Collaborative Learning Among Health Care Organizations to Improve Quality and Advance Racial Equity.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-09-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0098
Ivan A Copado, Amanda L Brewster, Sarah D Epstein, Timothy T Brown, Hector P Rodriguez
{"title":"Collaborative Learning Among Health Care Organizations to Improve Quality and Advance Racial Equity.","authors":"Ivan A Copado,&nbsp;Amanda L Brewster,&nbsp;Sarah D Epstein,&nbsp;Timothy T Brown,&nbsp;Hector P Rodriguez","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study examined stakeholder experiences of a statewide learning collaborative, sponsored and led by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) and facilitated by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews of key stakeholders (<i>n</i>=44) were analyzed to assess experiences of collaborative learning and interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in quality of care. The interviews included BCBSMA, IHI, provider groups, and external experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breast cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, hypertension management, and diabetes management were focal areas for reducing disparities. Collaborative learning methods involved expert coaching, group meetings, and sharing of best practices. Interventions tested included pharmacist-led medication management, strategies to improve the collection of race, ethnicity, and language (REaL) data, transportation access improvement, and community health worker approaches. Stakeholder experiences highlighted three themes: (1) the learning collaborative enabled the testing of interventions by provider groups, (2) infrastructure and pilot funding were foundational investments, but groups needed more resources than they initially anticipated, and (3) expertise in quality improvement and health equity were critical for the testing of interventions and groups anticipated needing this expertise into the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCBSMA's learning collaborative and intervention funding supported contracted providers in enhancing REaL data collection, implementing equity-focused interventions on a small scale, and evaluating their feasibility and impact. The collaborative facilitated learning among groups on innovative approaches for reducing racial disparities in quality. Concerns about sustainability underscore the importance of expertise for implementing initiatives to reduce racial and ethnic disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"525-532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study examined stakeholder experiences of a statewide learning collaborative, sponsored and led by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) and facilitated by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in quality of care.

Methods: Interviews of key stakeholders (n=44) were analyzed to assess experiences of collaborative learning and interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in quality of care. The interviews included BCBSMA, IHI, provider groups, and external experts.

Results: Breast cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, hypertension management, and diabetes management were focal areas for reducing disparities. Collaborative learning methods involved expert coaching, group meetings, and sharing of best practices. Interventions tested included pharmacist-led medication management, strategies to improve the collection of race, ethnicity, and language (REaL) data, transportation access improvement, and community health worker approaches. Stakeholder experiences highlighted three themes: (1) the learning collaborative enabled the testing of interventions by provider groups, (2) infrastructure and pilot funding were foundational investments, but groups needed more resources than they initially anticipated, and (3) expertise in quality improvement and health equity were critical for the testing of interventions and groups anticipated needing this expertise into the future.

Conclusions: BCBSMA's learning collaborative and intervention funding supported contracted providers in enhancing REaL data collection, implementing equity-focused interventions on a small scale, and evaluating their feasibility and impact. The collaborative facilitated learning among groups on innovative approaches for reducing racial disparities in quality. Concerns about sustainability underscore the importance of expertise for implementing initiatives to reduce racial and ethnic disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健组织之间的合作学习,以提高质量和促进种族公平。
背景:该研究考察了利益相关者在马萨诸塞州蓝十字蓝盾组织(BCBSMA)赞助和领导、医疗保健改善研究所(IHI)协助下开展的全州学习合作的经验,以减少护理质量方面的种族和民族差异。方法:对关键利益相关者(n=44)的访谈进行分析,以评估合作学习和干预措施的经验,以减少护理质量方面的种族和民族差异。访谈对象包括BCBSMA、IHI、供应商团体和外部专家。结果:乳腺癌症筛查、癌症筛查、高血压管理和糖尿病管理是缩小差异的重点领域。协作学习方法包括专家指导、小组会议和最佳实践分享。测试的干预措施包括药剂师主导的药物管理、改进种族、族裔和语言(REaL)数据收集的策略、交通便利性的改善以及社区卫生工作者的方法。利益相关者的经验突出了三个主题:(1)学习协作使提供者团体能够测试干预措施,(2)基础设施和试点资金是基础性投资,但团体需要比最初预期更多的资源,以及(3)质量改进和健康公平方面的专业知识对于测试干预措施和预计未来需要这种专业知识的群体至关重要。结论:BCBSMA的学习合作和干预资金支持签约提供商加强REaL数据收集,小规模实施以公平为重点的干预措施,并评估其可行性和影响。合作促进了各群体就减少种族质量差异的创新方法进行的学习。对可持续性的关切突显了专业知识对实施减少种族和族裔差异举措的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models. "She's a Family Member": How Community Health Workers Impact Perinatal Mothers' Stress Through Social-Emotional Support and Connections to Programs and Resources. Diversifying Doulas Initiative: Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in People of Color Through Doula Care. Improving Weight Bias Awareness Among Providers in the Sexual and Reproductive Health care Setting. Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1