risk for more extensive injuries as compared to other road users. Despite these vulnerable road user (VRU) risks, encouraging individuals to walk and cycle is an important public health strategy for addressing the region's obesity epidemic through promoting physical activity via active transportation (AT). However, in order to promote AT as a viable source of physical activity, safety of the VRU must be considered. The purpose of this systematic review and metasummary is to describe the effectiveness of interventions that have been implemented in Latin America to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. A systematic search of public health, policy, and engineering databases was completed using terms generated through the PICO method. The PRISMA framework was used for article screening. Eight articles detailing nine interventions across four countries were included for final synthesis and organized according to the Three E's Model of Injury Prevention, including three education-based interventions, two engineering, three enforcements, and one utilizing all Three E's. VRU outcomes assessed ranged from attitudes and behaviors to fatal injuries, with only enforcement-based interventions reporting on the latter. No interventions reported on non-fatal injury outcomes. Interventions rooted in each arm of the Three E's demonstrated limited ability to improve VRU outcomes, with enforcement-based interventions providing the strongest body of evidence. Findings demonstrate the limited research on VRU safety in Latin America, and further efforts should be of urgent public health priority.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁美洲改善行人和骑自行车者安全的干预措施:系统综述和元综述。
道路使用者的死亡是拉丁美洲可预防死亡的主要原因,与其他道路使用者相比,行人和骑自行车的人受到更大范围伤害的风险更高。尽管存在这些易受伤害的道路使用者(VRU)风险,但鼓励个人步行和骑自行车是通过积极交通促进体育活动来应对该地区肥胖流行病的一项重要公共卫生战略。然而,为了促进AT成为一种可行的体育活动来源,必须考虑VRU的安全性。本系统综述和元综述的目的是描述拉丁美洲为改善行人和骑自行车者的安全而实施的干预措施的有效性。使用PICO方法生成的术语完成了对公共卫生、政策和工程数据库的系统搜索。PRISMA框架用于文章筛选。八篇文章详细介绍了四个国家的九项干预措施,并根据三个E的伤害预防模式进行了最终综合整理,包括三项基于教育的干预措施、两项工程、三项实施措施和一项利用所有三个E。评估的VRU结果从态度和行为到致命伤害不等,只有基于执法的干预措施报告了后者。没有关于非致命性损伤结果的干预措施报告。植根于三个E的每一个分支的干预措施表明,改善VRU结果的能力有限,基于执法的干预措施提供了最有力的证据。研究结果表明,拉丁美洲对VRU安全性的研究有限,进一步的努力应成为公共卫生的当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult Sports Participation and Physical Activity: How About Curling? Black Girls as Transformative Leaders in Physical Activity Programs. Brownfields to Healthfields: A Retrospective Ripple Effect Mapping Evaluation in Three Rural Communities. Complete Highway Removal vs. Highway Removal to Boulevards vs. Caps: Redressing Past Wrongs while Addressing the Decay of America's Most Ambitious Public Works Project. Developing translational products for adapting evidence-based physical activity interventions in rural communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1